Workshop #3 Flashcards

1
Q

Portion of patients with the diagnosis that have the physical sign (have the positive result)

A

Sensitivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Portion of patients without the diagnosis that lack the physical sign (have the negative result).

A

Specificity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Physical signs with a high ___________, greatly increase the probability of the disease when signs are present

A

Specificity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sppin =

A

A Specific test when Positive rules IN disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

SnNout =

A

A Sensitive test when Negative rules OUT disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

used for for determining if the symptom is a predictor of the hypotheses

A

LR(+), LR(-), and anything in between

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how much a positive test result increases the probability of disease

A

positive likelihood ratio LR(+)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how much a negative test result decreases the probability of a disease

A

negative likelihood ratio LR(-)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Likelihood Ratios:

  1. 3 = ____%
  2. 0 = ____%
A
  1. 3= (-) -25%

3. 0= (+) 20%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Likelihood Ratios of ___ - ____ indicate poor likelihood data

A

0.4 - 2.9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

LR of __________ = no likelihood of disease

A

0.3 or less

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

LR of _________ = high likelihood of disease

A

3.0 or more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Something you expect to see, and it is there

Something I expect to find that is there and supports my hypothesis

A

Significant Positive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Something you do not expect to see, and it supports that they do not have this hypothesis
(Rules out other hypothesis to try to get closer to the one you want them to have)

A

Significant Negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The absence of __________ will support the hypothesis

A

Significant Negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Both of these strengthen your diagnosis

A

Significant Positive and Negatives

17
Q

SOAP Note Order

A
Subjective Data
Objective Data
    -Evidence/Labs
Assessment (Diagnosis)
Plan (Orders + Follow Up if needed)
18
Q

Any Lab or Diagnostic that can be done at that visit, add it to the bottom of the _________ section

A

Objective

19
Q

Evidence Grade ____:
Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Several high-quality studies with consistent results
In special cases: one large, high-quality multi-centre trial

A

A

20
Q

Evidence Grade _____:
Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
One high-quality study
Several studies with some limitations

A

B

21
Q

Evidence Grade _____:
Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
One or more studies with severe limitations

A

C

22
Q

Evidence Grade _____:
Any estimate of effect is very uncertain.
Expert opinion
No direct research evidence
One or more studies with very severe limitations

A

D

23
Q

Consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence

A

Grade A

24
Q

Inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence

A

Grade B

25
Q

Consensus, disease-oriented evidence *, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series for studies of diagnosis, treatment, prevention, or screening

A

Grade C

26
Q

level of evidence thatrepresents research results that address clinical outcomes and meet an extensive set of quality criteria that minimizes bias.

A

Level I (Likely Reliable)

27
Q

level of evidencethat represents research results that address clinical outcomes and demonstrate some method of scientific investigation but do not meet the quality criteria to achieve Level 1.

A

Level 2 (Mid-Level)

28
Q

level of evidencerepresents either of the following:
Reports that are not based on scientific analysis of clinical outcomes (e.g., case series, case reports, conclusions extrapolated indirectly from scientific studies)
Research results that do not address clinical outcomes, regardless of the scientific rigor

A

Level 3 (Lacking Direct)