20.6: Other Factors Affecting Capital Structure Flashcards
Define the static trade-off theory and explain its importance in capital structure decisions.
Static Trade-Off Theory
- Definition: A theory that states a firm uses debt to maximize its tax advantages up to the point where these benefits are outweighed by the associated estimated costs of financial distress and bankruptcy.
-
Importance:
- Balances the tax shield benefits of debt with the potential costs of financial distress.
- Helps in determining the optimal level of debt in a firm’s capital structure.
- Illustrated by the relationship between firm value, debt ratio, and financial distress costs.
Figure 21.8: Firm Value and Financial Distress Costs
Figure 21.8: Firm Value and Financial Distress Costs
- Straight Line: Represents the M&M value of the levered firm, factoring in corporate taxes (Value = Unlevered Firm Value + Tax Shield).
- Curved Line: Shows expected value loss from financial distress and bankruptcy, increasing with the debt ratio.
- Optimal Debt Level: Occurs where the slope of the tax-corrected value line equals the slope of the financial distress curve, balancing tax benefits against distress costs.
Explain how the WACC is affected by debt according to the static trade-off model.
WACC and Debt
- Initial Impact: WACC declines as more debt is added due to the cheaper cost of debt.
- Beyond Optimal Point: WACC begins to increase when financial distress and bankruptcy risks outweigh tax benefits.
- D/E* Point: The debt-to-equity ratio where WACC is minimized and firm value is maximized, representing the optimal capital structure.
What is the pecking order theory, and how does it relate to capital structure decisions?
Pecking Order Theory
- Definition: The order in which firms prefer to raise financing, starting with internal cash flow, then debt, and finally common equity.
-
Relevance:
- Highlights the importance of information asymmetries and agency problems.
- Suggests firms avoid issuing new equity to prevent adverse market reactions and maintain control.
- Managers prefer financing methods that require the least external validation.
Describe the impact of information asymmetries and agency problems on capital structure decisions.
Information Asymmetries and Agency Problems
- Information Asymmetry: Differences in information among shareholders, creditors, and management can lead to mispricing of new share issues and suboptimal capital structure decisions.
- Agency Problems: Managers may make decisions in their interest rather than shareholders, affecting the firm’s financing hierarchy.
- Effect: Drives firms to follow a pecking order, prioritizing internal financing over external to avoid revealing sensitive information.
Role in Pecking Order Theory
Role in Pecking Order Theory
- Information Asymmetries: Firms prefer internal financing to avoid signaling undervaluation and triggering negative market reactions.
- Agency Problems: Managers favor financing methods that align with their long-term commitments to the firm, often prioritizing internal cash flow.
- Result: Pecking order minimizes risk and justifications needed from managers, preserving firm value.