1 Belief, Decision-making and Behavioral Flashcards
Action bias
The tendency for someone to act when faced with a problem even when inaction would be more effective, or to act when no evident problem exists.
Additive bias
The tendency to solve problems through addition, even when subtraction is a better approach.
Agent detection
The inclination to presume the purposeful intervention of a sentient or intelligent agent.
Ambiguity effect
The tendency to avoid options for which the probability of a favorable outcome is unknown.
Anchoring
The tendency to rely too heavily, or “anchor”, on one trait or piece of information when making decisions (usually the first piece of information acquired on that subject).
Anthropocentric thinking
The tendency to use human analogies as a basis for reasoning about other, less familiar, biological phenomena.
Anthropomorphism
The tendency to characterize animals, objects, and abstract concepts as possessing human-like traits, emotions, and intentions. The opposite bias, of not attributing feelings or thoughts to another person, is dehumanized perception, a type of objectification.
Attentional bias
The tendency of perception to be affected by recurring thoughts.
Attribute substitution
Occurs when a judgment has to be made (of a target attribute) that is computationally complex, and instead a more easily calculated heuristic attribute is substituted. This substitution is thought of as taking place in the automatic intuitive judgment system, rather than the more self-aware reflective system.
Automation bias
The tendency to depend excessively on automated systems which can lead to erroneous automated information overriding correct decisions.
Availability heuristic
The tendency to overestimate the likelihood of events with greater “availability” in memory, which can be influenced by how recent the memories are or how unusual or emotionally charged they may be.
Backfire effect
The reaction to disconfirming evidence by strengthening one’s previous beliefs.
Base rate fallacy
The tendency to ignore general information and focus on information only pertaining to the specific case, even when the general information is more important.
Belief bias
An effect where someone’s evaluation of the logical strength of an argument is biased by the believability of the conclusion.
Berkson’s paradox
The tendency to misinterpret statistical experiments involving conditional probabilities.
Clustering illusion
The tendency to overestimate the importance of small runs, streaks, or clusters in large samples of random data (that is, seeing phantom patterns).
Common source bias
The tendency to combine or compare research studies from the same source, or from sources that use the same methodologies or data.
Compassion fade
The predisposition to behave more compassionately towards a small number of identifiable victims than to a large number of anonymous ones.
Confirmation bias
The tendency to search for, interpret, focus on and remember information in a way that confirms one’s preconceptions.
Congruence bias
The tendency to test hypotheses exclusively through direct testing, instead of testing possible alternative hypotheses.
Conjunction fallacy
The tendency to assume that specific conditions are more probable than a more general version of those same conditions.
Conservatism bias
The tendency to revise one’s belief insufficiently when presented with new evidence.
Continued influence effect
The tendency to believe previously learned misinformation even after it has been corrected. Misinformation can still influence inferences one generates after a correction has occurred.
Contrast effect
The enhancement or reduction of a certain stimulus’ perception when compared with a recently observed, contrasting object.
Curse of knowledge
When better-informed people find it extremely difficult to think about problems from the perspective of lesser-informed people.
Declinism
The predisposition to view the past favorably and future negatively
Decoy effect
Preferences for either option A or B change in favor of option B when option C is presented, which is completely dominated by option B (inferior in all respects) and partially dominated by option A.
Default effect
When given a choice between several options, the tendency to favor the default one.
Denomination effect
The tendency to spend more money when it is denominated in small amounts (e.g., coins) rather than large amounts (e.g., bills).
Disposition effect
The tendency to sell an asset that has accumulated in value and resist selling an asset that has declined in value.
Distinction bias
The tendency to view two options as more dissimilar when evaluating them simultaneously than when evaluating them separately.
Dread aversion
Just as losses yield double the emotional impact of gains, dread yields double the emotional impact of savouring.
Dunning–Kruger effect
The tendency for unskilled individuals to overestimate their own ability and the tendency for experts to underestimate their own ability.
Duration neglect
The neglect of the duration of an episode in determining its value.
Hot-cold empathy gap
The tendency to underestimate the influence of visceral drives on one’s attitudes, preferences, and behaviors.
End-of-history illusion
The age-independent belief that one will change less in the future than one has in the past.
Endowment effect
The tendency for people to demand much more to give up an object than they would be willing to pay to acquire it.
Exaggerated expectation
The tendency to expect or predict more extreme outcomes than those outcomes that actually happen.
Experimenter’s or
expectation bias
The tendency for experimenters to believe, certify, and publish data that agree with their expectations for the outcome of an experiment, and to disbelieve, discard, or downgrade the corresponding weightings for data that appear to conflict with those expectations.
Forer effect or
Barnum effect
The observation that individuals will give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality that supposedly are tailored specifically for them, but are in fact vague and general enough to apply to a wide range of people. This effect can provide a partial explanation for the widespread acceptance of some beliefs and practices, such as astrology, fortune telling, graphology, and some types of personality tests.
Form function attribution bias
In human–robot interaction, the tendency of people to make systematic errors when interacting with a robot. People may base their expectations and perceptions of a robot on its appearance (form) and attribute functions which do not necessarily mirror the true functions of the robot.
Framing effect
Drawing different conclusions from the same information, depending on how that information is presented.
Frequency illusion or
Baader–Meinhof phenomenon
The frequency illusion is that once something has been noticed then every instance of that thing is noticed, leading to the belief it has a high frequency of occurrence (a form of selection bias).[51] The Baader–Meinhof phenomenon is the illusion where something that has recently come to one’s attention suddenly seems to appear with improbable frequency shortly afterwards.
Functional fixedness
Limits a person to using an object only in the way it is traditionally used.
Gambler’s fallacy
The tendency to think that future probabilities are altered by past events, when in reality they are unchanged.
Gender bias
A widely held set of implicit biases that discriminate against a gender.