Year 13 Philosophy Flashcards
1
Q
Critiques of Religion: Freud Strengths (Psychological, “Father Figure”) [P1]
A
- Explains psychologically why people drawn to religion
- Presents people creating comforting beliefs to escape harsh reality is plausible
- Challenges authority/truth claims = analytical
2
Q
Critiques of Religion: Freud Weaknesses [P2]
A
- Disregards social, cultural, historical factors contributing
- Focuses too much on psychology as evidence
- Religion can provide positive impacts
- Oedipus complex discredited by modern psychologists
3
Q
Critiques of Religion: Dawkins Strengths (multiple people suffering a “delusion”) [P3]
A
- Rational ~ focusing on empirical evidence
- Clear answer to Problem of Evil
- Highlights how certain religious beliefs/practices are harmful
- Presents how ethical behaviour can also be based on human welfare
4
Q
Critiques of Religion: Dawkins Weaknesses [P4]
A
- Comparison with religion and mental viruses does not link well
- Overgeneralisation (religions treated in same way)
- Brutal = “delusion” disregards reasoning to religion
- Focuses too much on negative aspects
5
Q
Life After Death: Hick’s Replica Theory Strengths (body can be resurrected) [P1]
A
- Respects religious diversity + compatible with all
- Good explanation for how personal identity can be preserved (links with Christianity)
- Plausible non-materialist explanation regarding debate about identity and existence
6
Q
Life After Death: Hick’s Replica Theory Weaknesses [P2]
A
- Underdeveloped (written in Hick’s last years before death)
- Difficult to prove empirically (cannot communicate with replica)
- People do not want to be exactly replicated (disabilities)
- Raises questions about true nature of identity
7
Q
Life After Death: Near-Death Experiences Strengths [P3]
A
- ‘Out-of-body’ = how body and soul are separate
- People give accounts of observations
- Experiencers report significant positive changes (reduced fear of death + spiritual awareness)
8
Q
Life After Death: Near-Death Experiences Weaknesses [P4]
A
- Evidence from REs from hallucinations and deception (Singer + Ramachandran)
- People lie about accounts
- No empirical evidence for ‘afterlife’
- Each experience is subjective = no one direct ‘truth’