13 - Intellectual Assessment Flashcards
g
- Intelligence, underlying and drove performance on all tests but couldn’t explain variance in tests
- Charles Spearman
- REFLECTIVE CONCEPT: construct is the cause of the measures/outcome
Two-Factor Theory
- Spearman
- Because g couldn’t explain all variance in test
- Variation between people on all cognitive tasks is a function of two factors; g (general intelligence) and s (test-specific variance)
Louis Thurstone
- Samples were more restricted, so he observed lower correlations among skills compared to Spearman
- Hypothesized that tests get at multiple different facets rather than a general factor
- Includes independent, lower-order processes like memory, verbal skills, spatial skills, etc.
Fluid vs Crystallized Intelligence
- Raymond Cattell
- Fluid: responding adaptively, increases with age
- Neural integrity, connectedness; inborn
- Cognitive processing capability
- More affected by effort and attention than crystal.
- More likely to be impaired following brain injury
- Crystallized: preserved with age
- Based on life experiences, learned skills, vocab
- Historical = what you had prior to training
- Current = domains of expert knowledge and skills
Cattell-Horn-Carroll Model
NARROW ABILITIES are influenced by BROADER ABILITIES which are influenced by something general and common to all of those (G)
Bifactor Model
- Variance left after g is extracted from a performance can be attributed to common variance among tests AND additional primary factors
- Primary factors are orthogonal (independent) of variance due to “g”
- Bifactor: g and primary factors
Purpose of Intelligence Tests
- Predict future academic achievement
- Characterize functional impairment
- Can influence approaches to clinical assessment (constraints)
- Can influence approaches to treatment
Intelligence vs Achievement vs Aptitude
Intelligence = what you have
Achievement = what you do with it
Aptitude = what you’re capable of with maximum training and opportunity
“Intelligence is what intelligence tests measure”
Interpretation of intelligence tests is influenced by theory/construct
Concerns with Intelligence Tests
- Construct validity: do they assess all aspects of the construct (of intelligence)? They don’t assess creativity, emotional intelligence, etc…
- Participants are encouraged to put forth max effort, but that may not be representative.
- Scores can be influenced by other factors
- Do they have predictive utility
Signs vs Samples
Signs = behavior is viewed as a sign of some underlying characteristic
Samples = focus on operations/behaviors with no underlying causes inferred
McClelland’s Goal
- Argued that intelligence doesn’t predict outcomes
- Thought we should focus on traits and competencies, and that tests are biased
- Goal was to use criterion sample to reduce bias, but it actually increases it (firefighters without training)
IQ Formula
(mental age) / (chronic age) X 100
- Is a ratio (true, absolute zero)
- Deviation IQ is standard score (mean = 100, SD = 15)
Score Types & Functions
Raw Score: pure assessment, but can’t compare across measures easily
Norm-referenced: compare person’s score to norms
Percentile Rank
Transforms/Standardizes scores
Interval vs Ratio Data
Interval: equal spacing between, can be summed but NOT MULTIPLIED
Ratio: ordered with meaningful distances, with a true zero. Can be multiplied.