1. Social EQs Flashcards

1
Q

It is Ani’s first day in a new job and he spends a lot of time watching to see what his colleagues are doing, so that he will fit in with them and be liked. Explain Ani’s behaviour in terms of compliance. (2 marks)

A

Compliance refers to behaviour that involves going along with the majority, even if privately their views are not accepted. (1) He wants to fit in and be liked, so will change his behaviour to be like the others but does not change his beliefs. (1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain what is meant by internalisation. (3 marks)

A

Internalisation is where you accept the group’s beliefs as yours (1). You change both your public and private views (1) and it is a permanent change as you continue to think this even when not in the group (1).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain what is meant by compliance. (3 marks)

A

Compliance is where you go along with the group to fit in (1) even if you don’t really believe their view point (1) for example, in Asch’s study, many of the naïve participants went along with the wrong answer so as not to look stupid (1).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A group of students has to decide what to do with the money left over in their school fund. Most of them want to give the money to a local charity. However, two students, Lisa and Sean, want to buy a pool table for the common room.
Briefly explain how two factors might affect whether or not Lisa and Sean will conform to the rest of the group. (4 marks)

A

If the group size (1) is large / small this will increase / decrease the likelihood that Lisa and Sean will conform to the group (1).

Social support may affect conformity (1). As Lisa and Sean agree with each other, this will decrease the likelihood that they will conform to the rest of the group (1).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Most research into conformity takes place in a laboratory. Outline one strength of conducting research into conformity in a laboratory. (2 marks)

A

One strength of conducting research in a laboratory is that it allows the experimenter to control the variables, such as group size and difficulty of the task. (1) This manipulation of the IV allows conclusions to be drawn about cause and effect, and what the variables are that influence conformity. (1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outline one method that psychologists have used to study conformity. (2 marks)

A

Laboratory experiment (such as those carried out by Asch) (1) where confederates deliberately gave the wrong answer to see if the naïve participant conformed (1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain one limitation of this method. (2 marks)

A

Lab experiments lack ecological validity (1) this means that the findings cannot be generalised to the real world (1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Suggest an appropriate way of overcoming this limitation. (2 marks)

A

To overcome lack of ecological validity conduct the experiment in the real world (1) by setting up a field experiment so people behave as they would do normally (1).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Marcus wants to persuade his group of friends to go travelling in the summer but the rest of the group want to go on a beach holiday. Suggest how Marcus might use the three minority behaviours to persuade his friends to go travelling. (3 marks)

A
  1. Consistency = 2. keep on repeating the same message about how great travelling is
  2. Commitment = 4. explain how he is taking time and working hard to plan the trip
  3. Flexibility = 6. agree to go to the beach on the travelling holiday
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A senior army instructor is advising new instructors how to ensure discipline in training classes. He says, ‘Always wear your instructor jacket and stand up close when giving instructions. Make them all understand who has responsibility for the exercise. Serious problems should always be dealt with in the instructors’ office.’

Referring to research into obedience, explain three reasons why the instructor’s advice should be effective. (6 marks)

A
  • Uniform – Presence of a uniform, in this case the instructor’s jacket, conveys legitimate authority, as in Milgram’s experiment where the experimenter had a lab coat.
  • Proximity – standing up close means that people are more likely to follow instructions, as in Milgram’s experiment where the authority figure was more effective when in the same room
  • Location – the use of the instructor’s office again conveys the force of legitimate authority as in the Milgram’s study where Yale was more likely to result in obedience than a downtown setting.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Jenny is a psychology teacher who works with six other teachers in the department. Jenny believes strongly that homework should not be graded as it distracts students from reading verbal feedback on their work. She would like her colleagues to stop grading work. The other members of the department do not agree but have told Jenny they are willing to have a meeting about it. Using your knowledge of minority influence, explain how Jenny might be able to persuade the rest of the department to accept her view. (6 marks)

A

Jenny should demonstrate consistency by not deviating from her view that not grading work is a good idea despite social pressure – she could point out that this is a view that she has held throughout her teaching career

  • Jenny should demonstrate commitment by placing herself at some risk / inconvenience – she may volunteer to field criticisms from students, parents, other departments, etc. This will draw more attention to her ‘cause’ (augmentation principle)
  • Jenny should demonstrate flexibility by adapting her view / accepting other valid counterarguments. Perhaps some pieces of work could be ungraded but not all – for instance, grading mock exams but not homework
  • Over time, the rest of the department may become ‘converted’ (snowball effect) – for example, if Jenny’s students start to perform particularly well
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline what is meant by ‘agentic state’ as an explanation for obedience. (2 marks)

A

When a person acts on behalf of an authority figure (1) The actor feels no personal responsibility (1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

State one ethical issue with Milgram’s experiment and expain how to deal with it? (2 marks)

A

Deception (1) could be dealt with by debreifing the participant. It would have to be explained why it was necessary to deceive them and answer any questions that they might have wanted to ask, as well as reassuring them. (1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In a hospital, you are very likely to obey a nurse. However, if you meet her outside the hospital, for example in a shop, you are much less likely to obey.

Using your knowledge of how people resist pressures to obey, explain why you are less likely to obey the nurse outside the hospital. (Total 4 marks)

A

One reason you are less likely to obey the nurse outside the hospital is because the legitmacy of authority may not be recognised, (1) especially if there is no uniform. (1) Another reason you are less likely to obey the nurse outside the hospital is because the location (1) may not be legitimate (1) for the nurse to give an order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain what is meant by locus of control. (4 marks)

A

Locus of control is how much a person believes that they have control over events that happen in their lives. (1) This is usually measured along a scale with internal control at one end and external control at the other. (1) Internal control refers to those people who see that they have a great deal of control over their own behaviour and will take responsibility for their own actions. (1) External control refers to those who believe that their behaviour is controlled by other forces such as luck or fate. (1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why does an internal locus of control mean you are less likely to conform? (3 marks)

A

Research has suggested that internal LOC people believe that they are in control of their environment and are less likely to conform. (1) These personality types are much more likely to behave independently. (1) Attributional style allows resistance to the pressure to conform. (1)

17
Q

Briefly outline and evaluate the authoritarian personality as an explanation of obedience to authority. (4 marks)

A

A personality type consisting of traits whereby individuals are obedient to those of a higher status. (1) These individuals have conventional views and have strict adherence to social values. This personality is associated with individuals who have experienced strict upbringings. (1) However it is hard to establish cause and effect between struct upbringings and authoritarianism, the relationship is simply correlational. (1) Furthermore, this explanation is unable to account for obedience of larger groups and whole societies (1)

18
Q

Many people have criticised Zimbardo’s prison study.
Identify and briefly discuss two reasons why people have criticised Zimbardo’s prison
study. (6 marks) PLAN

A

Possible criticisms:
* Ethics – psychological harm – participants soon became distressed
* Zimbardo himself took part in the action/was a participant observer.

Possible discussion points:
* whether or not the distress should have been anticipated
* whether or not the consent gained was sufficiently informed
* Zimbardo’s own behaviour affected the way in which events unfolded, thus the validity of
the findings could be questioned
* use of examples from the study to support argument and elaborate on the criticisms given.

19
Q

Explain what is meant by social change. (2 marks)

A

Whole societies, (not just individuals) change (1) Adopt new attitudes, beliefs or behaviours through minority influence processes e.g snowball effect (1)

20
Q

Steph’s psychology teacher is leaving at the end of term. Steph would like to organise
a surprise fancy dress party for her, but the rest of the class are not convinced that it
is a good idea.
Use your knowledge of two or more factors affecting minority influence to explain
how Steph can persuade the rest of her class to accept her idea. (6 marks)

A
  • Steph should demonstrate consistency by not deviating from her view that the party is a good idea despite social pressure – she could point out that this is an idea she has had for some time/since she
    knew the teacher was leaving
  • Steph should demonstrate commitment by placing herself at some risk/inconvenience – she may volunteer to pay for the refreshments/present for the teacher etc. This will draw more attention to her ‘cause’ (augmentation principle)
  • Steph should demonstrate flexibility by adapting her view/accepting other valid counterarguments, perhaps agreeing to change the party for her teacher, eg not fancy dress/not a surprise party
  • over time, the rest of the class may become ‘converted’ (snowball effect) – for example, if Steph’s friends start to change their mind, then others follow
21
Q

Outline two limitations of Zimbardo’s study into conformity to social roles. [4 marks]

A

This study suffers from a lack of ethical consideration (1) - Zimbardo’s participants failed to leave the study in the same way they entered. Furthermore, they were exposed to intense mental harm, shown as one participant had to be removed from the study. (1)

This study also suffers from a lack of ecological validity (1) - despite Zimbardo going to lengths to making his study accurate to real life, but many aspects of real prison life were missed, for example the fear of longer sentences, lack of renumeration and the guilt of committing a crime (1)

22
Q

Outline and explain the findings of Milgram’s investigation into the effect of location on
obedience. (4 marks)

A

Measured obedience using electric shock experiment: change of venue to run-down building (1) obedience levels dropped by 17.5% (accept 65% at Yale vs 47.5% in run-down office) (1) The status of the location changed the participant’s perception of the legitimacy of the authority of the
investigator (1)
* higher authority at Yale than in the run-down office led to higher obedience levels. Lower authority in run-down building led to lower levels of obedience. (1)

23
Q

Apart from ethical issues, briefly evaluate the methodology of Milgram’s research into
obedience. (4 marks)

A

Can easily be replicated (1), therefore reliability can be assessed (1)
Demand characteristics (1) may cause participants to behave in ways that are not normal (1)

24
Q

A teacher wanted to investigate the attitudes of students in her school to the school’s box
homework policy. She used a volunteer sample of students from the school. All the
students who volunteered were over 16 years of age. The students were interviewed
in groups of four.

Write a brief consent form that would have been suitable to obtain informed consent
from the participants in this study.
The consent form should:
* include some detail of what participants might expect to happen
* refer to ethical issues. (4 marks)

A

Detail about what they would be asked to do, eg attend an interview with three other students asking questions about their attitudes to the school’s homework policy (1)
* will require the participant’s agreement/could be written as a form that participants need to sign (1)
* no pressure to consent/they can withdraw at any time (1)
* their data will be kept confidential and anonymous. (1)

25
Q

One of the participants, Ava, strongly believed that the amount of homework she was
set was fair. However, when the teacher interviewed her with her three friends, the
friends said they thought they had too much homework. Ava also said she thought
there was too much homework.
Use your knowledge of conformity to explain one reason for Ava’s behaviour. (2 marks)

A
  • Ava wanted the approval of her friends so she agreed with them about having too much
    homework in order to be liked – normative social influence (1)
  • Although Ava privately disagreed with her friends about the amount of homework she was set, she publicly agreed with them – compliance (1)
  • Ava wanted to have affinity with the group as they were her friends – identification (1)
  • Ava was influenced by her three friends as three is the optimum number for conformity – Asch’s research. (1)
26
Q

A teacher was absent and left work for students to complete during the lesson. Some
students in the class did not do the work their teacher had left for them.
Use one possible explanation of resistance to social influence to explain why this
happened. (4 marks)

A

Locus of control: (1)
*disobedience is more likely to occur in those who have an internal locus of control (1)
* the students who disobeyed the instructions may all have had this personality trait in common (1)
* this meant they relied on their own judgement of whether to complete the work, rather than the teacher’s (1)

27
Q

Fewer and fewer people use single-use plastic items, such as water bottles and plastic
straws.
Using your knowledge of social influence processes in social change, explain why fewer
and fewer people are using single-use plastic items. (6 marks)

A

(1) Minority influence processes:
* examples of the influence of environmental campaign groups/celebrities and how they may convince the majority through consistency, commitment (augmentation principle), flexibility (1)
* the snowball effect – how behaviour/views on use of plastic change gradually over time. (1)
(1) Conformity processes:
* normative social influence/compliance – the group norm among young people particularly is to care
about the environment; people who go against this norm (by ignoring the costs to the planet) risk rejection from the group/are less likely to fit in (1)
* informational social influence/internalisation – more is now known about the harmful effects of single-use plastic items on the environment/climate change, people may have become convinced by
such evidence. (1)
(1) Obedience processes:
* rules on single-use plastic items have changed, eg charges for plastic shopping bags, etc. (1)

28
Q

In a sixth form debating society, Samina is the only student in a group of six who does not
believe that drugs should be legalised.
Using your knowledge of minority influence processes, explain two ways in which Samina
could convince the other students in the debating society to agree with her. (4 marks)

A
  • Samina could demonstrate consistency by not deviating from her view that drugs should not be legalised – she could point out that this is a view she has held for many years (1)
  • Samina could demonstrate commitment by defending her view that drugs should not be legalised through some personal investment – for instance, offering to speak in assembly about the dangers of
    drugs. This will draw more attention to her case (augmentation principle) (1)
  • Samina should demonstrate flexibility by adapting her view/accepting other valid counterarguments.
    Perhaps some ‘softer’ drugs could be decriminalised, rather than legalised (1)
  • Over time, the rest of the debating society may become ‘converted’ (snowball effect) – for example, if Samina makes her case particularly well (1)
29
Q

Outline social support as resistance to social influence (2 marks)

A

Defiance more likely if others are seen to resist influence (1) seeing others disobey gives observer confidence to do so. (1)

30
Q

A teacher asked her class for a volunteer to talk to future A-level students. The
teacher asked Sarah first, but she refused. The teacher then asked Emily to help.
Use your knowledge of resistance to social influence to explain Emily’s likely response
to the teacher’s request. (3 marks)

A

Social Support Possible content:
* Emily resists the teacher because she is influenced by Sarah’s refusal (1)
* Sarah acts as social support/presence of a role model which makes Emily feel confident to also refuse (1)
Locus of control Possible content:
* Emily resists Sarah’s influence because of her own internal locus of control (1)
* Emily’s internal LOC makes Emily feel confident in making her own decisions, ignoring Sarah’s behaviour. (1)

31
Q

Maya wants to encourage the workers in her office to use their own reusable cups at box
work, rather than the disposable paper cups provided by the company.
Explain how Maya might show either commitment or flexibility to persuade the
workers to change their behaviour. (2 marks)

A

Commitment: Maya might place herself at some inconvenience (1) – she may volunteer to buy some
reusable cups. (2) This will draw more attention to her ‘cause’ (augmentation principle)