2.1 Source Selection Planning Flashcards
Source Selection Purpose
Maximize competition and innovation
Provide a structured fair impartial evaluations of offerors
Select best source
Generic Source Selection process
- Source Selection Planning
- RFP to industry
- Proposals from industry
- Evaluations of proposals
- Establish competitive range
- hold discussions
- Final proposal revisions
- Evaluation of FPRs
- Select source
- contract award
- De-briefings
Source selection authority (SSA)
selects best value offeror(s)
Source Selection Advisory Council
reviews SSEB findings, compares offerors, and
makes best value recommendation to SSA
required for contract value >=100M
Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB)
evaluates offerings IAW RFP
Source Selection Plan
Details all aspects of source selection process
Key elements:
Source Selection Team Composition
Acquisition Strategy
Conduct
Criteria for Proposal Evaluation (Section M)
Prepared by Contracting Officer/IPT
Approved by SSA
PM Roles and Responsibilities in Source Selection Process
- Ensure technical requirements are approved and stable
- Establish technical specifications
- Develop Statement of Work (SOW), Statement of Objectives (SOO), or Performance Work Statement (PWS)
- Allocate Resources to support SSP
- Assist in establishing SST
- Assist in development of evaluation criteria
Types of Pre-RFP Communications with industry
- Market Research
- Request For Information (RFI)
- Industry Day
- Draft Request For Proposal
Request for Proposal Requirements
- Statement of Objectives
- Performance Work Statement
- Statement of Work
- System Specification
- Capabilities Development Document
(some organizations)
Evaluation factors/subfactors
Meaningful discrimination among offerors
o Cost
o Technical
o Past Performance
o Small Business
Participation
(if needed)
Tailored to the acquisition
Level of detail, number will vary (minimize)
Factor Relative Importance
“Numerical or percentage weighting of the relative importance of evaluation factors and sub-factors shall not be used.”
Best Value Continuum: Lowest Price/Technically Acceptable (LPTA)
Non-Price Factor(s): Pass/Fail Only
Price Factor: Lowest Price
No Tradeoff:
Lowest Price that is Technically Acceptable [“Pass” on all nonprice factors].
Best Value Continuum: Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price (VATEP)
Bidders receive a price evaluation credit for achieving defined, (preferably measurable) performance beyond threshold values
Tradeoff
Limited to subjective non-VATEP factors only. Must document basis for award to other than lowest evaluated price.
Best Value Continuum: Combination Approach
-Some factors pass/fail
-Other factors used in tradeoff
For example–
Technical: Pass/Fail;
Tradeoff only allowed between Past Perf.
and Price
Tradeoff
Limited to NON-pass/fail factors only. Must document basis for award to other than lowest price or other than highest rated on non-price factors.
Best Value Continuum: Subjective
Tradeoff
Can award to offer that is other than lowest price or other than highest rated on non-price factors. Tradeoff is among price and non-price factors.
Tradeoff
All factors in tradeoff. Must document basis for award to other than lowest price or other than highest rated on non-price factors.