2.1.1-2.2.4 Memory Flashcards
What does Tulving propose about LTM?
That it can be split into 2 memory stores:
episodic and semantic
Tulving’s full model
-LTM
-Declarative/Nondeclarative
-Episodic, Semantic/Procedural
What are semantic memories?
-general knowledge, facts and meanings: a mental encyclopedia
-can be associated with other facts that link concepts together, eg. maths equations
-Eg, capital of France
How are semantic memories encoded?
-encoded accoustically
-memories can be encoded from episodic memories (new facts/concepts learnt from experiences)
How does retrieval of semantic memories occur?
-doesn’t rely on (context) cues, but can be used
-retrieval can occur without learning or interfering and changing the knowledge
How does forgetting semantic memories occur?
-memory trace is strong and information is less susceptible to change eg 2+2=4 won’t change
Where are semantic memories located?
located in the frontal and temporal cortexes
What are episodic memories?
-memories personal to an individual
-based on personal experience
-linked to the time and context that they happened in
-must pass through semantic memories to become episodic
How are episodic memories encoded?
-encoded using all forms
-stored in terms of temporal links (when) and spatial links (where)
How does retrieval of episodic memories occur?
-use of environmental or emotional cues which were encoded at point of learning the memory, if these context cues are present, we are more likely to recall the memory
-uses prior knowledge to access the memory
How does forgetting episodic memories occur?
-forgetting due to failure to retrieve cues
-memories can be changed and distorted in content as they are linked to previous memories
Where are episodic memories stored?
-processed in hippocampus
-hippocampus also connects elements of an event from various visual, olfactory and auditory areas of brain to form an episode
-consolidated and stored in neocortex
Temporal link relevance to semantic and episodic memories
-episodic: dependent on time referencing as memories about events are linked to time they occurred
-semantic: detached from temporal link as facts can be recalled without reference to when it was learned
What is the spatial link?
idea that we can piece together information that has been inputted at different points
Spatial link relevance to semantic and episodic memories
-episodic: detached from spatial link as we experience a whole episode continuously
-semantic: related to spatial link as we can learn facts in a fragmented way
Relationships between the stores
-semantic doesn’t need episodic (don’t need to remember experience behind learning a fact)
-but semantic memories can be encoded from episodic ones (learn new facts/concepts from an experience)
-episodic needs to pass through semantic (must draw on previous knowledge of something to understand it)
Evaluate Tulving (strengths)
-Evidence- Clive Wearing supports different types of LTM, lost episodic memory (wedding) but still has procedural (piano), verifies that LTM is split into declarative and non-declarative
-Application- eyewitness testimonies, episodic memories retrieved via cues, police know to use cues to gain detailed EWT eg reconstructions, returning to crime scene, identity parades
Evaluate Tulving (weaknesses)
Comparisons and Credibility
-describing LTM as 2 separate systems doesn’t account for interrelationship of continuity between each system
-eg they work together when given an episodic memory task like learning a list (words can have semantic feature and episodic reference)
-therefore problematic to research into separate stores as they can’t be studied in absolute isolation
How Good is the Evidence?
-case studies not valid research method
-results are ungeneralisable and specific to individual, small sample sizes, lack of comparison to before
-evidence is void as it is unrepresentative and doesn’t effectively show cause and effect/change over time
evaluate reconstructive memory (strengths)
-Evidence-Allport and postman, story changed based on racial bias, memory changes based on schema
-Evidence-Bartlett-war of ghosts story, recall memory and it is reconstructed
evaluate reconstructive memory (weaknesses)
-how good? bartlett, not rigorously controlled or objective and instructions weren’t standardised, lacks reliability and validity
-credibility- limited in explanation for recalling memories, doesn’t explain why unusual info that doesn’t fit with schemas is remembered, some other theories explain better
what does bartlett propose?
-reconstructive memory
-idea that we alter information we have stored when we recall it, based on prior knowledge and expectations
what does ‘effort after meaning’ mean (bartlett)
-effort put in when trying to find correct schema that results in understanding an object
what is a ‘schema’
-stereotypes, previous experiences, knowledge and expectations
-past and current experiences reflect how an event is remembered
-determined by social prejudice so linked to prejudice
-eg. if someone asks you to list 10 foods you’ll list your 10 faves first
what is the input and processing of an event
-input: perception of event
-processing: perception and interpretation of event