19 - Critical Appraisals Flashcards
What is a critical appraisal?
The use of explicit, transparent methods to assess the data in published research to judge it’s trust worthiness and its value and relevance in a particular context
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48632/486325489e1784ba60d717d98d39a9b0e23ec656" alt=""
How do you develop your question in a critical appraisal?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f65a/8f65a8a9f6a0edffc70115d1eb5e19483cb7e005" alt=""
How do we find evidence to use in our critical appraisals?
- Use things like Pubmed, Cochrane Library, NHS evidence
- Is article relevant to my interests?
- Is there a clear research question?
- When was it published?
- Has it been peer reviewed?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1c8f/a1c8fcf0a75a338e57906f8a1bd38e757e8cbb24" alt=""
What are some reasons that articles get rejected from being included in a critical appraisal?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d38f/4d38f112d5e999e2e8461dfea4cd834f057284a9" alt=""
What is the process involved in a critical appraisal?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8fca/f8fca79d6c929dfa017bb8a7809447be3681156c" alt=""
How can you quickly narrow down whether you want to include a paper in your critical appraisal?
- Research question and aim at end of background/introduction and you should be able to answer PICO with this
- Is the primary outcome easy to identify?
- Is the study population easy to generalise or applicale to your population of interest?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ccb2/2ccb2d0887da80abd7ef74d457777ae31afd6d5a" alt=""
Once you have figured out if a paper answers your PICO, what are some other factors you need to consider when deciding whether to include the paper in your critical appraisal?
- Selection bias: is how the study sample was develped described? is there a difference between people who have been selected and who hasn’t?
- Data collection: is the data self reported? does the data rely on recall? were validated (e.g piloted questionnaires) tools used? what was the response rate and what do we know about non-responders? how many dropped out?
- Confounding: are confounders discussed and adjusted for?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2114e/2114e12c5a866097be925e530d659be74c751ba2" alt=""
What are we most concerned about when appraising a cross sectional study?
Cannot see temporal sequence with these studies as outcome and exposure measured at same time
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81c1d/81c1d50282fd6fb97b0fe11d2cf81aa7547d0af2" alt=""
What are some issues when we appraise ecological studies?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9efe2/9efe234c7a83a59867afa1646fa25f49e063fb34" alt=""
What are some critical appraisal tools we can use?
- CASP programme
- Newcastle-Ottowa Scale
What is the outcome measure of a case control study?
Odds ratio
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0b70/f0b708aacbb3d184cc3448a479e8d3ee71d3d9ab" alt=""
What are some issues we are concerned about when we appraise a case control study?
- Need a clear case and control definition
- Have they used medical records or self report to record exposure
- All the usual e.g is confounding discussed?
- Do they justify the number of cases and controls used?
What is the outcome measure of a cohort study?
- Allows for temporal sequence
- Odds ratio
- Risk ratio
- Incidence rate ratio
What are some issues we are concerned about when we appraise a cohort study?
- Are the exposed cohort from the same community as the non-exposed?
- If it is a historical cohort how was the data collected and how complete is it?
- Was the follow up period long enough?
- Can we be sure the participants were outcome free at the start of the study?
- Was follow up of participants adequate?
- What is the key finding, how precise is it and how applicable are the results to your population of interest?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25744/257441d6d998d0a799f636c4da4d029bac8ef877" alt=""
What should be the analysis in an RCT?
- Robust randomisation eliminates confounding so do intention to treat analysis to preserve randomisation to allow causal inferences to be made
- Blinding not always possible but if it is it eliminates bias
What are some issues we are concerned about when we appraise a RCT?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ee2e/3ee2e283d851c25a2e976da4f25aa4735ac5e500" alt=""
What are some of the key questions we need to ask when appraising a RCT?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe9c5/fe9c5e0dfbe59baf67f071556aeda6e9b18f7f84" alt=""
What do systematic reviews help to do and what are some issues we are concerned about when we appraise them?
Help to identify gaps and areas for further research
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e79ed/e79edaaa8596f0715005f72c79697d2fb78aaa25" alt=""
What are some of the key questions that we need to ask when appraising a systematic review?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5f77/a5f77f248cd23ed5a9556233365b5a5024b81c06" alt=""