18 Public Health Policy Flashcards
Primary prevention
Reduce incidence
Stop the emergence of new cases of events
Ex: vaccination
Secondary prevention
Reduce prevalence
Early disease detection
Ex: screening
Tertiary prevention
Reduce the number/impact of complications
Ex: slowing the progression of MS, stroke rehabilitation
2 benefits of an expanded risk factor model
- Risk factors are unequally distributed, so this allows us to understand and locate the factors that may explain the unequal distribution
- Provides us with multiple key points where we can intervene to reduce the incidence of disease
Macroenvironmental exposures
Broad risk factors that affect the entire population
Ex: air pollution, water quality
Microenvironmental exposures
Things that affect the individual
Ex: diet, exercise, if you wear a seatbelt while driving
Policy action of health issues must consider which 4 things
Political considerations (political will)
Economic factors
Social values
Good evidence
Population approach
Lower the mean level of risk factor within the population to shift the whole distribution
Encourage everyone to change, shifting the entire distribution
High-Risk approach
Narrow group of people are targeted to change a very specific risk
Move high risk individuals into normal range
What are 5 factors that limit the benefits of the high risk approach?
Time Money Personal motivation Supportive family environment Supportive social environment
Advantages to the high risk approach
Provider and patient motivation
Therapies/approaches tailored to individual patients may be more effective and safe
Avoids those who are not at risk
Benefit-risk ratio favorable
Disadvantages to the high risk approach
Limited effectiveness
High cost
Change rests on individual
Effects are often temporary (deal with condition not root causes)
Only directed at high risk individuals, not moderate risk
Advantages to population approach
Broad impact on many people (high avoidable burden)
Cost effective
Collective rather than individual efforts
Easier to implement
Disadvantages to population approach
Low patient/physician motivation May not be publicly acceptable May not respect autonomy Cannot be tailored to individual needs May benefit some groups more than others