2: Social Perception and Attitudes Flashcards

1
Q

Non-verbal communication: five basic channels:

A

facial expressions, eye contact, body movements, posture and touching.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Attribution

A
  • efforts to understand why people have acted as they have
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Correspondent inference

A

(how we decide what traits a person possesses based on overt actions informed by: freely chosen, noncommon, social desirability)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

covariation theory

A

(internal or external attributions based on: consensus, consistency and distinctiveness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

emblems

A

body movements that carry specific meanings linked to a culture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

We are more likely to make inferences about peoples when (Correspondent inference)

A
  1. Their actions are freely chosen,
  2. There are distinct effects (noncommon, one specific factor, leads to a specific outcome) and
  3. The behaviour is low is social desirability or violates social norms.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Covariation theory

A

we make internal (dispositional) or external (situational) attributions based on three factors: consensus, consistency and distinctiveness.
- internal/external, stable/unstable? Controllable/uncontrollable?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Action Identification

A

the interpretation we put on an act in terms of level of abstractions (meaning, high level abstraction is making inferences about a person’s intentions and goals)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Correspondence Bias / Fundamental Attribution Error

A

over attribution to internal causes, the inclination to overlook certain external causes of a person’s behaviour, “Thats just who they are”
-most common when distinctiveness and consensus are low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Actor-Observer Effect

A

we tend to perceive our own actions as being linked to external causes, and the actions of other as more reflective of their traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Self-serving bias

A

“I’m good, you’re lucky.” One’s positive outcomes = internal causes, one’s own negative outcomes – external outcomes.
- general in scope, but powerful in its effect for 2 main reasons:
cognitive (expectation to succeed) and motivational (the need to protect, self-esteem)
Hubris – exaggerated self-confidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Suppose you saw a parent at the supermarket yelling at her child. Apply Kelley’s Covariation Theory and attribute the parent’s behaviour to external and internal causes. Compare these attributions with those you might make using Davis’s theory of correspondent inference.

A

Covariation
External causes: maybe they just lost a job and are living in poverty, didn’t sleep much last night, or are dealing with intergenerational trauma
Internal: rude person, short temper, authoritative person
Correspondent inference
1. Freely chosen? – the parent could have chosen to control their temper
2. Non-common – is this considered normal behaviour to me? Or is this considered abnormal?
3. Social desirability – this person is acting in a socially undesirable way, so I will pay more attention to it and make more inferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

My cousin takes astrology seriously. She believes that the events in her life have been predetermined by the positions of the stars and planets at the time of her birth. She won’t make a major decision without first consulting her horoscope. How would you expect this general, external self-attribution to affect her behaviour?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cognitive Processes underlying persuasion are
Determined by

A

our capacity to process information, level of motivation and influence by more peripheral cues (distraction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The two Cognitive Processes underlying persuasion:

A

Systematic – careful consideration, requires effort, absorbs information processing capacity and
Heuristic – peripheral route, mental short cuts,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

no relevance + strong and convincing arguments =

A

persuasion is not strongly influenced by the strength of the arguments, tend to process through heuristic mode

17
Q

Classical conditioning

A

conditioned and unconditioned stimulus (direct route – more generally effective), repeated pairing to create a memory link, indirect – unaware of link being formed, but positive feeling toward the unconditioned stimulus), via subliminal conditioning and mere exposure, classical conditioning can occur without awareness

18
Q

Instrumental conditioning

A

differential rewards and punishments, families likely continue political and social views due to instrumental conditioning, the desire to fit in

19
Q

Do attitudes predict behaviour?

A

Attitudes do not necessarily predict behaviour especially in social contexts
-attitudes high in clarity and correctness and more likely to predict behaviour in private and in public.

20
Q

Pluralistic ignorance

A

erroneously believing that other have different views than themselves (can limit expression in public)

21
Q

what factors contribute to a strong attitude?

A

extremity, certainty and degree of personal experience

22
Q

How does reasoned thought guide behaviour?

A

reasoned thought guides behaviour more when there is a plan for how and when, (behaviour intentions, implementation plans)

23
Q

what predicts behaviour?

A

careful thought to our attitudes, intentions, norms and perceived control over our actions, all predict behaviour

24
Q

Attitude-to-behaviour-process Model

A

suggests that attitudes can be activated by shaping interpretation of the situation, which in turn influences behaviour.

25
Q

fear appeals appear to

A

induce argument against the threat

26
Q

messages not designed to be persuasive

A

= more persuasive due to the effect of forewarning

27
Q

How do we resist persuasion?

A

Reactance – a negative reaction to others’ attempts to reduce our freedom of choice (related to the experience of threat)
Forewarning – more opportunity to produce counter arguments, resist
forewarning does not prevent persuasion when people are distracted
(there are instances when forewarning can induce agreeance “I’ll look stupid if I don’t agree with this expert.)

28
Q

ego depletion

A

is the idea that self-control draws on a limited mental resource that can be used up. (makes people consider the strength of an argument less)

29
Q

Cognitive Dissonance

A

an inconsistency between attitudes and behaviours, tend to make us uncomfortable, relate with activity in the left front regions of the brain

30
Q

Strategies for resolving Dissonance

A

reduce discomfort – DIRECT: alter behaviour, deciding that the inconsistency does not matter (trivialization), INDIRECT: trivialization is not feasible, focus on other methods to feel good about themselves (self affirmations, substance use etc.)

31
Q

Cultural tightness vs looseness

A

(tight (India and non-western cultures) =
personal attitudes are less strongly linked to behaviour = perceived normative appropriateness is crucial for predicting behaviour)