1. The Quest for Leverage Flashcards
Equity
The providers of shareholder funds (equity) have an ownership interest in a company.
Bringing in more shareholders means diluting that ownership
Also an inherently expensive form of financing - shareholders expect to share in the success of the company and therefore their returns
This may be in the form of dividends
debt
Providers of debt expect to receive a pre-agreed rate of interest no matter how well the company does.
Interest might even fall if the company does well as it is then considered lower risk
> leverage or gearing
WACC
a) debt reduces the cost of financing for a company
b) some companies struggle to raise debt compared to others
The equation:
WACC = (MV of equity/total MV of equity & debt x cost of equity) + ((MV of debt/total MV of equity & debt x cost of debt) *1-corporate tax rate)
How do we know the cost of equity?
This is the return need to be paid to investors to get them to invest in the company
> CAPM model
> Low risk = low cost of equity and vice versa
> Big oil exploration can be high risk (high cost of equity) as it might spend lots to find oil wells that turn out to be empty
Tax benefit of debt
The taxable profit of a company is calculated after loan interest has been deducted. Tax incentive
the net, after tax, interest rate on debt is the gross interest rate * (1-tax rate)
Why upstream exploration companies tend to rely on equity
the risk of exploration being unsuccessful and the fact that the company will mainly consume cash, rather than generating, means that lenders will not be prepared to provide debt funding
> lenders want to see a predictable source of cashflow
Mezzanine finance
Upstream start up might be able to access mezzanine finance
> called such because it sits between equity and debt “floors” in a companies capital structure
> has some features of debt, some of equity
e.g. a mezzanine lender might agree to accept a low rate of interest and/or allow the interest to build up until the borrower begins to generate cash
> Mezzanine debt often hs a so-called “bullet” repayment basis - all the principal is repaid on the final maturity date of the loan
> may also be convertible - can be exchanged for shares in the borrower on the pre-agreed basis (perhaps at a pre-agreed price)
> mezzanine debt likely to be expensive because of the risk being accepted by the lender. A convertible loan also threatens to dilute the ownership of the original equity investors
If an upstream start up is successful
More debt doors open…
Once the oil has been found, seismic studies done, government approval made etc
structured finance teams of commercial banks will be willing to consider being part of the financing of production
> this will be on a project finance basis with the lenders interest payments and debt repayments being dependent on the cashflow of the asset being developed
oil field development finance
and especially single-field development finance is Among the riskiest form of financing by the banks
> given this reserve risk, banks will insist on using conservative reserve and production estimates when calculating projected field cashflow
> access to this source of financing would be huge for an upstream startup as it is not inexpensive and not the most flexible source of debt
Costs associated with single field financing
would require a lot of documentation and security cost. A lot of legal fees would entail when trying to squeeze more value out of the asset
does allow access to a lot of gearing however > would then not dilute equity interests or involve sharing of performance upside
Once the startup has assets through
the exploration, appraisal, development production cycle
the portfolio of field interests will grow
> leads to a steady reducing of risk concentration
Reserve based lending
commercial bank lenders that are prepared to lend against a portfolio of oil and gas assets rather than against the projected cashflow of a single field
“RBL or Borrowing based finance”
> requires less cumbersome, less expensive documentation / security structures
> likely to insist on the most conservative reserve and production figures
> the funds borrowed under RBL terms do not have to be dedicated to the development of particular fields - they are available for general corporate purposes and can even be spent on exploration
> a start-up would wish to move to RBL as soon as it can to give it access to flexible funding at a lower cost than is possible for single-project financing
Downsides of RBL
Lenders will require a forecasting of expenditures production and cashews at least every 6 months and anytime there is a change in portfolio assets
Because of this time consuming-ness and need to add technical consultants, companies will wish to persuade lenders they are “corporate”
Being “corporate”
assets have a stable cashflow
track-record of successful exploration
satisfactory financial history
good reserve replacement etc
> if banks agree a firm can be considered this, responsibility of the account relationship goes away from the banks structures finance team to the corporate teams
> facilities to the borrower will now largely be approved on the basis of the companies historical performance rather than its projected cashflows
with an oil company however, the future can never be ignored
corporate loan facilities
almost certainly will be cheaper than borrowings against future cashflows
will also avoid much tie and resource-intensive projection work associated with PF and RBLs
once a company reaches an appropriate scale and credit quality it may also decide to issue corporate bonds directly into the investor market
> needs a borrower credit rating from agencies