WS 5: Free Movement of Persons Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Article 45(1) TFEU

A

Free movement of workers shall be secured within the Union

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Article 45(2) TFEU

A

Migrant workers must not suffer discrimination based on nationality as regards their employment, remuneration and other conditions of work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Are these articles directly effective?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Lawrie Blum [1986]

A
  1. A ‘worker’ is a person who (Lawrie Blum [1986] definition)
    a. Performs services for another person;
    b. Under the control of that other person; and
    c. Receives remuneration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ex p Antonissen [1991]

A

A workseeker is also a worker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Art 6(1) of D. 2004/38

A

all union citizens have right of residence for up to 3 months in another member state. There is no need for them to be carrying on an economic or any other activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Art 14(4)(b) 2004/38

A

as long as union citizen can provide evidence he’s looking for work and have a genuine chance of getting work, they may not be expelled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Levin v Straatssecretaris van Justitie

A
  1. Part time workers are workers provided that (Levin v Straatssecretaris van Justitie):
    a. Work is effective and genuine; and
    b. Not on such a small scale as to be regarded as purely marginal and ancillary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Kempf [1986]

A

A German national, was a part-time music teacher. Supplemented income with state benefits. – a part-time worker is still a worker, even if he supplements income by other lawful means, including public benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Steymann

A

a. Unpaid worker for religious community, if Steymann:
i. Contributes towards community’s economic activities
ii. Receives benefits for this contribution, as a form of indirect wage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Bettray

A

b. A drug addict in rehab is NOT a worker – cos work undertaken to benefit him, he is not carrying out economic activity (Bettray)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How is nationality decided?

A

Nationality is decided by the MS of which nationality is claimed (Micheletti [1992] + Declaration on Nationality attached to the Treaty on European Union says same thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Saunders [1979]

A

e. Article 45 TFEU does not apply to totally internal situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Van Duyn

A

confirmed that Art 45 had direct effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Primary source of right of residence?

A

Art 45(3) TFEU: rights to ‘move freely within the territory of Member States” and right to “stay” in host state while working and “remain” thereafter subject to conditions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who does 2004/38 cover?

A

Union Citizens (Art 3(1)(a)) and their family members (Art 3(1)(b))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Art 4

A

a. Art 4: Right of exit

Document: For Union citizens: ID card or passport; for family members who are non Union citizens: passport

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Art 5

A

Right of entry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Documents required for right of entry?

A

Document: For Union citizens: ID Card or passport; for family members who are non EU: passport and possibly a visa required by MS they are entering. However, host state must give every facility to obtain such a visa, free of charge, issued quickly as possible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Art 6

A

Right of residence up to 3 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Art 6(1)

A

RofResidence up to 3 months and Don’t have to be pursuing economic or any other activity activity (Art 6(1))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Art 6(2))

A

extends this right to non-Union national family member ‘accompanying or joining’ the migrant Union citizen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Documentation for right of residence for up to 3 months

A

Document: Both Union citizens and family members of other nationalities are required to hold a valid ID card or passport during their stay.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Art 7 and who it applies to

A

Right of residence for Union citizens longer than 3 months. Applies to:

i. Workers and self-employed
ii. Sufficient resources to support themselves and sickness insurance
iii. Students who declare they have sufficient resources to support themselves during their course and who have sickness insurance (inc school children)
iv. Family members of the above whatever their own nationality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Documentation required for residence of longer than 3 months

A

Document: Art 8: Registration with authorities of host state may be required, resulting in the issue of a registration certificate. Article 8(3)-(5) lists the documents which may be required upon registration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Articles 16

A

Permanent residence after 5 years continuous legal residence by Union citizen. 16(2) says it applies to family members who are not nationals of a Member State if they have resided with the Union citizen for that time. 16(4): the right can only be lost through 2 consecutive years absence from host state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Article 19

A

Union citizens should apply to host state for a document certifying permanent residence

28
Q

Article 20

A

Any family members who are not Union citizens should apply for a permanent residence card

29
Q

Art 17-18

A

Permanent residence Prior to 5 years if incapacitated to work

30
Q

Procureur du Roi v Royer [1976]

A

The right of residence is not conferred by any of the documents mentioned. This is conferred by the Treaty and secondary legislation. Documents are merely evidence that an individual does actually have that right

31
Q

Art 5(3) & 9(3)

A

non-compliance with administrative formalities may make the person concerned liable to proportionate and non-discriminatory sanctions

32
Q

Article 2(2) 2004/38 Definition of family member?

A

a) Spouse
b) Registered partner (if the host member state sees this as equivalent to marriage)
c) Direct descendants who are under 21 or are dependents, and those of the spouse
d) Direct ascendants who are dependents those of the spouse

33
Q

Article 3(2): Other individuals that have entry/residence rights

A

a. Other family members = dependents or members of the household of the UC or where serious health grounds strictly require the personal care of the family member
b. Durable relationship - duly attested

34
Q

Provision for right of family member to stay for longer than 3 months

A

Article 7(1)(d) 2004/38

35
Q

Death or departure of UC: Article 12(1)

A

death/departure doesn’t affect the rights of the UCFMs

36
Q

Article 12(2) 2004/38

A

Departure or death doesnt affect the rights of Non-UCFMs so long as they have resided in the host-MS for one year.

37
Q

Article 12(3) Death or departure

A

Departure or death of UC will not affect the right of residence of children/parent who has custody irrespective of the nationality (if the kids are at school long term there)

38
Q

Sandhu [1985] House of Lords

A

An english case so merely persuasive authority in other jurisdictions. Indian man marries a German woman and they live in the UK. Marriage breaks down, wife returns to Germany

House of Lords: He had lost his right of residence once worker returned to Germany. 12(3) 2004/38. says can stay where they are custodians of kids in full time education. Silent about postiion where no kids

39
Q

Article 13(1) 2004/38

A

Divorce or anullment doesnt affect the rights of UCFMs

40
Q

A 13(2) 2004/38

A

Non-UCFMs not affected by divorce or annullment if:

a) Prior to divorce, together for 3 years, and one of these spent in host MS
b) Partner has custody of UCs kids
c) Difficult circumstances (e.g. domestic violence)
d) Partner has a right of access to minor child in the host state for as long as required. (still subject to article 12(2)

41
Q

Diatta [1985]

A

Senagalese woman married to french man. She went to live with him in germany. later she left him and moved into separate accomodation with intention of divorce. German authorities argued she was no longer true spouse as no longer lived in Germany.

ECJ - Mrs Diatta was still a workers spouse and no need for her to live with him.

42
Q

Surinder Singh 1992

A

ECJ - returning migrant workers can bring non-union spouses home with them. If they weren’t this would deter workers from leaving their home MSs

43
Q

Define expulsion and deportation

A
expulsion = refusing someone entry 
deportation = termination rights of residence and forcing someone to leave
44
Q

Article 45(3) TFEU

A

public policy public sec public health

45
Q

Article 27(1) 2004/38

A

expulsion and deportation cannot be used for purely economic purposes

46
Q

A 27(2) 2004/38

A

expulsion or deportation Must be proportionate. Also, must be based exlusively on the personal conduct of the individual. Must not be carried out on the grounds of previous criminal convictions in themselves. must be a current threat to ph ps pp.

47
Q

Van Duyn [1974]

A

UK government refused Dutch national leave to enter UK to work for Church of Scientology as they considered the group’s activities to be harmful.

ECJ - Current association with a group/body can constitute personal conduct under s.27(2) directive. The activities of the group do not necessarily have to be illegal for MS to expel/deport - it is enough that it is socially harmful.

48
Q

R v Bouchereau 1977

A

French national working in UK convicted for 2nd time in 6 months of drug possession. UK want to deport.

ECJ - said past convictions only relevant inso far as a person shows a propensity to reoffend - past offences may sometimes be sufficient.

49
Q

Adoui and Cornvaille v Belgium 1982

A

Belgium refused residence to 2 French nationals working as prostitutes. Belgian law did not prohibit prostitution only incidental activities.

HELD - where a member state has no domestic legislation against the activity, they cannot refuse residence to non-nationals on that basis.

50
Q

R v Carpenter [2002]

A

Filipino national had overstayed her tourist visa married to Mr Carpenter, a British national who ran a business selling advertising space in journals. Breach of Art. 8 - Deport Mrs Carpenter was a disproportionate interference.

51
Q

Commission v France

A

french required french merchant ships to employe a ration of 3 french crew to non french

52
Q

Art 1(2) reg 492/2011

A

the right to take up employment with same priority as nationals of the host member state.

53
Q

Arti 3(1) 492/2011

A

Allows conditions relating to linguistic knowledge requried by reasona fo the nature of the post to be filled e.g. UK salesman must be able to speak English. Justifiable restriction. (Groener v Minister for Education)

54
Q

A 6(1) 492/2011

A

Engagement and recruitment must not be subject to discriminatory tests or other criteria

55
Q

A 7(1) 492/2011

A

No discrimination on the grounds of nationality in relation to ANY condition of employment

56
Q

A 7(3) 492/2011

A

Training. Foreign nationals should be given access to training on the same terms as home nationals.

57
Q

Art 7(2) 492/2011

A

same social and tax advantages (e.g. perks, tax rates etc.) Cristina v SNCF [1975]

58
Q

Adoui and Cornvaille v Belgium 1982

A

Belgium refused residence to 2 French nationals working as prostitutes. Belgian law did not prohibit prostitution only incidental activities.

HELD - where a member state has no domestic legislation against the activity, they cannot refuse residence to non-nationals on that basis.

59
Q

R v Capenter [2002]

A

Filipino national had overstayed her tourist visa married to Mr Carpenter, a British national who ran a business selling advertising space in journals. Breach of Art. 8 - Deport Mrs Carpenter was a disproportionate interference.

60
Q

Commission v France

A

french required french merchant ships to employe a ration of 3 french crew to non french

61
Q

Art 1(2) reg 492/2011

A

the right to take up employment with same priority as nationals of the host member state.

62
Q

Arti 3(1) 492/2011

A

Allows conditions relating to linguistic knowledge requried by reasona fo the nature of the post to be filled e.g. UK salesman must be able to speak English. Justifiable restriction. (Groener v Minister for Education)

63
Q

A 6(1) 492/2011

A

Engagement and recruitment must not be subject to discriminatory tests or other criteria

64
Q

A 7(1) 492/2011

A

No discrimination on the grounds of nationality in relation to ANY condition of employment

65
Q

A 7(3) 492/2011

A

Training. Foreign nationals should be given access to training on the same terms as home nationals.

66
Q

Art 7(2) 492/2011

A

same social and tax advantages (e.g. perks, tax rates etc.) Cristina v SNCF [1975]

67
Q

URBSFA v Bosman version of Cassis de Dijon

A

“rules could be justified if they pursued a legitimate aim compatible with the Treaty and were justified by pressing reasons of public interest.”