2.1 - Evaluating Evidence And Thinking Critically Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What four things make up research in psychology?

A

Hypothesis

Method

Results

Interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a hypothesis?

A

A clear and predictive statement

In psych, they must lead to predictions

Found in if-then form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is scientific method in psychology?

A

HOW researchers conduct procedure

If studies with different methods come to the same conclusion, then the conclusion is stronger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What do results require to be “good results?”

A

A researcher must determine what outcomes are able to reach an explanation vs if the outcomes are chance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is interpretation?

A

Researcher interpreta results to see whether their hypothesis was supported or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happens after a research study is finished? What does it become?

A

A theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a theory?

A

An explanation or model that fits many observations and makes valid predictions

Technically no theory is true unless backed by research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What makes a theory “falsifiable?” Define falsifiable.

A

If many attempts to falsify a theory fail, then the theory is falsifiable.

Describes a theory stated in clear terms so that we can see what evidence would count against it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is burden of proof and who shows it?

A

Obligation to present evidence to support one’s claim

Anyone who makes the claim (for ex - prosecution in jury) is responsible for acquiring evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are replicable results?

A

Results that anyone can reproduce, at least approximately, by following the same procedure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a non-replicable result example?

A

(1960s-1970s) Researchers claimed that chemicals in rats that could accomplish a task may be extracted (via syringe) and put into another rat’s brain, making the second rat able to do the task the first rat was trained to do. When other scientists tried to replicate this, they found no results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define meta-analysis.

A

Combines the results of many studies and analyzes them as if they were all one huge study

Determines which variatuons in procesure increase or decrease effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define Parsimony. What is it also known as? Is it a conservative or liberal idea?

A

Simplest and most consistent explanation for an occurance that stays in line with other well established theories.

AKA Occam’s razor

It is a conservative idea where we try not to assume more complex solutions if a current answer is already simpler.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The skepticismt towards the story of Clever Hans the Amazing Horse and his trainer von Osten is an example of what?

A

Applied parsimony - Oskar Pfungst applied parsimony to Hans and Osten, meaning that an easier way to explain the miracle horse was that the horse was looking for visual keys from the trainer, not necessarily understanding complex math

DOES NOT technically disprove it though

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define ESP. How does parsimony play a role in evaluating ESP?

A

ESP - that some people sometimes are able to acquire info without receiving energy through any organ

Parsimony and assuming the easiest solution deems that ESP is roo complicated and unnecessary of an explanation for random events that could be explained in simpler terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who was a pro psychic?

A

Kreskin

17
Q

What is the Ganzeld procedure?

A

Person in one room looks at a series of pics, another person in a separate room guesses the thoughts which run through the other person’s mind to prove ESP. (Bem and Honorton 1999)

18
Q

Why should I be skeptical about ESP?

A

Esp has little replicability

Parsimony says it is a more complex solution than is necezsary to explain certain events

19
Q

What’s an anecodote?

A

Reports if peoples’ isolated events, usually occuring from coincidence

Ex - Prophet Nostradamus

If we don’t know what a prediction means until after we passed the event, then is it really a prediction at all?