13.2 International debt and international aid Flashcards

(32 cards)

1
Q

two ways of expressing a country’s debt

A
  • a ratio of debt to a country’s GDP
  • ratio of a country’s external debt to the value of its exports
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

causes of debt

A
  • through trade deficit, value of imports>exports for period of time so need funding
  • result of currency devaluation/foreign exchange issues
  • rising prices of key imported commodities, e.g oil crisis of 1973
  • inability to make repayment on international loans, e.g Argentina unable to repay IMF
  • due to war/conflict, e.g Ukraine has over $150 billion debt
  • poor financial decision making by a gov due to inappropriate lending/borrowing in 1960s and excessive interest charges by creditors (e.g Argentina trying to develop infrastructure)
  • following independence former colonies given large loans to develop infrastructure/internal industries to replace imports
  • financial mismanagement of economy - high levels of military spending: e.g Iraq and Sadam Hussain for during war/conflict: about 100 billion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Example of UK local aid development project in LIC

A

Global Energy Transfer Feed-in Tariff (GETFiT) :
- main goal of assisting Uganda to pursue a climate resilient low-carbon development path by facilitating private sector investments in renewable electricity generation projects
- Programme budget: £25,800,000
Spend to date: £3,761,079
Successes:
1. Increased capacity: 156 MW of renewable energy to ugandas grid by 2021
2. job creation
3. mobilised over $450 million in private investment
4. CO2 reductions - estimated over 7 million tons over project lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Example of UK emergency Aid

A

Turkey-Syria Earthquake (2023):
- 77 UK search and rescue specialists deployed in first 24 hours
- £43 million in humanitarian assistance
- UK emergency medical team deployed/supplies given out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tied aid example

A

UK Aid to Malysia to build Pergau dam:
- very controversial
- cost $600 milion and UK funded approx £230 million in aid
revealed later that the aid given by the UK was linked to a £1 billion arms deal between the two countries, where Malaysia agreed to purchase British military equipment in exchange for funding
- contributed to establishment of International Development Act 2022, prohibited tying aid to military objectives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Oxfam case study - aid donors

A

founded in 1942
Funding:
institutions/gov: UK DfID, EU, UN
public fundraising
Spending:
- all of its money directly or indirectly fighting the injustice of poverty
- every £1 Oxfam spends, 81p goes on their emergency, development and campaigning work, 12p is spent on running costs and 7p is invested to generate future income

Local development project:
Balaka District, Southern Malawi :
- improved food security, empower women, strengthen community resilience to climate change
Impacts:
- 40% increase in crop yields - better soil management/drought resistant crops
- households incomes up by average 25%

Cost:
- estimated $800,000 to $1,250,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Oxfam LIC emergency aid project

A

hunger crisis in South Sudan :
- conflict caused fuel price/cost of living to rise
- poor harvest in late 2017 = 7.1 million facing extreme hunger

Responses:
- Supporting over 500,000 people
- Regular emergency food distributions
- Distribution of vouchers for canoes
- wash services: water purification systems to 20,00 households
- food distribution: immediate relief: 25,000 individuals
- longer term: fast growing seeds to 10,000 farmers to enable quick recovery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

advantages of aid

A
  • can save lives/help rebuild communities and housing after a disaster
  • provision of medical training, medicines and equipment can improve health/standards of living as well as provision of clean water
  • aid for agriculture can improve farming techniques, increase food production/ improve quality/quantity of food available
  • aid for industrial development can create employment/improve infrastructure supporting countries in developing natural resources/power supplies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

bilateral aid

A

aid given directly by the government of a donor country to a recipient country

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

multilateral aid

A

given by donor country to an international organisation, e.g World Bank, who uses it to assist developing countryes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

relief aid

A

solve short term problems in recipient country

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

development aid

A

aims to develop the long-term capacity of the recipient country to help itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

tied aid

A

where receiving aid is conditional on purchasing goods/services from donor country

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

disadvantages of ties aid for recipient countries

A
  1. Higher Costs: Recipients must purchase goods/services from the donor country, often at inflated prices.
  2. Inefficiency: Donor priorities may not align with recipient needs, leading to unsuitable projects or goods.
  3. Stifled Local Growth: Excludes local businesses, reducing opportunities for domestic industries to grow.
  4. Donor-Centric Benefits: Significant portions of aid flow back to donor economies, limiting benefits for the recipient.
  5. Administrative Burdens: Compliance with donor conditions increases bureaucracy and delays.
  6. Reduced Aid Effectiveness: Higher costs and rigid conditions reduce the overall impact of aid.
  7. Corruption Risk: Contracts often favor donor-linked firms, undermining transparency.
  8. Long-Term Issues: Can lead to debt accumulation and distorted development priorities.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

advantages of tied aid

A
  1. Guaranteed Resources: Provides access to specific goods, services, or technology.
  2. Faster Implementation: Ready-made solutions can expedite project execution.
  3. Technical Expertise: Advanced skills, technology, and training from the donor.
  4. Improved Relations: Strengthens diplomatic and economic ties with the donor country.
  5. Supports Large Projects: Enables financing and expertise for large-scale infrastructure.
  6. Capacity Building: Local workforce benefits from training and knowledge transfer.
  7. Stable Supply Chains: Ensures reliable access to goods and services.
  8. Donor Accountability: Oversight may reduce the risk of fund mismanagement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

advantages of relief aid

A
  1. Immediate Assistance: Provides urgent help during crises (e.g., natural disasters, conflicts, or pandemics).
  2. Saves Lives: Offers essential supplies like food, water, and medicine to prevent loss of life.
  3. Supports Recovery: Helps stabilize affected areas by providing temporary shelters and rebuilding efforts.
  4. Prevents Further Crises: Mitigates risks like disease outbreaks or famine by addressing immediate needs.
  5. Boosts Local Morale: Demonstrates international solidarity, improving hope and resilience in communities.
  6. Quick Mobilization: Rapid deployment of resources and expertise to areas in need.
  7. Restores Infrastructure: Facilitates the repair of critical infrastructure, such as roads and hospitals, after disasters.
17
Q

Disadvantages of Relief Aid

A
  1. Dependency Risk: Prolonged reliance on aid can undermine self-sufficiency.
  2. Inefficiency: Poor coordination may result in duplicated efforts or wasted resources.
  3. Short-Term Focus: Emphasis on immediate needs may overlook long-term development.
  4. Local Economy Disruption: Free goods can undercut local markets, harming local producers.
  5. Mismanagement: Aid may be diverted due to corruption or lack of oversight.
  6. Inappropriate Aid: Supplies or services may not align with the recipient’s actual needs.
  7. Cultural Insensitivity: Aid delivery may disregard local customs or social structures.
  8. Environmental Impact: Improper waste management of relief materials can harm the environment.
18
Q

Advantages of Development Aid

A
  1. Economic Growth: Provides funding for infrastructure, industries, and projects that stimulate economic development.
  2. Poverty Reduction: Helps improve living standards by supporting health, education, and social programs.
  3. Capacity Building: Strengthens local institutions and human resources through training and education.
  4. Improved Healthcare: Provides access to better healthcare services, reducing disease and improving life expectancy.
  5. Infrastructure Development: Funds critical infrastructure projects such as roads, schools, and hospitals.
  6. Technology Transfer: Introduces new technologies and knowledge that boost productivity and innovation.
  7. Environmental Protection: Supports sustainable development practices and environmental conservation efforts.
  8. Social Stability: Helps reduce social tensions by addressing basic needs like food, water, and education.
19
Q

Disadvantages of Development Aid

A
  1. Dependency: Long-term reliance on aid can reduce motivation for self-sufficiency and local initiative.
  2. Inefficiency: Mismanagement, corruption, or poor planning can result in wasted resources.
  3. Distortion of Local Markets: Aid can disrupt local economies by flooding markets with free or subsidized goods.
  4. Debt Accumulation: Loans as part of aid packages can lead to unsustainable debt burdens.
  5. Cultural Insensitivity: Aid programs may ignore local customs, needs, or priorities, leading to ineffective solutions.
  6. Political Influence: Aid may be tied to political or economic conditions that benefit the donor rather than the recipient.
  7. Unbalanced Development: Aid may focus on certain sectors or regions, leaving others underdeveloped.
  8. Environmental Impact: Some aid-funded projects may harm the environment due to inadequate planning or sustainability considerations.
20
Q

Advantages of Bilateral Aid

A
  1. Tailored Assistance: Aid can be customized to meet the specific needs and priorities of the recipient country.
  2. Stronger Diplomatic Relations: Fosters closer ties between the donor and recipient countries, promoting political and economic cooperation.
  3. Direct Support: Allows for more effective monitoring and oversight, ensuring that aid reaches its intended recipients.
  4. Faster Implementation: Bilateral aid often leads to quicker disbursement and implementation of projects due to fewer intermediaries.
  5. Sustainability: Focuses on long-term development goals, such as infrastructure, healthcare, or education, aligned with the recipient’s development plans.
  6. Flexibility: Allows the donor and recipient to negotiate terms and conditions that are mutually beneficial.
  7. Leveraging Expertise: Donor countries often provide specialized knowledge, technical support, and resources in areas where they excel.
21
Q

Disadvantages of Bilateral Aid

A
  1. Political Influence: Donor countries may use aid to advance their own political, economic, or strategic interests, which may not align with the recipient’s needs.
  2. Dependency: Recipients may become reliant on aid from one country, limiting their ability to develop independently.
  3. Conditionalities: Bilateral aid may come with strict conditions, such as adopting certain policies, which may not suit the recipient country’s context.
  4. Unequal Power Dynamics: The donor country may have more influence over how aid is used, leading to projects that benefit the donor more than the recipient.
  5. Lack of Coordination: Bilateral aid can sometimes result in duplication of efforts or inefficiency if not properly coordinated with other donors.
  6. Short-Term Focus: Some bilateral aid programs may prioritize immediate results over long-term sustainable development.
  7. Cultural Insensitivity: Donor-driven projects may not always consider the local culture, customs, or priorities, reducing their effectiveness.
22
Q

Advantages of Multilateral Aid

A
  1. Broader Support: Multilateral aid comes from multiple countries and organizations, reducing reliance on a single donor and spreading risk.
  2. Larger Financial Resources: Collective contributions from various donors result in larger sums of money, enabling more extensive development programs.
  3. Expertise and Coordination: Multilateral organizations (e.g., UN, World Bank) bring technical expertise, experience, and effective coordination among various actors.
  4. Neutrality: Aid is often seen as more neutral, as it comes from a group of donors, reducing political influence from a single country.
  5. Global Development Focus: Multilateral aid focuses on global issues, ensuring a broader, long-term vision that addresses diverse challenges like health, education, and poverty.
  6. Greater Accountability: Multilateral organizations tend to have more rigorous monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, ensuring aid is used effectively.
  7. Shared Risk: By involving multiple donors, the financial risk is shared, making it easier for recipient countries to access aid.
23
Q

Disadvantages of Multilateral Aid

A
  1. Bureaucracy: Multilateral organizations often have complex administrative processes, which can delay aid delivery and project implementation.
  2. Lack of Flexibility: Aid may be tied to specific conditions or global initiatives that don’t align with the recipient country’s immediate needs.
  3. Impersonal Assistance: Multilateral aid may not be as tailored to the specific context of the recipient country, making it less effective.
  4. Donor Influence: Although less politically driven than bilateral aid, multilateral aid may still be influenced by powerful donor countries, skewing priorities.
  5. Coordination Challenges: With multiple donors and stakeholders involved, coordination can become difficult, leading to duplication or inefficiency.
  6. Slow Decision-Making: Decision-making in multilateral organizations can be slow due to the need to reach consensus among diverse donors.
  7. Debt Accumulation: Some multilateral aid comes in the form of loans, potentially increasing the recipient country’s debt burden if not managed properly.
24
Q

reasons for high levels of debt in Uganda

A
  • civil war during 1970s, meant gov needed finance to purchase weapons
  • during 1980s, global interest rates doubled, massively increasing repayment of loans
25
impact of debt repayments on Uganda
- education budget reduced by **12%** - tax increase- VAT from **18 to 19%**: **poorest 10% of Ugandans are spending 80% of their income on basic consumption**, meaning any increase in taxes or inflation significantly reduces their purchasing power - high inflation: **10.4%** - rising food prices = malnutrition
26
Impacts of debt cancellation on Uganda
- Spending on public services risen by **20% overall – 40% extra on education and 70% on healthcare** - free primary schooling: education - **2.2 million gained access to clean water**
27
what is the international debt crisis
- due to **odious debt**: due to HICs loaning to dictators/other corrupt leaders when it was known the money would be wasted - **colonialism** left many former colonies with high/unfair levels of debt when they became independent: e.g **Haiti had to pay France 150 million france to receive independence** - **Arab-Israeli war of 1973-1974** saw sharp **increase in oil prices** and so resulted in high levels of investment by banks offering relatively low interest loans to poor countries and encouraged them to grow crops to pay back loans with exports - however, **recession in 1980s** = rising inflation and interest rates in Western countries so demand for exports fell and meant LICs unable to pay back interest
28
strengths/weaknesses of debt relief
strengths: - allow country's loans to be reschedule to make them more manageable - make country's economy more competitive: important for growth - improve FDI investment by removing trade/investment restrictions - boost foreign exchange - promoting exports - reduce gov deficit: cuts in spending - increased gov spending in important areas such as education: weaknesses: - may result in moral hazard: govs just take out more loans if think they will be bailed out again in future - only temporary solution: future problems - political issues: if country still debted to loaner in other ways?
29
HIPC initiative
- heavily indebted poor countries - 39 developing countries with high levels of poverty and debt which are eligible for special assistance from World Bank and IMF - provides debt relief and low-interest loans to cancel/reduce external debt repayments to sustainable levels - to be considered must have unsustainable debt and assistance conditional on gov meeting range of targets - 2005, **US $40 billion debt in Africa** cancelled after G8 summit meeting
30
Micro credit: Grassroots aid
**Grameen Bank**: - small loans to very poor people for self-employment projects to generate income - crop loan, livestock loan etc - **94%** villages in Bangladesh have Grameen branch - very low interest -**97%** to women
31
example of a private donor of aid
**Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation**: - main focus: healthcare/poverty - **7 billion in grants** - 40 programme strategies
32
China aid
**One belt, one road** initiative: - massive trade/infrastructure project connecting dozens of economies BUT - punishing interest rates - strings attached: market entry for cheap chinese goods/access to lucrative resources (oil/gas reserves in Kazakhstan) - Chinese companies employ chinese people - infrastructure contries dont need