Working Memory Flashcards
The Modal Model of Memory:
Atkinson & Shriffin (1968)
Sensory Memory: Large multi-modal capacity, but very brief
Short-term Memory (STM): Limited Capacity Storage (7+ items), 15 – 30 seconds, information easily lost
Long-Term Memory (LTM): Unlimited Storage, encoded based on meaning
Evidence for STM & LTM Stores
Amnesic patients have preserved STM, but impaired LTM
Patient KC, has intact digit span (see video on study direct), but he has no long-term memory for events
Modal Model & Long Term Recency
Task: Free Recall of US Presidents
Results: Clear recency effect despite recall from LTM
Also, providing a continual distractor on every trial does not
abolish recency effect!
Main Problems with the Modal Model
Difficult to explain long-term recency effects
Role of rehearsal in encoding from STM to LTM?
(repetition does not guarantee good LTM & you
remember things that you don’t rehearse)
NOT a single STM or LTM store
Evidence for multiple STM Stores
Dual Task Method
Press a button to indicate whether the sentence is True or False:
A precedes B – AB (true)
B does not follow A – AB (false)
Repeat a string of digits at the same time.
Results: Increasing digit load increases reasoning time, BUT no effect on errors.
Working Memory Model
Baddeley & Hitch (1974)
Baddeley and Hitch argued that working memory must
comprise different components.
Dual Task Method
Press a button to indicate whether
the sentence is True or False:
A precedes B – AB (true)
B does not follow A – AB (false)
Repeat a string of digits at the same time.
Results: Increasing digit load increases reasoning time, BUT no effect on errors.
Evidence for Phonological Store
- Phonological Similarity Effect
- Word Length Effect
- Irrelevant Speech Effects
- Brain Evidence
Irrelevant Speech Effects
Recall series of visually presented digits:
Recall disrupted if study accompanied by:
(1). Spoken Words
(2). Nonsense Syllables
Recall not disrupted if study accompanied by:
(1). Silence
(2). Noise / tones
Salame & Baddeley (1982)
• Irrelevant speech gains access to the phonological store and corrupts the memory trace
• There is a filter based on “speech-like” sound that gates access to the store
Phonological Store: Brain Evidence
Paulescu et al. (1993)
1. Short-Term Memory Tasks
Verbal Task: Participants rehearsed a string of letters followed by a question
“B”, “Y”, “L”, “P”, “S” Was the letter “E” present?
Visual Control Task: Presentation of Korean characters followed by a question
Was the character present?
à Verbal task requires both the phonological store and articulatory loop
2. Matching Tasks
Verbal Task: Monitor each letter & press a button if it rhymes with “B”
“B”, “Y”, “L”, “P”, “S” Press a button if the letter rhymes with “B”
Visual Control Task: Monitor each Korean character & press a button if it matches
Does the character match?
The Visuospatial Sketchpad
Necessary for holding online a sequence of
visually guided actions.1. Visual Cache: passively stores visual information
about form and colour (similar to phonological store)
2. Inner Scribe: stores spatial and movement
information and can rehearse the contents of the
visual cache (similar to articulatory loop)
The Central Executive
Most complex and least understood component of WM model
The CE coordinates processing in the slave systems by
controlling and allocating attention
Adopted the Norman & Shallice (1986) model of attentional
control
Actions are controlled by two processes:
1. Habits or schemas guided by environmental cues
2. An attentionally limited controller (supervisory attentional system)
The CE carries out processing such as monitoring behaviour,
switching attention, inhibiting inappropriate actions
Manipulating the Central Executive
Baddeley et al. (1998)
Task: Random number generation (tapping number keys) while simultaneously engaging in other tasks
Results:
1. Redundancy in randomness (i.e., being less random) increases with digit load
2. Random generation and other tasks such as verbal fluency strongly engage the CE
Brain Evidence for Central Executive
Two Tasks: 1) Semantic judgement task (is it a
vegetable?) on verbally presented words, and 2)
Spatial rotation task on visually presented items.
Performed separately or together (dual task).
Results:
1. No activation in prefrontal cortex if the tasks
are performed separately (but activation
elsewhere in brain)
2. Activation in prefrontal cortex if tasks are
performed together
Problems with the standard WM Model
Issues with the phonological store:
Articulatory suppression typically reduces digit span for visually
presented words from 7 to 5
• But not a devastating impact!
• It should prevent information from getting into phonological store!
A span of around 16 words is possible if the words are presented
as prose (e.g., a meaningful sentence)
The Episodic Buffer
“A limited capacity temporary storage system capable
of integrating information from a variety of sources”
Episodic: integrates information across space & time
• Can be preserved in densely amnesic patients with impaired long-term
episodic memory
Multi-dimensional coding (not phonological, visual or spatial in
nature)
Enables long-term memory to interact with working memory
Controlled by the central executive
• CE can retrieve info from the EB, manipulate it and modify it if necessary