29-36 lectures Flashcards
what does a cause do?
causes an effect
what can outcomes have?
multiple outcomes
what is a cause?
an event, condition or characteristics that play an essential role in producing an occurrence of the disease
what can a causal pie model do?
used to see what exposers cause an outcome
together there exposures are sufficient to cause the outcome
what do we call a full pie?
a sufficient cause of the outcome
what is each exposure called?
a component of the sufficient cause
a component cause
how do we prevent a disease using a sufficient pie?
by removing exposures that are involved in multiple sufficent causes
what is a component cause?
necessary for the disease to occur
must be apart of every sufficient cause of the disease
how can we determine causation?
by considering if the association is a valid association
could the association that we are seeing be upto chance, bias or confounding
what happens if we have a valid association?
means it is not causal
what does BEST CDS mean?
Biological plausibility
Experimental evidence
Specificity
Temporal sequencing
Consistency
Dose-response relationship
Strength of association
what is biological plausibility?
if there is a plausable biological mechanism for the association, but epidemiology knowledge may precede knowledge on biological mechanisms
what is experimental evidence?
if there is evidence from human RCTs or animal experiments, however animal studies may not apply to humans
what is specificty?
if the exposure specificity associates with a particular outcome but not others, however it is quite common for exposures to be related to many outcomes
what is temporal sequencing?
seeing weather the exposure came before the outcome
what is consistancy?
if the finding are consistent with the findings from other studies, however there can be a number of reasons why studies might have different findings
what is dose-response relationship?
if the risk of the outcome changes with increasing or decreasing amounts of the exposure, but not all relationships are linear
what are strength of association?
the stronger the association, the less likely it is to be due to confounding or bias, however this is not always the case
what are the guildlines to see what is a causal relationship?
the BEST CDS
what is critical applause?
the process of carefully and systematically examining research to judge its trustworthiness, and its value and relevance in a particular content
what is the abstract?
provides a summary of the paper contents, a breif overveiw of the peice of work
what is the introduction?
provides beliefs story that has the aims of the study that are clearly stated
has the specific aim of the study
provides the backgrounsd to this research and what is already known on the subject
what is the methods?
used for others to carry outb the proces the same as the person that originally too the investigation
it contains the selection of participants, structure of the study, definition of exposures and outcomes measured
what is table 1?
usually the participants and their baseline characteristics
what are the results?
reporting of all the results in text, tables and figures
assessment of chance, bias and confounding
what is table 2?
usually results to interperate and relative risks
what is hazards risk the same as?
ratio risks
what is the discussion?
talks about the strength and challenges experience during the research study
what is concluision?
not always includes but usually outlines what this study adds to current knowledge, and where to from here
usually adds what the study adds to current knowledge
what is internal validity?
chance, bias, confounding
what is the reference?
list of research papers referred to in this paper
what are acknowledgements?
thanks contributors to the writing, research and funding of the research
what are conflicts of intrest?
identifies potential conflicts of interest
what are the 2 main types of reviews?
narritive and systematic
what are narritive reviews?
may be heavily influence by opinion
what are systematic reviews?
is replicable, transparent and systematic
why are systematic reviews done?
to collate evidence and synthesize thier results
what is needed in a protocol?
a specific clinical question
relevance of why we are doing this review
objectives of the study
a detailed search strategy
why do we combine results of a trial?
to generate an average result to apply a more precise outcome of the study
what is heterogeneity?
when something vaires across different groups
this is if the designs of the studies are too different
what is homogeneity?
when something is consistent across different groups
this is if the outcomes of the data are similar enough to combine to get an average result
what does sampling distribution give us?
where our true value might fall
why are forest plots called this?
because it looks likle a tree
what does the size of the dot in a forest plot mean?
the weight of the study
what are the lines of a forest plot mean?
the risk ratio and the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals
what is the width of the diamond in a forest plot mean?
the 95% confidence intervals
where is the null value in a forest plot?
the bottom of the plot
what is the limitations?
principal findings
limitations to the evidence
implications such as practice and research
what are challenges we face in the study?
getting a team of helpers
publication bias
poor quality trials/studies
heterogeneity
what are advantages we face in the study?
reproducibility
comprehensive
transparent limits
fill gaps in knowledge
forms basis for decisions