1:1 Foundations of cognitive psychology: from Plato to Pavlov Flashcards

1
Q

What is the definition of cognition in everyday use and in psychology?

A

Everyday cognition: an individual thought.

Psychology cognition: all forms of mental processes – conscious and unconscious, deliberate and automatic.

Psychology domains of cognition include:
○ perception and memory, 
○ the understanding of language, 
○ how we identify the objects in our world, 
○ how we form and use concepts, 
○ interpret events, 
○ ascribe meaning, 
○ make judgments and decisions,
○  solve problems,
○  plan, and so on-- 
○ essentially, everything that allows us to function within the world.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What branch of study is cognitive psychology devoted to?

A

The scientific study of mental and cognitive processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does cognitive psychology seek to identify and understand?

A

The internal representations and structures that underlie our conscious and unconscious cognitions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cognitive psychology is based on building theoretical descriptions or models of cognitive structures and processes.

Because we cannot observe them directly, the structures and processes can be considered:

A

Hypothetical constructs.

Their existence in nature is inferred from a combination of testable theory and experimental study: this is cognitive psychology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When was cognitive psychology arguably the dominant school of psychology?

A

Later 20th century and 21st century.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

True or false: When we talk about cognitive psychology, we are mainly referring to experimental cognitive psychology.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What areas of study have made cognitive psychologists focus on emerging area of science?

A

Attention, memory, decision making, etc.

The study of brain mechanisms and functional cognitive neuroscience, computers and artificial intelligence, and psycholinguistics.

These different areas, once largely separate, have grown closer and closer– building on each other’s theories, methods, and findings to form evermore integrated models of the mind and how it works.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the integration of many cognitive areas of study called?

When did it start?

A

The cognitive revolution.

Middle of the 20th century, but continues today.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which two ancient philosophers are thoughts to have shaped modern cognitive psychology?

A

Plato and Aristotle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Where does the word “psychology” derive from?

A

The Greek word “psyche,” which refers to the soul as distinct from the physical body.

In the thinking at that time, the soul encompassed a wide range of concepts, including what we would call the mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What two broad schools of thinking emerged 2000+ years ago?

A

Rationalism and empiricism.

They still influence and echo through modern psychological theory today and are seen as complementary, rather than opposing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which school of philosophy was proposed by Plato and what views did it hold?

A

The rationalist schools.

They broadly held that we can explore the mind and other abstract ideas and constructs through a process of thinking itself, by examining personal experience and, through that, mental processes.

Rationalism -->
Thinking itself -->
Knowledge is innate -->
Nature -->
Core human nature
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were two key mental processes examined by rationalists?

A

INTUITION: considered a form of rational insight arising from exploration of an idea.

DEDUCTION: where we use logical processes of reason to draw novel, general conclusions from existing knowledge and experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What processes does rationalists think are innate or acquired through development, without the need to be learned?

A

Rationalist thinking often presumes that much knowledge, including mathematical concepts such as quantity and logic, is innate.

This is a version of the NATURE view in the nature versus nurture dichotomy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What broad generalization did rationalists hold about human nature?

A

We all have an invariable core, our individual human nature, that cannot be altered or manipulated.

It is this that makes each of us unique, whether good or bad.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who was a founder of empiricism?

A

Aristotle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What was the empiricists approach?

A

They believed that the fundamental concepts of the mind and all knowledge comes from sensation and experience, rather than sitting there, waiting to emerge.

Empiricists had a profound preference for simpler explanations.

Human beings can be controlled and manipulated exceptionally easily.

Also, we are shaped by what happens to us, the NURTURE viewpoint.

Empiricism –>
Shaped by experience –>
Nurture –>
Humans can be controlled and manipulated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

In nature vs nurture, which view did empiricists hold and which did rationalists hold?

A

Rationalists: nature

Empiricists: nurture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did later empiricists often have a skeptical distrust of?

A

The unobservable. They preferred evidence of our senses and what emerged from them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What kind of explanations did empiricists prefer?

A

Simpler explanations, ones that were sufficient to account for what could be experienced and observed.

Such simplicity was contrasted with explanations based on the internal and the unobservable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How did the rationalists approach explanations of the internal and unobservable?

A

They tended to be complex, arising from intuition and reason.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

True or false: An implication of the empiricist view was that human beings can be controlled and manipulated exceptionally easily.

A

True.

They believed that we are nothing other than what we experience and so can be influenced to do whatever we’re taught, again, for good or bad.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

True or false: Today, rationalist and empiricist principles remain contradictory or conflicting.

A

False.

They can be applied to different methods of inquiry and subject areas.

The modern scientific method involves the interplay between reasoning and abstract theorizing, from which generalizations arise by deductive processes, and induction, where we use empirical methods, such as observation and experiments, to test the validity of those theories and so refine them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

During the European Age of Enlightenment and the start of the Scientific Revolution, who was one of the most influential figures in modern philosophy and arguably one of the founding influences on modern psychology?

A

Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)

“All our knowledge begins with the senses, proceeds then to understanding and ends with reason.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What issue did Kant address in regards to psychology?

A

Whether psychology, the study of the mind, could ever be an empirical science in the same way as the physical sciences, such as chemistry and physics, which he felt were governed by the immutable laws of mathematics, or whether it must remain within the realm of philosophy or natural science.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What was Kant’s conclusion about psychology?

A

That it was not and could not be an empirical science, that the mind and its functions were not amenable to direct study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What were three main arguments of Kant to show that psychology could not be an empirical science?

A
  1. INTROSPECTION ALONE: We can only rationally study our own thoughts and internal processes and not those of others.
  2. NO GENERAL LAW: One person’s introspection may be very different from another’s and, therefore, a poor method to reveal any underlying laws governing the mind.
  3. REDUCTIONISM: Introspection artificially forces us to separate things that may not be separable, that such so-called reductionism may lead to false conclusions when it comes to studying the mind.
  4. INTROSPECTION ALTERS what we are attempting to observe and understand.

Kant concluded that the scientific study of the mind was doomed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Why do we consider Kant an important figure in the history of cognitive psychology?

A

He defined the mind as a set of separate abilities or functions, but which work together as a whole to produce our experience and onto the level of knowledge and understanding.

He described what we would now call a cognitive architecture, linking elements of perception, cognitive transformation, and knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What was Kant’s transcendental method?

A

Although rejecting the possibility of direct study and measurement, he proposed that, even if we cannot observe the mind, we can infer the conditions that must be present in the mind to explain our conscious experience.

He viewed this as a philosophical rather than a scientific method.

However, in suggesting that there are ways to infer what we cannot directly measure, he established the basic tenet of modern cognitive psychology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Who is credited as the father of experimental psychology?

A

Wilhelm Wundt (1832-1920).

“The distinguishing characteristics of mind are of a subjective sort; we know them only from the contents of consciousness.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Wundt set up one of the first ever:

A

Experimental psychology laboratories in Leipzig, Germany, in 1879.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

True or false: Like Kant, Wundt believed that introspection was the most direct way to study the conscious mind, the only sort that he felt important.

A

True.

But he sought to make it an empirical tool fit for purpose, with his techniques of experimental introspection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What was Kant concerned with in his experimental model?

A

Introspection based on the sensations and the percepts, feelings, or thoughts that arose directly from them, the latter particularly in the form of visual images.

34
Q

Wundt presented stimuli, such as objects, sounds, words, and pictures for a brief but precisely controlled period of time, using electronically controlled apparatus in a dark and quiet room.

What was he trying to measure?

A

The effect the stimuli had on the resultant internal cognitive event.

The goal was to understand how the initial exposure led first to automatic and passive associations – how they had registered or attended to the presence of a stimulus, such as a sound, and its basic properties.

There was then the process of how that led to the conscious thought, when the precise nature of the stimulus was registered.

35
Q

What was Wundt’s process of APPERCEPTION?

A

The formation of a mental image to the stimulus.

This was seen to result from an active, controlled, and voluntary process, and represented the higher function of the mind.

36
Q

What was Wundt’s school of thought sometimes referred to as?

A

Voluntarism.

The separation of automatic and controlled cognitive processes is still important today, although, unlike Wundt, we no longer see the controlled ones as inherently superior.

37
Q

In a typical Wundt experiment, a subject might be shown a word, such as “apple”, and might immediately report an associated property, such as crisp or sweet or red.

This will be reported as preceding conscious awareness of the whole object, the apple itself.

What did Wundt reason from this?

A

Our thoughts have structure.

When the mind was presented with an apple, it received a set of properties that defined its structure before being combined to form the thought or mental image, a principle called STRUCTURALISM.

38
Q

Describe Wundt’s approach called MENTAL CHRONOMETRY.

A

He used electromechanical devices to record reaction times from the presentation of the stimulus to the introspective response.

He sought to separate out the time course for his core processes of attention and apperception.

His trained researchers would react as quickly as they could by pressing a button, either when they had registered the stimulus or when they had formed the image.

He used the SUBTRACTIVE PROCEDURE: The time difference between the two different introspective products, to estimate the extra time needed for apperception to take place, he estimated to be about 1/10 of a second or 100 milliseconds.

39
Q

True or false: Wundt attempted to study what we would now recognize as core aspects of cognition, such as learning and memory, language, or reasoning.

A

False.

This was not because he denied that they existed or felt that they were unimportant, more that they were less accessible to his experimental methods and to introspection.

Thus, Wundt limited his methods and theories only to what could be studied.

40
Q

Wundt was interested in the final, WHOLE, conscious experience.

Unlike Wundt, what was Edward Titchener interested in?

A

Using experimental introspection to reveal and understand the ELEMENTAL PARTS of conscious experience, by breaking them down.

His teacher, Wundt, strongly and vocally disagreed with his approach.

41
Q

Titchener took the basic principle of Wundt to extremes and extended it greatly.

What kind of approach to psychology is this?

A

Structuralist.

Titchener sought to standardize the experimental method of introspection to improve its accuracy and reproducibility.

42
Q

True or false: Titchener was interested in holistic processes involved in properties of the mind, such as the will.

A

False.

Titchener’s psychology and the methods used was very much focused on the immediate and mental experience, the sensation, rather than what use was made of that sensation or the function it served.

How the brain answers the question, what is it? Rather than, what is it for?

43
Q

Titchener believed that cognitions arose from sensations. And so we need a science of sensation as the essential foundation to understand the mind.

He proposed that every sensation, whether sound or smell, was made up of what four independent properties?

A
  1. Intensity
  2. Quality
  3. Duration
  4. Spatial extent

For example, a presented image could be:

  1. bright, its intensity;
  2. pale red, its quality;
  3. brief, its duration; and
  4. small, its extent.

These properties could then each be sub-classified further.

44
Q

What would be the aim of the structuralist, presented with an apple?

A

The aim was to identify the key sensory features that defined apple-ness and so permitted the identification of the apple as an object.

That same set of features would also permit discrimination between one fruit and another or between an apple and a ball.

Whether or not an apple is simply defined as the sum of its sensory parts is debatable. However, FEATURE ANALYSIS, as a means of object identification, remains in more contemporary cognitive theories.

45
Q

What limited the structuralist approach as a primary model of psychology?

A

Its focus on sensation.

It neglected whole areas of cognitive science – memory, perception, decision making, and so on, let alone areas such as consciousness and the will.

46
Q

What American was an important influence on introspection and experimental methods to study the structure of the mind?

A

William James.

William James brought together a disparate body of work in his seminal, two volume work, Principles of Psychology, published in 1890, taking him 12 years to write.

He authored the first ever university course in psychology in the US at Harvard University.

47
Q

What did James’ writings include, widening the range of psychological functions?

A

Consciousness, instinct and emotion.

48
Q

What approach did James adopt?

A

Functional Introspection.

Informed by Darwin’s evolutionary theory, he attempted to explain how the mind adapts to meet the needs of the organism.

He was interested in mental processes, rather than mental structures.

For example, what was the purpose of consciousness or the will, rather than trying to dissect and define its constituent parts.

49
Q

A STRUCTURALIST who wants to understand how a car worked would stop it, break it down into its parts, and attempt to work backwards from that knowledge.

A FUNCTIONALIST would:

A

Drive the car and you use that experience to understand how its constituent parts worked together and allowed it to move, start, stop, and turn.

50
Q

What approaches have since replaced James’ methods?

A

Modern experimental approaches.

However, functionalism remains a core part of modern psychology, with its focus on cognitive processes and how would they serve adaptive behavior.

Functionalism has merged with other aspects of the structuralist tradition to form an overarching framework to make up cognitive psychology.

51
Q

Who is a key pioneer of what we would now recognize as experimental cognitive psychology?

A

German psychologist Hermann Ebbinghaus.

52
Q

Ebbinghaus accepted the inevitability of MEASUREMENT ERRORS impacting the ability to accurately test processes.

What did he emphasize a need for in response to that?

A

STATISTICAL APPROACHES to estimate the effects that were of interest from the average of the repeated measurements, while at the same time, obtaining estimates of the measurement error.

53
Q

What is the Ebbinghaus forgetting curve?

A

A measurement of the time course over which we seem to forget information.

54
Q

Ebbinghaus used a standard set of nonsense syllables, such as “buh” and “pluh” and “kik,” to measure:

A

How much was retained in his memory after a delay that he varied from minutes to several days.

Once the set could be repeated back 100% accurately, that level of performance was known as the CRITERION.

55
Q

The difference between the original and the late learning was known as:

A

The SAVINGS SCORE.

The better retention, that is, the less the forgetting, the fewer repetitions he would need to relearn, and so the larger the savings score.

When averaged over many individual trials with different delays or attention intervals, the result was the classic Ebbinghaus forgetting curve.

56
Q

What did the Ebbinghaus curve find?

A

Most forgetting happens very quickly in the first minutes and hours.

But then, forgetting slows down such that there is very little further forgetting of material after four days, even when intervals of a month were measured.

57
Q

What fundamental insights came from Ebbinghaus?

A

Fundamental insights into the processes of memory that were inaccessible to the method of introspection and paved the way for experimental cognitive psychology of memory.

58
Q

What is the title given to the following quote:

“In no case is an animal activity to be interpreted in terms of higher psychological processes if it can be fairly interpreted in terms of processes which stand lower in the scale of psychological evolution and development.”

A

Morgan’s Canon.

C Lloyd Morgan (1852-1936).

This set an important constraint on our theories of animal behavior.

For animals, we need the simplest possible explanation that explains what can be observed without invoking higher, that is, human, psychological processes.

– Consistent with the general scientific principle of PARSIMONY or Occam’s razor.

59
Q

Until the late 19th to early 20th century, all psychology was effectively cognitive psychology, an attempt to understand the processes and structures that constituted the mind and that permitted the mind to control a range of adaptive functions.

Which approach developed as a reaction against introspection?

A

Behaviorism.

60
Q

What were four main criticisms of introspection?

A
  1. It could be UNRELIABLE, in that one person’s introspection might be very different from another’s, or even their own introspection on a different occasion.
  2. It was UNREPRESENTATIVE. Those doing the introspection were highly trained and therefore their experiences may not be representative of people in general.
  3. It was LIMITED IN ITS USE.
    It could not be used with children or those with low intellectual ability or limited language skills.
  4. It was LIMITED IN THE AREAS OF PSYCHOLOGY TO WHICH IT COULD BE APPLIED. It could not be used to examine structures and processes that were unconscious; that were very quick; or to languages.
61
Q

Who said: The time seems to have come when psychology must discard all reference to consciousness; when it need no longer delude itself into thinking that it is making mental states the object of observation.”

A

John B. Watson (1878-1958).

He founded the behaviorism school of psychological theory and practice.

The quote came from a lecture given by him at Columbia University in New York in 1913 called “Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It”, which can be considered the behaviorist manifesto.

He thought the study of mental states was fundamentally unscientific and should be abandoned. He called these cognitive states “private events.”

He rejected structuralists, functionalists, and the method of introspection. He denied the need to invoke faculties such as consciousness, volition, imagery, and perception.

62
Q

What was a fundamental unit in behaviorism?

A

Association.

How the animal or human establish links between two stimuli, or between a stimulus and a response, or between a response and an outcome or adaptive behavioral goal, in other words – learning.

The study of basic associative processes is also central to the neural scientific study of learning and the mechanisms by which neurons alter their patterns of firing based on the relationship between a stimulus and its outcome, such as reward.

63
Q

The birth of behaviorism was the start of what we now call:

A

Learning theory.

64
Q

True or false: Watson and other behaviorists proposed that things that we consider as essentially cognitive, such as human language, reasoning, and problem solving, be pushed to the margins of psychological study.

A

True.

However, he did not deny their existence.

He called them private events, only to say that they must be explainable by simpler, observable processes, or public events.

65
Q

Describe behaviorism.

A

It’s an approach to psychology which limits itself to the description of relationships between observable environmental events and ensuing observable behavior of organisms in the environment.

Behaviorism rejects subjective experience as a proper topic of study and resists explanations of observable acts in terms of inferred but unobservable mental processes.

66
Q

Watson said to avoid psychological explanations that go beyond INPUTS and OUTPUTS.

Describe the three links in a behaviorists’ controlled experiment.

1st link –>
2nd link (black box) –>
3rd link

A

First link: STIMULUS = Input (Antecedent)

Second link: Intervening variables = black box = the inner state / private events. – Just a link between input and output; don’t need to know what functions they solve.
– Morgan’s Canon: resist using the unobserved in explanations.

Third link: RESPONSE = Output or Behavior.

67
Q

Who studied physiological reflexes?

A

Ivan Pavlov (1849-1936)

Such reflexes are preserved in animals and humans with major damage to the central nervous system.

68
Q

What did Pavlov pair during his experiments?

A

Natural stimulus and neutral stimulus.

Natural stimulus = food.
Neutral stimulus = bell.

It’s a form of Stimulus-Stimulus, or SS associative learning.

69
Q

What kind of response does unconditioned stimulus (US) lead to?

A

Unconditioned Response (UR)

US –> UR

Eg. Food –> saliva

70
Q

What is the bell considered while being paired with the US in the beginning learning phase of conditioning?

A

Neutral.

Learning phase:
Bell + US –> UR

71
Q

After several repeated pairings, the bell provokes salivation and is now considered a ____ and the saliva is considered a _____.

A

Bell = Conditioned Stimulus (CS)

Saliva = Conditioned Response

After learned:
CS –> CR

Pavlov called the salivation in response to the bell alone a “PSYCHIC SECRETION.”

Once the bell has acquired the ability to elicit salivation, the bell can be paired with another neutral stimulus, such as a light, until it too becomes a conditioned stimulus, a so-called SECONDARY CONDITIONING.

72
Q

What study did classical conditioning become a crucial method for?

A

The mechanisms of ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING, including how learning developed over time or declined.

73
Q

What does the phenomenon of extinction describe?

A

When a conditioned response (CR) stops.

Eg: If the bell no longer serves as a signal for the imminent arrival of food, the CR eventually stops. Once again, the bell becomes a neutral stimulus.

74
Q

What is spontaneous recovery?

A

The re-activation or re-emergence of a dormant learned association, rather than new learning.

The CR returns quickly after exposure to the CS.

Eg: If the dog is exposed to the bell, a few hours after extinction, the animal may show a reemergence of the salivation response, although this will be short lived.

75
Q

Describe the generalization gradient.

A

Animals conditioned to produce a CR to a specific CS will produce the same CR to a similar CS.

The strength of the CR will be related to how similar the new CS is to the original.

Eg. Tuning fork at a specific frequency.

76
Q

How does the sea slug demonstrate that classical conditioning does not require cognitive explanations?

A

It has a very simple CNS, yet can still learn S-S pairings through classical conditioning.

Experiments showed the growing strength of the neutral stimulus was able to evoke a response, as it became a conditioned stimulus.

The investigators found that the removal of one particular group of neurons abolishes the ability to learn through classical conditioning.

77
Q

What did the experiments with Little Albert and the white rat show?

A

Conditioned fear.

The origins of neurosis.

78
Q

In controlled experiments, when the 1st link or stimulus is a natural, less-controlled situation, event, or circumstance that precedes and influences a subsequent output, it is called an:

A

Antecedent.

79
Q

When an antecedent influences an output requires:

A

Functional analysis.

80
Q

In a simple experiment, for example when a simple lever is used, the 3rd link or output is called a RESPONSE.

When an output in an experiment is complex and functional analysis is required, what term is typically used for the 3rd link / output?

A

Behavior.

81
Q

True or false: Through the process of classical conditioning, Pavlov intended for the dog to become aware that the bell signals the imminent arrival of food.

A

False.

The simple ability of a stimulus to produce a response, however complex, does not necessarily imply that there is a cognitive mediational process, or conscious knowing.

Recall Morgan’s Canon: We should avoid invoking cognitions if there are simpler explanations.

A change in the strength of the CR to a similar CS indicates that the animal has discriminated between the original and the new CS, but does not necessarily imply that discrimination was a conscious one.

82
Q

Kandel’s work forged links between psychology and brain science. He studied the nervous system in Aplysia (sea slugs) and found that the removal of one particular group of neurons abolished:

A

The ability to learn through classical conditioning.

Eric Kandel won the Nobel Prize for physiology in medicine in 2000 for his work on the physiological basis of memory, much of it using Aplysia.