1. Second Language Aquisition Flashcards
Input hypothesis
“comprehensible input” containing past-tense forms whileher “affective filter is kept low”
natural order hypothesis
learning-acquisition hypothesis ( subconsciously)-> natural communication
Interaction hypothesis 과정
어떤방법으로 input을 comprehensible하게 만들 것인가
“modified interaction” makes input comprehensible.
그래서, two-way task가 중요 Incomprehensible input (high marks) ->communication breakdown (high marks?) -> meaning negotiation-> T's interactional modification( good grades, A's and B 's)-> comprehensible input
Interactional structure is modified for the input to be comprehensible
Negotiation of meaning기출 선지
- 의미협상을 통해 L2 학습자들은 comprehensible input을 갖는다
- 의미협상은 제2언어학습자들의 이해를 촉진시킨다
- 의미협상을통해 학습자들은 자신의 언어사용에 대한 피드백을 받는다.
- 의미협상은 L2 학습자들이 그들의 output을 수정하고 조절하도록 촉발시킨다.
- Meaning negotiation helps L2 learners to obtain comprehensible input
- Meaning negotiation facilitates L2 learners’ comprehension
- Meaning negotiation provides learners with feedback on their own use of L2.( output 측면)
- Meaning negotiation prompts L2 learners to adjust and modify their output. ( output 측면)
Output hypothesis 기출선지
- 학생은 pushed output을 할 수 있는 기회를 받는다
- 학생은 교사의 피드백 이후에 스스로 에러를고쳐
- output hypothesis의 관점에서 보면 학생의 아웃풋이 그녀의 과거시제 규칙의 습득을 보여준다
- The S is provided with an opportunity for “pushed output”
- The S make “self-repair” following the T’s feedback.
- From the perspective of output hypothesis, the S’s output reflects her acquisition of past-tense rules through pushed output.
학생이 교사의 피드백을 uptake 하지 못 했을 때 (기출)
교사는 학생의 잠재적 발달 수준을 뛰어 넘는 도움을 제공한다.
The T offers assistance beyond “the S’s zone of proximal development.
Clarification request
Clarification request indicates ( to Ss) either “that their utterance has been misunderstood by T” or “that the utterance is ill-formed in some way that a repetition or a reformulation is required.”
e.g.) pardon? I’m confused. Lost whose book?
positive evidence
positive evidence: well-formed sentences to which learners are exposed.
negative evidence
information that is provided to Ss concerning the incorrectness of an utterance.
Output hypothesis 과정
Ss’ erroneous utterance -> T’s “negative” feedback ( pusing의 과정) -> Ss notice the gap in her linguistic kn
- > modify her output ( pushed output/ modified output)
- > She learns s/t new about the lg.
Output의 기능 3가지
- noticing fuction : Ss encounter gaps btw what they want to say and what they are able to say, so they notice what they do not know or know partially in the lg.
- hypothesis-testing fuction : By trying out lg, the S test the hypothesis and receive feedback from an interlocuter.
- Metalinguistic fuction : Ss reflect on the lg they learn and thereby the output enables them to control and internalize linguistic kn
Pushed output
Ss reformulate their utterance as a result of other’s negative feedback
Output that reflects what learners can produce when they are pushed to use the target lg “accurately” and “concisely”
Modified output
modified from the initial utterance
Comprehensible output
lg produced by the learner that can be understood by other speakers
recast
T’s “reformulation” of all or part of a Ss utterance minus the error.
Reformulate an ill-formed utterance in an unobtrusive way.
contain a targetlike alternative to the learner’s ill-formed output. (기출선지)
Lg competence (4)
- grammatical competence: sentence level grammar
- discourse competence : cohesion/ coherence
- the ability to connect sentences into discourse and to form a meaningful whole - illocutionary competence : sending and receiving intended meanings
- socio-linguistic competence
appropriateness of the attitude
choice of style or register
formality
cultural aspects