3 Flashcards
Levels of analysis authors
Kenneth N. Walk, Morton A. Kaplan, J. David Singer
Nature of the world (1), How countries make fp (2), People as individuals or as a species (3)
system, state, individual levels
Six levels of analysis (largest-smallest)
International System, Relations, Society, Government, Role, Individual
International System is a set of interaction elements, focuses on distribution of -
capabilities, state resources, and status in int’l relations
Structural Characeristics (Structure of Authority)
Can range from hierarchical (vertical) to anarchical (horizontal). Int’l System mostly horizontal. Used for making/enforcing rules, allocating assets & conducting other authoritative tasks
International System vertical in specific issue areas
Most powerful states generally benefit from WTO, trade in general.
System Level Strengths
Good for explaining states’ motivations, interdependencies, and broadly predicting behavior based on what the states want to achieve. It is not as good at explaining individual events, circumstances, or political scenarios in detail.
Nongovernmental Characteristics of Wealthy States
Heavy material resources allow for sophisticated weapons, defense, great leverage using aid. Citizens expect consistent improvements in quality of living.
Changing Economic Conditions
Soviet Union/Russia switched roles from a wealthy superpower to dependent on foreign aid, due to domestic issues.
Big vs. Small Poor Countries
Big countries, like Pakistan and India can readily afford nuclear weapons due to their sheer size. Small countries much more vulnerable on becoming dependent on foreign MNCs
Theories on Capitalism and War
State leaders, due to strong pressures for foreign markets and resources, could be more likely to push for war.
Two-Level Game 1
National level interest groups pressure government to adopt their policies. These groups are organized into coalitions by politicians.
Two-Level Game 2
International level, national governments seek to maximize their power in solving domestic issues while being less vulnerable to foreign developments.
Two Level Example, Clinton + China WTO Membership 1998
Clinton criticizes Chinese human rights to diffuse pressure from Americans. China aware of his predicament and offers discussions on human rights issues
Strategic Culture
FP reflects country’s political culture. FP responses on international level are formulated by leaders to reflect this. Democracies more inclined towards cooperative action, Dictatorships concerned with security.