2.3 Ethics Flashcards
Define research ethics…
The moral principles guiding research from its inception through to completion and publication of results
What is the main body of ethics code?
BPS Code of Ethics and Conduct
What are the four principles of BPS Code?
Respect, Competence, Responsibility and Integrity
What does Respect refer to in the four principles
Respect for the dignity of people, the inherent worth of all human beings and that all humans are worthy of equal moral consideration
What does Competence refer to in the BPS code?
- Value the continuing development and maintenance of high standards of competence
- Work within the recognized limits of your knowledge, skill, training, education and experience
What does responsibility refer to in the BPS code?
- see the responsibility to the people, public and profession of psych
- avoid harm
- prevent misuse of your research in its contribution to society
What does Integrity refer to in the BPS code?
- value honesty, probity, accuracy, clarity and fairness
- seek to promote integrity in all facets of scientific and professional endeavors
What are the consequences of BPS code for ppts?
- informed consent
- right to withdraw
- risk (e.g. minimse psych/physical harm, deception, etc.)
- debriefing and aftercare
- ethical approval prior to the “experiment”
Give four examples of historic studies that violate the ethics code.
- Milgram
- Stanford prison
- Syphilis study
- WW2 studies
What as a consequence of the experiments in concentration camps?
Resulted in the development of the Nuremberg code of ethics in Medical Research (1947) - Risk against benefit and need for informed consent
Describe Milgram’s study
- 18 variations
- Used prods (e.g. The experiment requires you to continue)
- Goes against right to withdraw
- there was a debrief but it wasn’t substantial
Describe the Stanford Prison Experiment (1971)
- signed informed consent
- some harassment, minimal diet
- Escalated on day 2, guards became abusive, prisoners became passive and with drawn
Describe the Syphilis study at Tuskegee in ethical terms
- aim: observe the natural history of untreated syphilis
- 600 AA men took part
- reward: free medical care, meals and burial insurance
- Ppts informed consent wasn’t collected
- 1943 penicillin became a treatment for syphilis, but ppts were not offered it
what 8 factors does informed consent need to address
- aims for project
- time commitment
- risk outlined
- opportunity to withdraw at anytime without consequences
- confidentiality and anonymity conditions
- planned debrief
- contact details of researcher
What is a benefit of deception?
- knowing all detail may prime ppts to respond differently than they would in real-life situations
what are three risks of deception?
- goes against principles of ethics and conduct (Integrity and responsibility)
- Informed consent?
- Could generate suspicion
What is debriefing?
- After study is completed
- Communicate full info
- Include researchers contact details
- explained rationale for deception
- eliminate all possibility of harmful after-effects