19 Civil Trial and Evidence Flashcards
What is the usual sequence of events at trials?
- Claimant’s opening speech
- Claimant calls witnesses
- Sworn in or affirm
- Examination-in-chief (“X”)
- Witnesses will have signed witness statements
- These will be in the trial bundles
- Witness statements stand as their evidence-in-chief
- Cross-examination (“XX”) by the other side
- Re-examination (“RX”) by Claimant
- Ask judge to “release” the witness (if not likely to be needed again)
- Call next witness etc
- C tenders documentary evidence, hearsay etc. Usually in the trial bundles
- C closes its case: “That is the case for the Claimant”
- [Possible submission of no case to answer: rare in civil trials]
- Defendant calls witnesses
- Defence closing speech
- Claimant closing speech
- Judgment by judge
- Arguments over costs
- Possible summary assessment of costs [mainly fast track trials]
- Permission to appeal
Can judge dispose of opening address?
yes
What is the position in relation to closing speech?
E.g. if there was evidence, if there was not.
Norm D will put in evidence, in which case the order of closing speeches is:
- D first
- C last
Where D tenders no evidence:
- C first
- D last
Who will set the timetable for trial?
Trial timetable: designates how time available for trial should be used. It will be set by court in consultation with parties.
- Set ASAP after filing pre-trial checklists (typically at pre-trial review)
- Trial judge MAY set own timetable
- Trial judge MAY confirm/vary previous trial timetable
What is Testimony?
Testimony = statements of witness made orally in court + presented as evid of truth.
Direct Testimony (not same as direct evid) =
What is it?
statement of W about fact he claims to have direct, personal, first-hand knowledge.
Hearsay =
definition
statement other given by W offered as evid of truth of contents.
What is :
Real evidence
Doc evidence
Primary evidence
Secondary evidence
Real Evid = norm material object for inspection
Doc evid = docs for inspection, either real evid or hearsay/direct evid
Primary evid = evid of best kind (e.g. original doc).
Secondary evid = inferior kind of evid, e.g. copy time estimates.
Who has the BoP?
BURDEN OF PROOF
Gen rule = legal burden on party asserting + not denying. He who asserts MUST prove. So C must prove cause of action. D prove elements of Def. Whether burden discharged = tribunal of fact. C proves cause of action. D proves defence.
wHAT IS THE STANDARD OF PROOF?
Standard of proof = Balance of probabilities = “more probable than not”.
Are leading questions allowed?
Leading Q.s only allowed: In XX + against hostile W
Leading questions only allowed in examination in chief
- Formal matters
- Introductory matters
- Facts not in dispute
- Where counsel for other side indicated no objection to leading.
In the SMALL CLAIMS COURT – Strict rules of evidence DO NOT apply
Can pLANS,PHOTOGRAPHS OR MODELS BE USED?
Court MAY allow W to give evid through video link or other means.
Plans, photographs, Models
If plan, photograph or model NOT in
- Witness statement,
- Affidavit
- Expert’s report
- Given orally at trial
Shall NOT be receivable at trial UNLESS party given NOTICE to other parties (unless court orders otherwise).
Where party intends to use the PPM as EVIDENCE OF ANY FACT = he MUST give notice no later than latest date for serving W/S.
How much notice must parties give for plans, models, photographs want to be use.
Party MUST give 21 days before hearing if no W/S, he puts in evid solely to disprove an allegation made in a W/S. Where evid forms part of expert evid, he MUST give notice when expert’s report served.
Where party intends to use PPM FOR ANY OTHER REASON, he MUST give notice of 21 days before the hearing. Where party has given notice, he MUST give other party an opportunity to inspect it, + agree on its admission without further proof.
Can evidence be excluded on hearsay?
Evid MUST NOT be excluded on grounds its hearsay.
What must party proposing to adduce hearsay do?
WHat happens if he fails?
Party proposing to adduce hearsay MUST give notice of fact to other side + on request such particulars to the evid as reasonable and practicable, unless it falls outside the gen rule or parties agree/waive requirement. FAILURE = doesn’t affect admissibility but MAY be taken into account by court in costs and weight.
Where party adduces hearsay, other party MAY, with LEAVE, call that person as witness and cross-examine him on statement.
What are the considerations for thinking about weight of hearsay?
Considerations relevant to weighing hearsay evid
Court MUST have regard to circumstances from which inference MAY be drawn:
- Whether it would have been reasonable + practical to have produced the maker of original statement as W;
- Whether original statement made contemporaneously
- Whether evidence involves multiple hearsay
- Whether any person involved had motive to conceal or misrepresent matter;
- Whether original statement was an edited account or made in collaboration with another or for particular purpose.
- Whether circumstance suggest attempt to prevent proper evaluation of its weight.
- if NOTICE was give.