2 Ethical Principles in Business Flashcards
What does the Utilitarianism state?
Who are the two leading utilitarian theorists?
- actions and policies should be evaluaed on the basis of benefits and costs they will impose on society
-> The only morally right action is that where utility is greatest by comparison to the utility of all the other alternatives
Jeremy Bentham
John Stuart Mill
John Bentham states that the principle of utility should be…
… the basis of morality and law, because it helps us answer what produces the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people.
(uility= whatever promotoes pleasure and prevents pain)
According to Bentham, there are three important features of utiliarianism. What are they?
1.
2.
3.
- happiness is the result of pleasure and the absence of pain (nothing except pleasure goes into happiness)
- all pleasures and pains are equal (mocking someone = helping someone)
- sacrificing one persons interests for the sake of the majority (building football stadium > clinic of more people are happy)
Mill argued that greater weight should be…
Which means that the pleasure preferred by a mayority of people…
…. put on higher pleasures.
….who had experienced both pleasures should be counted as the higher pleasure.
Mill argued that, far from being in tension with individual rights, the principle of utility was actually…
… the justification for protecting rights.
What is the step by step to apply utilitarianism?
1.
2.
3.
4.
- determine all alternative actions possible in this situation
- for each alternative action, estimate the direct and
indirect benefits and costs of the action for all persons affected - for each action, subtract the costs from the benefits to
determine the net utility of each action - the action with the greatest sum total of utility must be chosen as the ethically appropriate course of action
Utilitarianism can explain why we hold certain types of activities to be immoral, because…
of the costly effects it has in the long run.
(eg lying)
What are some critic points to utiliarianism?
1.
2.
- not all values can be measured (Utilitarians respond that monetary or other common sense measures can
measure everything.) - fails with RIGHTS and JUSTICE
(Rights: people have rights to life and basic needs. justice does not depend on mere utility, so utilitarianism does not
provide a complete picture of morality.
Justice: Utilitarianism looks only at how much utility is produced in a society, not how that utility is distributed among the members of society. )
-> Utilitarians respond that rule-utilitarianism can deal with rights and justice
What are the 5 major problems with the utilitarian reliance on measurement?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
- Comparative measures of different people (i.e. students preparing for an exam: enjoyment?, stress?).
- Some things are impossible to measure. (How much is a human life worth?, how much a life-extending drug under pain?)
- potential benefits and costs cannot always be reliably
predicted, so they are not adequately measurable. (What is the benefits of 2 weeks holidays?) - unclear exactly what counts as a benefit or a cost
- “all goods can be traded for equivalents of each other” However, not everything has a monetary equivalent (i.e. death).
Define…
- Right.
- Legal Right.
- Moral (human) rights.
- an individual’s entitlement to something
- An entitlement that derives from a legal system that permits or empowers a person to act in a specified way or that requires others to act in certain ways toward that person (only where the legal system is)
- rights that all human beings everywhere possess to an equal extent simply by virtue of being human beings. (for all humans)
Why do moral judgements made on the basis of rights differ substantially from those based on utility?
1.
2.
3.
- First, they are based on the individual, whereas utilitarianism is based on society as a whole.
- Second, rights limit the validity of preferring numbers and social benefits to the
individual. - Third, although rights generally override utilitarian standards, they do not always do so. In times of war, for example, civil rights are commonly restricted for the public good.
What are features of Moral Rights?
1.
2.
3.
4.
- VIOLATION: can be violated even when no one is hurt
- DUTIES: correlated with duties others have toward the person with the right
- AUTONOMY: Provide individuals with autonomy and equality in the free pursuit of their interests
- JUSTIFICATION: Provide basis for justifying one’s actions
JADV
What is a key difference between Moral rights and utilitatian standards?
Moral rights focus on securing the interests of the individual unlike utilitarian standards (focusing on securing the aggregate utility of society).
What are the three kinds of moral rights?
1.
2.
3.
- negative rights require others to leave us alone (eg privacy)
- positive rights reuire others to help us (health care, food)
- contractual or special right reuire others to keep their agreements (parties know whats going on; no misinterpretation; no duress or coercion; no agreement to immoral act)
Utilitarians think that the right thing to do is… (1)
Libertarians disagree. They think that… (2)
- whatever produces the greatest amount of happiness.
- we must never violate anyone’s “rights”—even if doing so would increase overall happiness.
Liberitarian Example: Robert Nozick