WK 2 - Sources of UK Constitution Flashcards

• Describe the different sources of the UK Constitution • Explain the relationship between the different sources of the UK Constitution

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define a ‘source’ of UK constitution

A

Where we find the rules and principles of constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Name the sources of UK constitution (4)

A
  1. Legislation (Acts of Parliament)
  2. Constitutional conventions
  3. Judge-made law
  4. International law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why isn’t legislation easy to distinguish as a source of UK constitution?

A

Uncodified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How to identify purpose of legislation

A

Identification:-

Does it organise and allocate powers to institutions of government, or regulate relationship between individual and state?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give examples of legislation which organises/allocates powers to institutions of government

A

Scotland Act 1998 (devolution), Constitutional
Reform Act 2005 (separation of powers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give examples of legislation which regulates relationship between the individual and state

A

Magna Carta 1215, Bill of Rights 1689, Human Rights Act 1998

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Is ‘constitutional’ legislation more important than other legislation? (Traditionally)

A

No - all have same value.

‘Neither the Act of Union with Scotland nor the Dentists Act (1878) has more claim than the other to be considered a supreme law.’ - AV Dicey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the traditional view on the hierarchy of legislation?

A

There is no hierarchy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the modern view on the hierarchy of legislation? Whose view is this?

A

Laws LJ - hierarchy between ‘ordinary’ and ‘constitutional’ statutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain implied repeal

A

If two laws conflict, more recent prevails, even if later Act doesn’t expressly repeal previous Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Laws LJ’s view on constitutional statutes + use case to demonstrate

A

Implied repeal should not apply to constitutional statutes

Thoburn v Sunderland City Council [2002]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Name two UKSC cases which support Thoburn

A

○ R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport [2014]

○ R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does the need for express repeal effect the flexibility of constitution?

A

Not much - they may be harder to amend, but only requires another ordinary law to expressly repeal constitutional statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Break down judge-made law (3)

A
  • Judicial interpretation
  • Common law
  • Common law constitutional principles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain judicial interpretation

A

In UK, judges cannot strike down laws, but must interpret them in a way which changes their meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain common law

A
  • Judges making new law.
  • Good administration principles developed through judicial review of government action
  • Procedurally fair, reasonable + rational
17
Q

Give an example of common law constitutional principles

A

Rule of Law

18
Q

Is judge-made law inferior to legislation? Why?

A
  • Parliamentary sovereignty: judge-made law can be overwritten by statute
19
Q

Explain international law

A
  • Typically, international treaties are given effect in domestic law through enactment of legislation
  • When this is not the case, domestic law should be interpreted, where possible, to conform with treaties