Wounding With Intent To Injure Flashcards

1
Q

Act and section

A

Sec 188(2) Crimes Act 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Penalty

A

7 Years Imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ingredients

WITIAPOWRDFTSOO
W, M, DOCGBH
TAP

A

1) With Intent to Injure any person or

With reckless disregard for the safety of others

2) Wounds, maims, disfigures or causes GBH
3) To any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Intent

A

Mean to do it. They desire a specific result and act with the aim or purpose of achieving it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Case law:

R v Mohan

A

A decision to bring about. In so far as it lies within the accused’s powering, the commission of the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case law:

R v Waaka

A

A fleeting or passing thought is insufficient. There must be a firm intent or firm purpose to effect an act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case law:

R v Taisalika

A

The nature of the blow and the gash which it produced on the complainant’s head would point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Injure - Sec 2 Crimes Act 1961

A

Means to cause actual bodily harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case law:

R v Donnovan

A

Bodily harm includes any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim. It need not be permanent, but must, no doubt, be more than merely transitory or trifling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Or With Reckless Disregard for the safety of others

A

Acting recklessly involves consciously and deliberately taking an unjustifiable risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Case law:

R V Harney

A

Recklessness involves foresight of dangerous consequences that could happen, together with an intention to continue a course of conduct regardless of the risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Case law:

R v Waters (WOUND)

A

A breaking in the continuity of the skin with the flow of blood and can be internal or external.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Maims

A

Will involve mutilating, crippling or disabling part of the body so the victim is deprived permanently of the use of a limb or one of the senses. There needs to be some degree of permanence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Disfigures

A

To disfigure means to deform or deface, mar or alter the figure or appearance of a person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Case law:

R v Rapana and Murray

A

The word disfigure covers not only permanent damage but also temporary damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Grievous bodily harm

A

Grievous bodily harm can be defined as harm that is really serious.

17
Q

DPP v Smith

A

Bodily harm needs no explanation and grievous means no more and no less than really serious.

18
Q

Any person

A

Gender neutral. Proven by judicial notice or circumstantial evidence.