15 Systematic Reviews Flashcards

1
Q

4 reasons to do systematic reviews

A

Response to calls to organize knowledge
Efficient way to access a specific body of research
Explore differences between studies
Reliable basis for decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Evidence informed healthcare takes what 3 things into account?

A

Clinical expertise
Patient’s values
Research evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Narrative vs systematic reviews

  1. Question
  2. Sources and searches
  3. Selection
A
  1. NR: broad, SR: focused clinical question
  2. NR: not specified, biased, SR: comprehensive source and strategy explicitly stated
  3. NR: not specified, biased, SR: criterion-based, uniformly applied
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Narrative vs systematic reviews

  1. Appraisal
  2. Synthesis
  3. Inferences
A
  1. NR: variable, SR: rigorous critical appraisal
  2. NR: qualitative summary common. SR: qualitative summary plus or minus meta analyis
  3. NR: sometimes evidence based, SR: evidence-based
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are systematic reviews?

A

Synthesis of results of all available studies
Address a focused question
Use systematic and explicit methods to identify, select and appraise relevant research and collect/analyze data
Minimize potential biases at each step
They use well-defined protocol and methodological principles to attempt to reduce bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

5 advantages of systematic reviews

A
Digest large amounts of information
Assess consistency of results
Improve ability to detect an experimental effect
Increase precision in estimate of effect
Reduce random errors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

5 potential disadvantages of systematic reviews

A

Can be difficult to read and interpret
A poor systematic review may be given greater precedence than a well conducted RCT
The inclusion of inappropriate studies can lead to drowning of important effects
Increase systematic errors
Limited by reporting quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Time required for a systematic review

A

6 months

1200 hours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

5 steps of a systematic review

A
Formulate the review question
Identify studies
Select studies for inclusion
Appraise included studies
Synthesize the results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

PICOS

A
Population
Intervention (exposure)
Comparison
Outcome
Study designs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Importance of the review question (3)

A

Transparency
Minimises bias
Facilitates subsequent steps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which step is the key factor distinguishing systematic reviews from narrative reviews?

A

Identifying studies

Use a comprehensive literature search

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

3 different analytical methods

A

Narrative synthesis
Meta-analysis
Meta regression +

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Meta-analysis

A

Statistical analysis of a collection of independent studies

Quantitative part of systematic reviews

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly