06: CONTROLLING Flashcards

1
Q

It means to exercise restraining or directing influence over someone or something (to regulate); to have power over (to rule); or to reduce the incidence or severity of (to moderate).

A

CONTROL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

It is an important function that allows a person to adjust the operations of the organization to its predetermined outcomes.

A

CONTROL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

It helps check errors and take corrective actions so that deviations from the standards are minimized and the stated goals of the organization are achieved in a desired manner.

A

CONTROL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Merely detect errors in the organization; act of foreseeing

A

CONTROL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Checking current performance against predetermined standards contained in the plants with a view to ensure adequate progress and satisfactory performance.

A

CONTROL by EDUARD FRANZ LEOPOLD BRECH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The measurement and correction of performance in order to make sure that enterprise objectives and the plans devised to attain them are accomplished.

A

CONTROLLING by HAROLD KOONTZ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Also known as Performance review, Performance evaluation, and Employee appraisal.

A

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

It is a method of control that documents and evaluates the job performance of an employee.

A

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

It is a part of career development and consist of regular reviews of employee performance within the organization.

A

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Systematic and periodic process assess an employee’s productivity in relation to set criteria and organizational objectives.

A

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Improves not only the quality of work but holds important implications for employee motivation and discontent.

A

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

It identifies the employee’s strengths and weaknesses and provides the employer on the employee’s capacity for retention and promotion.

A

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The appraisal also guides the training needed to improve performance.

A

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Varies depending on the type of job and the needs of the pharmacy.

A

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

COMMON FACTORS THAT CAN BE EVALUATED IN AN APPRAISAL:
- Can measure the employee output on an hourly, daily, weekly, or monthly basis.

A

UNIT OF OUTPUT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

COMMON FACTORS THAT CAN BE EVALUATED IN AN APPRAISAL:
- Medical representatives may be measured through their sales per week; Pharmacists may be measured by the number of prescriptions dispensed per day.

A

UNITS OF OUTPUT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

COMMON FACTORS THAT CAN BE EVALUATED IN AN APPRAISAL:
- Refers to the frequency of prescription errors, incorrect transactions, complaints, and other clerical mistakes that compromise the operations of the pharmacy.

A

QUALITY OF WORK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

COMMON FACTORS THAT CAN BE EVALUATED IN AN APPRAISAL:
- An unquantifiable factor that is difficult to measure. The closest approximation could be the quality of work, punctuality, and the degree to which an employee can be relied on to do tasks.

A

DEPENDABILITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

COMMON FACTORS THAT CAN BE EVALUATED IN AN APPRAISAL:
- Includes employee’s knowledge of the job, pharmacy, and parent company policies, among others. This can be assessed through quarterly or yearly objective testing or informal interviews.

A

JOB KNOWLEDGE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

COMMON FACTORS THAT CAN BE EVALUATED IN AN APPRAISAL:
- The employees’ willingness to work as a team is essential given that most pharmacies rely on a few people. Another unquantifiable factor but can be assessed through observing employee dynamics and monitoring conflicts at work.

A

ABILITY AND WILLINGNESS TO WORK WITH OTHERS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

COMMON FACTORS THAT CAN BE EVALUATED IN AN APPRAISAL:
- The degree to which employees can work on their own and perform relatively unstructured tasks. These factors are difficult to measure, but can be determined through observation, monitoring, and psychological testing.

A

INITIATIVE AND ABILITY TO HANDLE AMBIGUITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

It is not complete until the appraisal has been personally discussed with the employee.

A

EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL PROCESS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

APPRAISAL PROCESS
- Refers to the identification of measures that would distinguish between successful and unsuccessful performance.

A

ESTABLISHING STANDARDS AND MEASURES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

APPRAISAL PROCESS
- Employees should communicate to employees the guidelines and protocols that will be used in the appraisal process. Standards and expectations should be clarified, and a feeling of involvement must be established.

A

COMMUNICATING JOB EXPECTATIONS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

APPRAISAL PROCESS
- This stages specifies the required resources of the organization to attain the set goals.

A

PLANNING

26
Q

APPRAISAL PROCESS
- A key part of the performance appraisal process.

A

MONITORING

27
Q

APPRAISAL PROCESS
- Done by observing the employee’s work, this stage should be able to provide assistance when needed and remove obstacles instead of interfering.

A

MONITORING PERFORMANCE

28
Q

APPRAISAL PROCESS
- It involves documenting performance through observation, recall, evaluation, written communications, and analysis of data.

A

APPRAISING

29
Q

APPRAISAL PROCESS
- It involves verbal communication, listening, problem-solving, negotiating, compromising, conflict resolution, and reaching a consensus. The appraisal should be reviewed in a meeting between the employer and the employee. Analysis and discussion should be encouraged during the meeting.

A

GIVING FEEDBACK

30
Q

APPRAISAL PROCESS
- Basing on the appraisal and feedback results, various decisions can be made about giving rewards and sanctions.

A

DECISION-MAKING

31
Q

APPRAISAL PROCESS
- This stage provides opportunities for the development of skills and professional knowledge of employees.

A

DEVELOPING PERFORMANCE

32
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
- The manager discusses with the employee the latter’s performance during the previous performance period.

A

TRADITIONAL APPRAISAL

33
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
- The discussion is based on the manager’s observations and evaluation of the employee’s performance

A

TRADITIONAL APPRAISAL

34
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
- Also known as feedback on manager performance, this approach involves the process of delivering feedback from subordinates to superiors.

A

UPWARD FEEDBACK

35
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
- This is intended to identify ways to increase management effectiveness.

A

UPWARD FEEDBACK

36
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
- It creates a two-way communication between employees and managers that can assist in developing leadership skills.

A

UPWARD FEEDBACK

37
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
- Also known as multi-rater feedback, this approach gives the employees the opportunity to assess the manager and vice-versa

A

360 DEGREES FEEDBACK

38
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
- The feedback for employees would come from self-assessment and external sources such as customers and immediate supervisors. On the other hand, the feedback for the manager would come from employees under his or her direct supervision.

A

360 DEGREES FEEDBACK

39
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
- The results are often used by the person receiving the feedback to plan for the employees’ training and development.

A

360 DEGREES FEEDBACK

40
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
- Most accurate ratings come from raters that have known the employees for one to five years.

A

360 DEGREES FEEDBACK

41
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
-Employees evaluate their own performance which is usually done one or two weeks before their performance review

A

SELF-APPRAISAL APPROACH

42
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
- This gives the employees a chance to compare their impression of their performance with that of the employer’s evaluation.

A

SELF-APPRAISAL APPROACH

43
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
- Self-appraisal is important to an employee’s personal and professional advancement.

A

SELF-APPRAISAL APPROACH

44
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
- The employee evaluates an employee based on observable dimensions of personality.

A

TRAIT APPROACH

45
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
- Examples of dimensions of personality are integrity, honesty, punctuality, and dependability.

A

TRAIT APPROACH

46
Q

APPROACHES TO THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
- This approach based the appraisal on work achievements judged against goals set mutually by the supervisor and subordinate.

A

RESULTS APPROACH

47
Q

METHODS IN CONDUCTING APPRAISALS:
- It provides a brief essay detailing his or her assessment of the strengths, weaknesses, and potentials of the employee.

A

ESSAY APPRAISAL

48
Q

METHODS IN CONDUCTING APPRAISALS:
- It is ranked and compared to one another in terms of their work performance.

A

RANKING METHOD

49
Q

METHODS IN CONDUCTING APPRAISALS:
- It describes incidents, giving details on both positive and negative behaviors of the employee.

A

CRITICAL INCIDENT APPRAISAL

50
Q

METHODS IN CONDUCTING APPRAISALS:
- A technique the employees are allowed to set their own realistic performance goals. This eliminates the feeling of employees being judged unfairly by using high standards.

A

MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES (MBO)

51
Q

METHODS IN CONDUCTING APPRAISALS:
- This assessment makes use of a graphic rating scale to measure an employee’s quality of work (unsatisfactory, average, above average, outstanding).

A

GRAPHIC RATING SCALE

52
Q

An aid to measuring, with a reasonable degree of accuracy and uniformity, the abilities and skills of an employee in his or her present job. It helps appraise present performance in comparison with previous performance in the same job.

A

RATING SCALE

53
Q

ADVANTAGES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
- Can easily provide feedback on the positive abilities of the employee.

A

ESSAY APPRAISAL

54
Q

ADVANTAGES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
- Can create a high-performance work culture.

A

RANKING

55
Q

ADVANTAGES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
- Provides specific examples.

A

CRITICAL INCIDENT APPRAISAL

56
Q

ADVANTAGES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
- Open communication
- Employee may have more “buy-in”

A

MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES

57
Q

ADVANTAGES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
- Inexpensive to develop
- Easily understood by employees and managers

A

GRAPHIC RATING SCALE

58
Q

DISADVANTAGES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
- Subjectivity
- Writing ability of reviewer impacts validity
- Time-consuming (if not combined with other methods)

A

EASY APPRAISAL

59
Q

DISADVANTAGES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
- Possible bias
- Validity depends on the amount of interaction between employees and manager
- Can negatively affect teamwork

A

RANKING

60
Q

DISADVANTAGES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
- Tendency to report negative incidents
- Time consuming for manager

A

CRITICAL INCIDENT APPRAISAL

61
Q

DISADVANTAGES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
- Many only work for some types of job titles

A

MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES

62
Q

DISADVANTAGES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
- Subjectivity
- Can be difficult to use in making compensation and promotion decisions.

A

GRAPHIC RATING SCALE