workshop 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Morbidity: what is it and how is it measured?

A

“The state of being symptomatic or unhealthy for a disease or condition”

  • Usually represented or estimated using prevalence or incidence
  • Prevalence describes the proportion of the population with a given symptom or quality
  • Incidence shows the frequency at which individuals within a specific population develop a symptom or quality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Morbidity: Prevalence being measured

A

Number of affected peoples/Total number of individuals within a specific population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Morbidity: Incidence being measured

A

Number of new cases/Number of individuals within the same population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is mortality and how is it measured?

A

“the number of deaths caused
by the health event under
investigation”

• Communicated as a rate of an absolute number

• Mortality usually get
represented as a rate per 1000 individuals – also known as death rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how is Mortality measured properly?

A

deaths in a given time in a given population/Total population

This number then can be multiplied by 1000 to reflect the “per 1000” rate of the target of population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is biological plausibility?

A

Establishing the cause
-and-effect relationship between a biological factor and a particular disease
Establishing whether correlation means causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the 8 parts of the Bradford hill Criteria?

A
  1. Strength
  2. Consistency
  3. Specificity
  4. Temporality
  5. Biological gradient
  6. Biological Plausibility
  7. Coherence
  8. Experiment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Bradford hill Criteria: what is strength?

A

(effect size) – the larger the

effect from the cause, the higher the probability of a casual link

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bradford hill Criteria: what is Consistency?

A

(reproducibility) – proposed causality needs to be observed in more than time point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bradford hill Criteria: what is Specificity?

A

causation requires a very specific population with a very specific disease with no other possible explanations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Bradford hill Criteria: what is Temporality?

A

the proposed effect must occur after the cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bradford hill Criteria: what is Biological gradient?

A

dose-response effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bradford hill Criteria: what is Biological Plausibility?

A

biological mechanism between cause and effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bradford hill Criteria: what is Coherence?

A

does the cause and effect fit with what we know?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bradford hill Criteria: what is Experiment?

A

does a group that lacks

exposure to the effect exhibit a difference outcome?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what’s the evidence behind BMI?

A
  • 300,000 people WITHOUT disease were classified using their BMI
  • A direct correlation between HIGHER BMI and a HIGHER risk for heart attacks, strokes, and high blood pressure
  • Increase in BMI by 1 SD above the average was linked with a 13% increased risk for cardiovascular events
17
Q

what are other field methods of measuring obesity?

A
  • Waist circumference
  • Waist-to-hip ratio
  • Skinfold thicknesses
  • Bioelectrical impedance
18
Q

strengths of BMI?

A

Easy

Cheap

Strongly correlated with body fat levels

HUNDREDS of studies have
linked BMI as a prediction of
risk of chronic disease and
early death

19
Q

weaknesses of BMI?

A

Doesn’t distinguish between body fat and lean mass

Cheap BMI doesn’t account for fat distribution

20
Q

strengths of waist circumferences?

A

Easy

Cheap

Strongly correlated with body fat levels

Some studies have linked WC as a prediction of risk of chronic disease and early death

21
Q

weaknesses of waist circumferences?

A

Its not an EXACT science, non standardized approach

Lack of good comparison

Difficult to measure in larger individuals

22
Q

strengths of waist-to-hip ratio?

A

Strongly correlated with body fat levels

Cheap

Studies indicate a good prediction with disease and death in adults

23
Q

weaknesses of waist-to-hip ratio?

A

Prone to error

More difficult to measure

Hard to interpret, is it due to one or the other? Lose key information

Difficult to measure in lager
individuals

24
Q

strengths of skin fold thickness?

A

Convenient

Cheap

Safe

Fast & easy

25
Q

weaknesses of skin fold thickness?

A

Not very accurate

Difficult to measure in lager
individuals

26
Q

strengths of Bioelectrical impedance?

A

Convenient

Cheap (ISH)

Fast and easy

Portable

27
Q

weaknesses of Bioelectrical impedance?

A

Hard to calibrate

Ratio of body water to fat may be change during illness, dehydration or weight loss, decreasing accuracy

Not ‘VERY’ accurate

Not very accurate at all in
bigger individuals

28
Q

what are some more intense approaches?

A

Computerized tomography & Magnetic resonance imaging

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)

Dilution Method (Hydrometric)- using isotope labelled water

Underwater Weighing (Densitometry)

Air-Displacement Plethysmography

29
Q

cross sectional studies summary

A
  • Epidemiology is based on centuries (and more!) of scientific research
  • A lack of longitudinal funding means knowledge is often based on cross-sectional data
  • CANNOT establish cause and effect from cross-sectional studies
  • We can going to learn how this translates to policy and practice