Work, Poverty and Welfare - Paper 2 Flashcards
Paper 2
What is the poverty line?
people living on or below 60% of the median income
What is absolute poverty?
A person living in absolute poverty lacks the minimum necessary for survival - resorting to food banks and not being able to pay water bills
How many people were living in poverty in 2017/18?
14.8 million (8m working age adults, 4 million children 2 million pensioners) with the Joseph Rowntree foundation finding little change in overall poverty for more than 15 years
Why are there difficulties in defining absolute poverty?
Difficulty in identifying basic needs objectively. Rowntree’s minimum budget was based on a list of nutritional and other requirements and based on the views of those who made the list e.g., ignores the reality of people’s lives - ill health. Ignores impact of cultural expectations - socialising, attending events, tech, clothes etc.
Who came up with the deprivation index?
Townsend
What did Townsend argue?
That individuals can be considered to be in poverty when they lack the resources to obtain types of diets, participate in certain activities etc. leading to exclusion from society
What is the deprivation index?
A list of goods and services that if people could not afford were considered poor
What are the strengths of the concept of relative poverty?
- Recognises that poverty is a social construct
- Recognises that the definition of poverty changes over time in the same society
- Links poverty to wider issues of social exclusion
What are the weaknesses of the concept of relative poverty?
- Not an indicator of poverty, more social inequality - relative poverty exists at every class level
- Based on the values of experts not members of the public
- Measure of absolute poverty is much more scientific and easy to measure
What is social exclusion?
Townsend used social exclusion as a measure of poverty. This allowed poverty to be understood through interconnecting disadvantages such as bad health suggesting there is more to poverty than just low income
What is the minimum standard of living?
The centre of research social policy and the JRF developed the minimum income standard for defining relative poverty. A single person needed an income of £16,300 a year before tax. Nuclear - £20,300 from each parent
What are the cultural explanations of poverty?
- Culture of poverty
- New right: dependency culture and welfare state
- Charles Murray
- Myths of welfare state
What do cultural explanations of poverty do?
Focus on the behaviour and attitudes of the poor. Theories are often victim blaming arguing there is a shared set of values that make people reliant on others such as the state
What is the culture of poverty?
Oscar lewis studied cultural attitudes of the poor in Mexico and Puerto Rico suggesting the poor have their own culture of poverty with distinct norms and values. Children that grow up in this culture are socialised into these values so remain poor due to their values
Who investigated the culture of poverty?
Oscar Lewis
What are the norms and values Lewis found of the poor?
- Resigned to their situation and don’t take opportunities to change it when they arise
- Sense of fatalism
- Reluctant to work
- Don’t plan for the future - present time orientated
- Don’ts see themselves as part of mainstream society - marginalised
How do the New Right view people in poverty?
As undeserving
What does Marsland argue about poverty?
Poverty persists because of the generosity of the welfare state claiming:
- Handouts from a nanny state have created a dependency culture - people are happy to live on benefits rather than work
- Universal welfare benefits regardless of income e.g., child benefit being available to all stops money being invested into the economy
- Universal benefits should be stopped and only given to those who are disabled or long term sick. Any that can work should
- Job seekers allowance - demonstrating actively seeking work to continue receiving benefits. Cuts to the amount that people receive. 2020 universal credit roll out - people receive one payment per month from which they have to pay rent and council tax
What is Marsland?
New Right
What does Murray believe about poverty?
- There is an emerging underclass in 1980s Britain who were responsbile for rising rates of crime and unemployment
- These people were happy to claim welfare benefits and live in a ‘deviant’ family structure such as single parenting (PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
- This leads to dependency culture
- Children brought up in SPFs were more likely to become criminal due to a lack of primary socialisation
What are the arguments that welfare benefits do lead to dependency culture?
- People get paid for not working and perverse incentives may lead them to carry on
- NR - easier to claim benefits than find work
What are the arguments that welfare benefits don’t lead to dependency culture?
- People on welfare benefits are in need of it and they’re not doing it to drain the state because they have no other choice
- State and ruling class have vast wealth which should be distributed
What are the criticisms of Murray?
- Without benefits, there would be more crime due to rise in absolute poverty because crime would be necessary to survive e.g., fraud or burglary
- Scapegoating the poor for their situation is an example of victim blaming and ignorance because they are saying the poor are deserving of their situation. He ignores individual factors/experiences. He doesn’t provide adequate solutions to fix poverty
- Genetic modification of the poor is unethical because being poor isn’t a genetic fault there is no biological link. Placed into situation due to factors out of their control, society has constructed poverty not nature
What are the myths of the welfare state?
- There are generations of work shy families - there are only 0.3% of households with 2 or more generations where neither generation have worked
- Benefits are too generous - £77 a week
- The benefit bill is too high because of benefit cheats - it is a normal amount
- Most claimants are sitting at home on benefits for years
- Most welfare spending goes on the unemployed
- We are spending vast amounts on large families with too many children
What are the criticisms of cultural explanations of poverty?
- There is no clear evidence that children inherit their parent’s behaviour - Rutter and Madge found at least half of children born into poverty do not repeat the behaviour. It is too deterministic as it ignores free will and choice it is victim blaming. Shildrick argued there is no evidence of a dependency culture he found only 9.5% of households had a culture of worklessness
- Blaming victims. rather than causes - their theories blame the poor for their situation and fail to consider structural factors/ Marxists argue it is easier to blame the poor than the government
- They are based on myths around the welfare state. Baumberg, Bell and Gaffney suggest that the new right view of the underclass is based on a constant polluting flow of misinformation from the government and the media
What are material explanations of poverty?
- Blame lack of material support; inadequate welfare state and basic lack of funding from those in poverty
- Economic and social position of groups like this with low pay, the rich, elderly and unemployed influence behaviour of the poor
- Hopelessness of the future leads to a live in the moment attitude (present time orientated)
- Attitudes and values are a response to being poor no the cause
Coates and Silburn - emphasised how the poor are trapped due to circumstance - they called this the cycle of deprivation e..g, child born into poverty, may get ill a lot, misses lots of school, underachieves, goes into low paid job or unemployment and experiences poverty as an adult
What is the social democratic view of the underclass?
- Consists of people right at the bottom of the social hierarchy; whose poverty means they are excluded from taking part in society
- Field suggests this group consists of the elderly, lone parents, long term unemployed, disabled, low paid and long term sick
- They are forced to rely on inadequate state benefits which are too low to give acceptable standard of living
- Many migrant workers and asylum seekers work illegally in very low paid jobs as they cannot claim benefits. They are stuck in the poverty trap
Why do the poor pay more?
Cost of living is higher for the poor, they are immediately disadvantaged and the cost of living hinders them if they try to escape poverty:
- Poor quality homes that are expensive to heat and maintain
- Cost of home and car insurance is high as there are higher crime rates in the area
- Have to buy cheap clothing which doesn’t last
- Have to pay more for food as they can only afford ot buy in small quantities e.g., Costco good value but need membership/car
- May have to shop at the corner shop which is more expensive as they don’t have a car to get to the supermarket
- Pay more for credit as they have to go to loan sharks
- Suffer more ill health and have to pay non-prescription medicine e.g., painkillers
What is the marxist view of the underclass?
- Miliband is critical that the poor are an underclass. They see them as not separate but simply the most disadvantaged of the working class.
- They see them as not separate but simple the most disadvantaged of WC
- Argue that all working class could join this group if they become sick, unemployed or disabled. To solve this we need to destroy the capitalist system
What are structural explanations of poverty?
Poverty arises from the structure of inequality in a capitalist society. Wealth is unequally distributed. They suggest the poor lack the ability to change their position
What are marxist structural explanations of poverty?
The poor are poor because they are exploited by the rich
What are Weberian structural explanations of poverty?
They lack skills and power, weak market position
What are Functionalist structural explanations of poverty?
They serve a purpose in maintaining society
What is wealth?
Property in the form of assets that a person can sell for cash. Wealth and assets survey in 2015 measured wealth in each household measuring: marketable wealth, non-marketable wealth, productive property and consumption property
What is income?
The money people get from work earned income, benefits or if they own property and rent it out
What is disposable income?
What you have left over after paying tax
What is discretionary income?
What is left after tax, bills, food and travel costs
What do functionalists say about the distribution of wealth/poverty?
- There is always going to be rich and poor people in society, inequality is needed for it to function
- Meritocracy - succeed on own hard work
- Everything in society has a purpose. Durkheim said institutions work together to keep society going, if one fails, they all do - organic analogy. Inequality in wealth is needed for society to function
What do marxists say about the distribution of wealth/poverty?
- Everyone should be equal and that there should be an equal distribution of wealth
- Proletariat are unfairly disadvantaged by the bourgeoisie - exploitation
- Inherited wealth - meritocracy is a myth
How have the government attempted to redistribute wealth?
- Inheritance tax: tax payable on money inherited
- Capital gains tax: intended to reduce profits from dealing property and shares is payable when these are sold
- Income tax: payable on both earned and unearned income and increases as wage does
- Social welfare benefits: these are from the state and are a way of using taxes form the wealth to support the poorest in society
Why haven’t attempts to redistribute wealth worked?
The rising cost of living and wages and benefits not meeting this, changes in government, tax goes back into government and isn’t used to redistribute wealth to poor, greed of upper class (marxism), stigma - some may not claim benefits they’re entitled to.
The wealthiest 10% of households owned 45% of overall wealth, the bottom half of households owned 9% of overall wealth
What is the distribution and extent of poverty in UK social groups?
14.6 million living in poverty:
- 33.6% of all children live in poverty
- 50% of those in poverty are on low incomes or without a job
- 16% of pensioners are in poverty
- 46% of lone parents are in poverty
- Ethnic background can increase likelihood of being in poverty: 65% of Bangladeshis, 45% of Black Africans and 25% of Indians
- Disabled make up 28% of those in poverty
What does postmodernism do?
Focuses on individual experiences
What do post structural feminists say about poverty?
Double disadvantage - Racism and sexism
What do marxists say about ethnicity and poverty?
Structural explanations - racism and lower social class exploitation
What do functionalists say about ethnicity and poverty?
Poverty helps to motivate and discipline society, all roles need filling, it is functionally important
What do the new right say about ethnicity and poverty?
Cultural explanations - norms and values of different family types - links to Modood
What do Kenway and Palmer say about ethnicity and poverty?
Almost 50% of children from EMG are in poverty, Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Chinese families most likely to be affected
What are the reasons for EMG being in poverty?
- Low pay: Purdah - women kept separately from men so men work
- Unemployment: higher amongst Bangladeshis, Pakistanis, Black Africans and Black Caribbeans
- Discrimination in employment: Wood - racism in rectutment
- Underachievement in education: Ball - ethnocentric curriculum
- Family types: Modood - differences in values, family types (SPF)
What do marxists say about age and poverty?
Structural factors lead to the elderly being in poverty, the way society is structured is the reason
What do functionalists say about age and poverty?
They’d argue that elderly being in poverty is good for society as they’ve served their function, society needs poverty to function correctly
What do the new right say about age and poverty?
Murray: children are in poverty due to poor parenting and lack of socialisation in the underclass created by a generous Nanny state. This means that people are having children to get a council house and be on benefits, this will be a cycle and the reason for poverty continuing as the children see their parents do it so think it is right
What are the reasons for different age groups being in poverty?
- Child poverty can cause wider social problems e.g., crime and bullying due to not being able to afford things
- Older people are less likely to live in poverty, children are more likely to live in a low income household - 33.6% of children in UK live in poverty
- Hirsch: causes material and social hardships which affects education and has lasting effects on physical and emotional health. greater risk of poverty as adults
What are the factors that lead to greater risk of poverty in age groups
- Lone parenthood
- Lack of work or low paid parents
- Disability of parents
- Lack of benefits
- Lack of support - cost of childcare
What do marxists say about disability and poverty?
Structural factors lead to those with disabilities being in poverty
What do functionalists say about disability and poverty?
The disabled being in poverty is good because it creates jobs in health and social care
What do the new right say about disability and poverty?
Murray: Those on disability benefits could be working and not relying on the system
What does Palmer say about disability and poverty?
33% of disabled adults are living in povety, 2/5 are single adults looking after kids due to lack of day to day support they experience social exclusion
What are the reasons for those with disabilities being in poverty?
- Inadequate welfare benefits: not enough to keep people out of poverty especially with rising cost of living. Disability benefits haven’t increased at the same rate as those for children and the elderly
- Discrimination from employers: discrimination against those with disabilities although illegal it often happens because of the cost of adaptations or appointment absences
- Low pay: more likely to be in a low paid position which impacts future pensions especially if they need to retire early because of physical problems
- Unemployment: those with disabilities are 4X more likely to be unemployed even if they have similar qualifications
- Inability to undertake paid employment: disabilities prohibit it if they are welfare dependant
What do marxists say about gender and poverty?
Structural factors lead to women being in poverty or given low paid jobs - employers worry about maternity leave. It is better for capitalism for women to be at home
What do functionalists say about gender and poverty?
Women should be married they shouldn’t work to raise the children as this is society’s structure
What do the new right say about gender and poverty?
Women are more likely to be lone parents because of perverse incentives - council houses
What are the reasons for genders being in poverty?
20% of both males and females live in poverty
- single female pensioners higher risk
- Women of all ethnic backgrounds have lower average income - glass ceiling
- Women are more likely to take up part time work and be low paid –> miss out on work related welfare benefits
- Women are responsible for childcare –> Ferri and Smith (Dual burden)
- Women are the majority of homeworkers who usually do jobs which fit around children - body shop or scentsy consultancy which means they’re only paid on what they sell so no employment rights
- Women are more likely to be lone parents with the responsibility of children
- Women are more likely to sacrifice standard of living for themselves to provide –> Middleton: mothers sacrifice no food for themselves to provide e.g., clothes and holidays
- Women live longer than men so lack of pensions means more poverty in old age
What are Davis and Moore?
Functionalists
What is Gans?
Functionalist
What do Davis and Moore say about the distribution of poverty, wealth and income?
Role Allocation
Inequalities in wealth and income are needed to maintain society:
- Some positions in society are more functionally important than others. These require specialist skills that not everyone in society has the ability to acquire
- Those who do have the ability to do these jobs must be motivated and encouraged to undertake lengthy training with the promise of high wages. There must be a system of unequal rewards to make sure the most able to get the highest positions
A functionally important job e.g., doctor is a long process to be qualified but physically demanding and low paid footballers and influencers don’t necessarily have a difficult job but get paid very highly
What does Gans say about the distribution of poverty, wealth and income?
Gans argues that the existence of poverty has important functions for the stability of society because:
- The existence of poverty makes sure that the undesirable, dirty and dangerous jobs are done as people do these who have no choice
- Poverty creates job occupations, such as social workers, debt advisors
- The treat of poverty keeps people working even if for low rewards and reinforces values of a hard-honest day’s work
- Some sectors thrive on having a high number of people on low paid role e.g., Health service and clothing industry
What are the criticisms of functionalist explanations for the distribution of poverty, wealth and income?
No way of deciding which jobs are more important - can change over time, some have inherited wealth - class system isn’t enforced. Some are not motivated by a financial reward of higher pay. Poverty may not motivate people to work to avoid it - Murray and nanny state
What does Weber say about the distribution of poverty, wealth and income?
Inequalities in wealth and income exist due to the different market situations of individuals - different skills a person has and how much it is worth. Some have skills, talents and abilities that are in demand such as scientists or doctors. In our celeb-based society celebrities get higher rewards for their skills.
Poverty arises when a person is in a weak market situation - they may lack the skills needed to earn reward of high pay or have barriers which stop them acquiring those skills - sexism-gender pay gap, glass ceiling. Ageism and racism, dysfunctional family - weak support system
What are the strengths of weberian explanations for the distribution of poverty, wealth and income?
- Recognises individual situations compared to functionalists
- Recognises skills qualifications - still relevant to society
- Focuses on other factors than class (more useful than marxism)
What are the criticisms of weberian explanations for the distribution of poverty, wealth and income?
- What you’re born into - Marxist view
- Outdated - postmodernists
- Murray would criticise as market situation is based on norms and values and attitudes, no skills/quals which gives underclass an excuse
What do Miliband and Westergaard and Resler say about the distribution of poverty, wealth and income?
Suggest that wealth and income inequality and the existence of poverty lies in the private ownership of the means of production. The concentration of ownership means that all of this is owned by a small number of upper class - this makes them a lot of unearned income
What are Miliband and Westergaard and Resler?
Marxists
What are the key marxist arguments about the distribution of poverty, wealth and income?
- Wealth and income is concentrated in the hands of the ruling class, this creates inequality
- Poverty is inevitable in a capitalist society
- The working class keep the inequality going by working for the ruling class through cheap labour
- The existence of non-working poor keeps wages down as there are always new workers looking for low paid jobs
- Poverty divides the working class into us and them and helps maintain false class consciousness
- Divide and rule - divide up working class to rule over them
What are the criticisms of marxist explanations for the distribution of poverty, wealth and income?
It fails to consider individual differences - gender, age, people with disabilities, race/ethnic group and sexuality. Post structural feminists would consider the double disadvantage of racism and sexism
Post modernists focus on the individual person
What is the welfare state?
One that is concerned with implementing social policies guaranteeing the ‘cradle to the grave’ wellbeing of the population. The welfare state in Britain mainly began with he Beveridge Report of 1942 which was based on full employment, universal welfare, free healthcare and education and that women would be housewives and mothers
What did the Beveridge Report say the welfare services aimed to destroy?
The 5 Giants
What are the 5 giants?
Want - greed, dissatisfaction, no money
Ignorance - homelessness, more exploitation, lack of education, crime rates increasing, discrimination - led to free education
Disease - illness lack of health, no NHS led to NHS
Squalor - not living in good conditions, homelessness, council houses, leads to ignorance and want
Idleness - lack in financial needs, social deprivation, job seeking
What are the advantages of the welfare state?
- Provides a safety net when private sectors fail e.g., given benefits by the government if a business fails or loans in construction/care businesses
- More likely to provide a wider range of services e.g., social services cover housing, family difficulties, extracurricular clubs, homelessness, support for young people, ill and cradle to grave. Full care - holistic care for the whole person cradle to grave
- Can easily be held to account for their failings e.g., underperforming schools will be judged by competitive standard, getting harder each year. Parents, Ofsted, general public - taxpayer held accountable
What services did the welfare state provide paid for by taxation?
Benefits: welfare and child benefits, state pension, universal credit. COVID 0 furlough
Free NHS: maternity checkups, mental health services free prescriptions to 16, subsided treatments and prescriptions
Free compulsory education: till 18, nursery free 15 hours, range of schools and colleges with specialities, choice of quals and apprenticeships, university/tuition fee loans and maintenance loans
Social services: mental health services, child protection, children in care get extracurricular activities paid for, support fostering and adoption, respite care - people with disabilities, housing support - residential/care
What are the disadvantages of the welfare state?
- It is often at the mercy of funding from the government which can be cut as we have seen in the NHS and salary being cut. Police funds cut money not spent wisely by the government. More unemployment - less taxpayers. Universal credit decreasing
- Too much demand can place the service under incredible pressure e.g., the NHS waiting lists and during COVID the lack of doctors/nurses for patients
What is welfare pluralism?
Welfare provided by the public sector (state), private companies, voluntary organisations, charities, families and community groups
How can we link theories to welfare pluralism?
Less stress on government - shared responsibility
Functionalism - organic analogy
New right - shouldn’t depend on government nanny state
Postmodernism - focuses on specific social groups - targeted support
What is informal welfare provision?
Welfare provided informally and for free by family and friends
What are the COVID statistics about carers?
13.6 million carers during COVID but statistics could be invalid and inaccurate - large amount unaccounted for (dark figure)
Why do the government benefit from informal welfare provision?
They don’t have to spend money on taking care of people, less pressure on government and reduces dependency culture.