26 - APC Presentation &Case Study Flashcards
D&B- helped programme requirements- how?
Design & Build (D&B) helps meet programme requirements by allowing design and construction to overlap, which speeds up the project timeline.
In D&B, the contractor manages both design and construction, which reduces the need for multiple approvals and allows for faster decision-making and early procurement of long-lead items.
This streamlined process helps achieve key milestones more efficiently, keeping the project on track.
How did you determine the base build was in delay & extent of this? How did delay increase? How did you monitor this?
Identifying Delay:
Conducted regular site visits and programme reviews.
Noted key milestones were not being met during a monitoring visit.
Confirming Delay:
Raised concerns with the Basebuild team, who confirmed delays.
Reviewed the Basebuild Programme with the team to assess the delay’s extent.
Monitoring Ongoing Delay:
Used weekly progress updates and project dashboards to track any further delays.
Adjusted timelines as needed based on continued monitoring.
How did you negotiate early access with basebuild contractor?
To negotiate early access with the basebuild contractor, I took the following steps:
Prepared a Proposal: Assessed areas of the site where early access could begin without disrupting the basebuild work and created a detailed proposal outlining the benefits and programme impact.
Held Initial Discussions: Met with the basebuild contractor, developer, and project manager to present the proposal, explaining how early access would help meet the overall project timeline and prevent delays for the fit-out phase.
Addressed Key Concerns: Discussed potential risks, including site logistics, health and safety, coordination of trades, and insurance requirements, and proposed solutions to manage these effectively.
Secured Agreement: Worked with all parties to finalize specific early access dates and conditions, documenting the terms in a file note for formal confirmation, ensuring alignment across all stakeholders.
By demonstrating the benefits and addressing their concerns proactively, I was able to gain the basebuild contractor’s agreement to the early access strategy.
Early access strategy- What was this strategy and how was it implemented?
Objective: Enable the fit-out contractor to begin work on certain floors before Basebuild Practical Completion to help meet programme requirements.
Implementation Steps:
Identify Viable Areas: Reviewed the basebuild programme to pinpoint specific floors ready for early access without affecting basebuild work.
Stakeholder Coordination: Held discussions with the Basebuild team, client, and fit-out contractor to ensure alignment on timelines, logistics, and responsibilities.
Formalize Access Arrangements: Drafted a file note capturing agreed access dates, coordination requirements, and safety measures, which was circulated to all parties for confirmation.
Establish Clear Boundaries: Defined work zones for the fit-out contractor to avoid interference with the basebuild contractor’s ongoing work.
Regular Monitoring and Communication: Set up progress updates and site meetings to address any issues and maintain smooth coordination throughout early access stages.
How would you escalate the delays?
Identify the Delay’s Impact: Assess and document the extent and impact of the delay on the overall programme and critical milestones.
Notify Key Stakeholders: Inform the client, project sponsors, and senior management about the delay, explaining its potential effects on project outcomes.
Engage with the Contractor: Arrange a meeting with the basebuild and fit-out contractors to understand the root causes and discuss corrective actions.
Present Mitigation Options: Propose solutions, such as early access or revised work schedules, to minimize the delay’s impact.
Request Additional Resources or Support: If needed, request additional resources or schedule adjustments from stakeholders to keep the project on track.
Document and Track Escalation: Log all escalated issues in the project dashboard and update stakeholders regularly until the delay is resolved.
Mention 2wks float in programme- What are the different types of float? How is float dealt with under JCT? Who is entitled to the float?
Different Types of Float:
Total Float: The amount of time a task can be delayed without affecting the project’s overall completion date.
Free Float: The time a task can be delayed without impacting the start of any subsequent tasks.
Project Float: The time added to the overall project duration, which provides a buffer between project completion and the client’s required completion date.
How Float is Dealt with Under JCT:
Ownership of Float: Under JCT, float isn’t explicitly assigned to either party, so it’s often considered to be available for the project as a whole. It can be used by either party if delays occur.
Entitlement to Float: In practice, float is typically used on a first-come, first-served basis, meaning the party whose activities cause the delay may use available float to minimize programme impact.
In short, float under JCT is shared, allowing either the contractor or employer to benefit from it as needed to meet programme requirements.
Sectional Completion- What did you require to introduce sections into the contract? What do you require from each party? Was it a deed or underhand? What was the limitation period as a result?
Requirements to Introduce Sections:
Clear Definition of Sections: A clear breakdown of which parts of the project would be completed as separate sections, each with its own completion date.
Revised Programme: A detailed programme showing completion dates for each section, agreed upon by all parties.
Requirements from Each Party:
Client: Agreement on sectional dates and understanding of implications, such as partial occupancy and potential additional operational considerations.
Contractor: Acceptance of sectional handover requirements and commitment to manage works to meet sectional completion dates, ensuring minimal disruption to remaining works.
Deed or Underhand:
This was typically completed by deed to ensure clarity and enforceability for each section.
Limitation Period:
Since it was completed by deed, the limitation period is 12 years for claims related to sectional completion.
Expectations for handover- what were these? How did you communicate these with the Contractor?
These were communicated at the tender stage and within the contract.
How I Communicated These with the Contractor
Pre-Handover Meetings: Organized regular handover planning meetings with the contractor well in advance to review all handover expectations.
Handover Checklist: Issued a detailed handover checklist covering all criteria, documentation, and required conditions.
Written Confirmation: Sent formal communications summarizing expectations and the agreed handover process, ensuring alignment and clarity across all parties.
Cat B vs Cat A
Cat A and Cat B refer to levels of office fit-out:
Cat A: The basic fit-out provided by the landlord or developer, typically including ceilings, raised floors, basic lighting, HVAC, and fire alarms. It leaves a “blank canvas” for tenants to add their specific requirements.
Cat B: A customized fit-out tailored to the tenant’s needs. It includes partition walls, meeting rooms, flooring, specialized lighting, furniture, branding, and any unique finishes to create a fully operational workspace.
In short: Cat A is a standard, ready-to-occupy shell, while Cat B turns it into a functional, personalized office for the tenant.
How did you score Contractors and shortlist them?
Scoring and Shortlisting Contractors
Evaluation Criteria:
Technical Capability: Assessed experience on similar projects, qualifications, and relevant expertise.
Programme and Approach: Evaluated proposed timeline, methodology, and understanding of project requirements.
Financial Stability: Reviewed financial health to ensure the contractor could support the project’s duration.
Pricing and Value: Scored based on submitted cost proposals, balancing budget alignment with value offered.
Health & Safety: Checked safety records, policies, and accreditations to ensure compliance and site safety.
References and Reputation: Considered feedback from past clients and reviews of previous work quality.
Scoring Methodology: Created a weighted scoring matrix for each criterion to objectively evaluate each contractor’s suitability.
Shortlisting:
Compiled and ranked scores to shortlist top-performing contractors for final interviews or presentations before selecting the preferred bidder.
What’s included in tender docs
Invitation to Tender (ITT): Outlines the tender process, submission requirements, deadlines, and selection criteria.
Scope of Works: Detailed description of the work required, including project objectives, specifications, and quality standards.
Drawings and Plans: Architectural, structural, and MEP (mechanical, electrical, plumbing) drawings that define the project’s design and requirements.
Specifications: Detailed technical standards for materials, workmanship, and finishes required for the project.
Bills of Quantities / Pricing Schedule: Itemized list of materials, quantities, and work items that contractors use to price their bids.
Contract Terms: Proposed contract (e.g., JCT, NEC) with terms and conditions that will govern the project.
Health and Safety Requirements: Expectations for site safety, risk assessments, and relevant safety certifications.
Tender Return Requirements: Instructions on the documents to be submitted, including pricing, programme, and any other specific information requested.
Form of Tender: A declaration form for contractors to confirm they understand and agree to the tender conditions and terms.
You mention in your case study that the D&B route helped programme requirements- how?
In my case study, the Design & Build (D&B) route supported programme requirements by allowing design and construction phases to overlap, accelerating the timeline.
With D&B, the contractor managed both the design and construction processes, enabling faster decision-making and early procurement of long-lead items.
This integrated approach helped reduce delays, streamline communications, and allowed us to tackle critical tasks simultaneously, keeping the project on track with our programme requirements.
You mentioned GTMS were appointed prior to RIBA Stage 0, what is involved in Stage 0?
RIBA Stage 0 – Strategic Definition involves establishing the project’s strategic objectives and determining if it’s viable. Key activities include:
Identifying Client Objectives: Understanding the client’s goals, needs, and budget.
Initial Feasibility Study: Assessing site potential, constraints, and high-level costs.
Project Brief Development: Outlining the project’s purpose, requirements, and desired outcomes.
Project Team Appointments: Engaging initial consultants, like GTMS, for early-stage input and guidance.
Business Case Preparation: Ensuring the project aligns with the client’s strategic objectives and provides value.
The goal of Stage 0 is to confirm the project’s purpose, feasibility, and alignment with client expectations before moving forward.
What contract provisions exist relating to possession of the site?
Could this have been explored instead and what is the process for this?
Under the JCT Standard Form of Building Contract, an employer can defer giving possession of a construction site to a contractor for up to six weeks from the contract’s “Date of Possession”. This deferment is considered a Relevant Event, which entitles the contractor to additional time. The contractor may also be entitled to recover losses and expenses from the employer if the deferment significantly impacts the project’s progress.
If the employer fails to give possession of the site on time, it’s a serious breach of contract. The contract may also state the consequences of this failure, such as the employer losing the right to claim liquidated damages.
Some reasons why an employer might defer possession include: Plant hire, Using operatives elsewhere, Delivery dates, Sub-contractor key dates, and Increased costs and interest charges.
Early access strategy- How did it impact CDM?
The early access strategy impacted CDM (Construction Design and Management) Regulations in several ways, requiring adjustments to ensure compliance:
Coordination of Health and Safety Responsibilities: With both the basebuild and fit-out contractors on site simultaneously, I ensured that roles and responsibilities under CDM were clearly defined to avoid any gaps or overlaps in safety duties.
Updated Risk Assessments and Method Statements (RAMS): Each contractor had to update their RAMS to reflect the shared site environment, specifically addressing risks associated with multiple trades operating in the same space.
Enhanced Site Induction and Briefings: Conducted additional inductions and briefings to cover specific hazards posed by early access and shared site activities, ensuring all workers were aware of additional risks and procedures.
Revised Site Logistics Plan: Adjusted the logistics plan to account for shared access routes, equipment zones, and material storage, minimizing safety risks and potential clashes between teams.
By addressing these CDM requirements, we maintained a safe, compliant site despite the complexities introduced by early access.
You mention you developed a phased construction programme to implement the early access strategy, how did you develop this?
I personally did not develop this. I supported the main fit-out contractor developing a revised construction programme.
Sectional Completion- How did you introduce sections into the contract? What do you require from each party? Was it a deed or underhand? What was the limitation period as a result?
Deed of variation:
1. New scope, cost
2. Dates
3. Written agreement / confirmation from all parties,
4. Signature by 2 company directors/secretary.
Deed vs underhand – 12 vs 6 yrs limitiation period
Expectations for handover- what were these? How did you communicate these with the Contractor?
Included with ITT docs, if changed they were included within the Deed of Variation.