171016 - Evaluation of Active Safety Flashcards
The Deming’s cycle explains how system development and evaluation may happen in a continuous loop to improve the system.
True
A validation plan is often more comprehensive than a test plan and may include human factor issues.
True
A cost-benefit analysis may be able to tell how much money society may save as the percentage of vehicles with AEB increases.
True
A TRL9 system is probably on the market, a TRL2 system may not even be a prototype.
True
Active safety develops by increasing the ODD and OEDR of the systems.
True
As a consequence, the validation plan of a system addresses increasingly more complex and various scenarios as the system develops.
True
Increasingly complex and costly test methodologies follow an active safety system development.
True
Computer simulations are increasingly supporting the development and evaluation of active safety systems.
True
Cooperative simulations can access the extent to which cooperative systems may impact traffic at different penetration rates.
True
Counterfactual simulations can estimate the safety benefit of a new active safety system even at low TRL/MRL.
True
Driver models are necessary for a counterfactual simulation if the purpose is to compare different warning strategies.
True
Counterfactual simulations may help determine if a new software upgrade for active safety (or AD) is safe.
True
One of the main advantages of driving simulations is the possibility to explore safety critical situation with good repeatability.
True
Test tracks can expose a vehicle to different environments such as slippery road.
True
The ecological validity of test-tracks and driving simulators is hard to measure and still to be proven.
True