13.2 International debt and international aid Flashcards
two wats of expressing a country’s debt
- a ratio of debt to a country’s GDP
- ratio of a country’s external debt to the value of its exports
causes of debt
- through trade deficit, value of imports>exports for period of time so need funding
- result of currency devaluation/foreign exchange issues
- rising prices of key imported commodities, e.g oil crisis of 1973
- inability to make repayment on international loans, e.g Argentina unable to repay IMF
- poor financial decision making by a gov due to inappropriate lending/borrowing in 1960s and excessive interest charges by creditors (e.g Argentina trying to develop infrastructure)
- following independence former colonies given large loans to develop infrastructure/internal industries to replace imports
- financial mismanagement of economy - high levels of military spending: e.g Iraq and Sadam Hussain
Example of UK local aid development project in LIC
Global Energy Transfer Feed-in Tariff (GETFiT) :
- main goal of assisting Uganda to pursue a climate resilient low-carbon development path by facilitating private sector investments in renewable electricity generation projects
- Programme budget: £25,800,000
Spend to date: £3,761,079
Successes:
1. Increased capacity: 156 MW of renewable energy to ugandas grid by 2021
2. job creation
3. mobilised over $450 million in private investment
4. CO2 reductions - estimated over 7 million tons over project lifetime
Example of UK emergency Aid
UK support for Iraqi victims of ISL :
-Key initiatives
1. Humanitarian Assistance: £300 million in humanitarian aid since 2014
2. Support for Survivors of Gender-Based Violence: document crims/provide survivor-centred support
3. Community Stabilization: investments in infrastructure repair, support for community groups
Tied aid example
UK Aid to Malysia to build Pergau dam:
- very controversial
- cost $600 milion and UK funded approx £230 million in aid
revealed later that the aid given by the UK was linked to a £1 billion arms deal between the two countries, where Malaysia agreed to purchase British military equipment in exchange for funding
- contributed to establishment of International Development Act 2022, prohibited tying aid to military objectives
Oxfam case study - aid donors
founded in 1942
Funding:
institutions/gov: UK DfID, EU, UN
public fundraising
Spending:
- all of its money directly or indirectly fighting the injustice of poverty
- every £1 Oxfam spends, 81p goes on their emergency, development and campaigning work, 12p is spent on running costs and 7p is invested to generate future income
Local development project:
Balaka District, Southern Malawi :
- improved food security, empower women, strengthen community resilience to climate change
Impacts:
- 40% increase in crop yields - better soil management/drought resistant crops
- households incomes up by average 25%
Cost:
- estimated $800,000 to $1,250,000
Oxfam LIC emergency aid project
hunger crisis in South Sudan :
- conflict caused fuel price/cost of living to rise
- poor harvest in late 2017 = 7.1 million facing extreme hunger
Responses:
- Supporting over 500,000 people
- Regular emergency food distributions
- Distribution of vouchers for canoes
- wash services: water purification systems to 20,00 households
- food distribution: immediate relief: 25,000 individuals
- longer term: fast growing seeds to 10,000 farmers to enable quick recovery
advantages of aid
- can save lives/help rebuild communities and housing after a disaster
- provision of medical training, medicines and equipment can improve health/standards of living as well as provision of clean water
- aid for agriculture can improve farming techniques, increase food production/ improve quality/quantity of food available
- aid for industrial development can create employment/improve infrastructure supporting countries in developing natural resources/power supplies
bilateral aid
aid given directly by the government of a donor country to a recipient country
multilateral aid
given by donor country to an international organisation, e.g World Bank, who uses it to assist developing countryes
relief aid
solve short term problems in recipient country
development aid
aims to develop the long-term capacity of the recipient country to help itself
tied aid
where receiving aid is conditional on purchasing goods/services from donor country
disadvantages of ties aid for recipient countries
- Higher Costs: Recipients must purchase goods/services from the donor country, often at inflated prices.
- Inefficiency: Donor priorities may not align with recipient needs, leading to unsuitable projects or goods.
- Stifled Local Growth: Excludes local businesses, reducing opportunities for domestic industries to grow.
- Donor-Centric Benefits: Significant portions of aid flow back to donor economies, limiting benefits for the recipient.
- Administrative Burdens: Compliance with donor conditions increases bureaucracy and delays.
- Reduced Aid Effectiveness: Higher costs and rigid conditions reduce the overall impact of aid.
- Corruption Risk: Contracts often favor donor-linked firms, undermining transparency.
- Long-Term Issues: Can lead to debt accumulation and distorted development priorities.
advantages of tied aid
- Guaranteed Resources: Provides access to specific goods, services, or technology.
- Faster Implementation: Ready-made solutions can expedite project execution.
- Technical Expertise: Advanced skills, technology, and training from the donor.
- Improved Relations: Strengthens diplomatic and economic ties with the donor country.
- Supports Large Projects: Enables financing and expertise for large-scale infrastructure.
- Capacity Building: Local workforce benefits from training and knowledge transfer.
- Stable Supply Chains: Ensures reliable access to goods and services.
- Donor Accountability: Oversight may reduce the risk of fund mismanagement.