12 - Public Health and Health Promotion Interventions Flashcards
WHO defines health as
“A resource for everyday life, not the objective of living. Health is a positive concept emphasising social and personal resources, as well as physical capacities”.
Public Health
science and art of preventing disease, prolonging life and
promoting health through organised efforts of society
Health Promotion
process of enabling people to increase control over the determinants of health and thereby improve their health
Health Promotion involves
- clinical intervention
- health education
- healthy public policy
- community development
4 Levels of Prevention
primordial prevention
primary prevention
secondary prevention
tertiary prevention
Primordial Prevention
Prevention of factors promoting the emergence of lifestyles, behaviours, exposure patterns which contribute to increased risk of disease.
Primary Prevention
Actions to prevent the onset of disease. To limit exposure to risk factors by individual behaviour change and by actions in the community. Includes health promotion (e.g. health education, prescriptive diets) and specific protection (e.g. vaccination)
Secondary Prevention
To halt progression once the illness is already established. Early detection followed by prompt, effective treatment. Special consideration of asymptomatic individuals.
Tertiary Prevention
rehabilitation of people with established disease to minimise residual disability and complications. Quality of life action even if disease cannot be cured.
2 Main Approaches to Disease Prevention
HIGH RISK – identifying those in special need “targeted rescue operation” (Geoffrey Rose, 1992), then controlling exposure (e.g. reducing house dust mite in the home of asthmatic child) or providing protection against effect of exposure (vaccination).
POPULATION – begins with recognition that the occurrence of common diseases and exposures reflects the behaviour and circumstances of society as a whole.
Prevention Paradox
Many people exposed to a small risk may generate more disease than the few exposed to a large risk
Therefore, when many people receive a small benefit the total benefit may be large
However, individual inconvenience may be high to the many when benefit may only be to a few.
Strengths of High Risk Approach
Effective (high motivation of individual and physician) Efficient (cost-effective use of resources)
Benefit : risk ratio is favourable
Appropriate to individual
Easy to evaluate
Weaknesses of High Risk Approach
Palliative and temporary (misses a large amount of disease)
Risk prediction – not accurate
Limited potential – misses out on spill over of info
Hard to change individual behaviours
Strengths of Population Approach
Equitable (Attributable risk may be high where risk is low if a lot of people are exposed to that low risk)
Radical
Large potential for population
Behaviourally appropriate
Weaknesses of Population Approach
Small advantage to individual
Poor motivation of subject
Poor motivation of physician
Benefit : risk ratio worrisome