Witnesses 600-615 Flashcards

1
Q

What must a witness do to testify in court?

A
  1. Competency 2. Personal Knowledge 3. Oath or Affirmation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

FRE601: Title

A

Competency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Summarize 601:

A

Witnesses are presumed to be competent
Credibility may be questioned on CX
*although if state law governs an issue, state competency standards apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FRE605: Title

A

Judge’s Competency as a Witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Summarize 605:

A

Presiding judges may not testify as a witness at trial and the objection is not one that needs to be raised. It prevents judges, clerks, etc. from sharing their opinions and reporting evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

FRE606: Title

A

Juror’s competency as a witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Summarize 606

A

Jurors may not testify as witnesses before other jurors at trial
* objection should be made outside of the jury’s presence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Can counsel testify?

A

While not excluded by the FRE, the code of ethics frowns upon it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

FRE602: Title

A

Need for personal knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

FRE603: Title

A

Oath or Affirmation to testify truthfully

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Summarize 602:

A

A witness needs personal knowledge of the matter, with the exception of expert testimony under 702

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Summarize 603

A

A witness must swear to testify truthfully, but it just needs to convey their promise to be truthful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

FRE604: Title

A

Interpreter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Summarize 604

A

An interpreter must be (1) qualified and (2) give an oath or affirmation to make a true translation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Summarize 611

A

Reasonable control, limited cross to direct’s scope and credibility, potentially open (courts discretion); Leading questions prohibited unless cross (hostile witness, adverse party, identify with adverse party)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

FRE614: Title

A

Courts calling and examining a witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

FRE614

A

A court may call a witness on its own, or at a party’s request, Parties entitled to CX, court may examine on its own, Party may object at that times or next time jury is not present

18
Q

FRE615: Title?

A

Excluding witnesses

19
Q

Summarize 615

A

When requested, the court must exclude witnesses, or may do so on its own, unless: Party is a natural person, officer/employee designated as party representative, presence is essential, or statutorily authorized

Invoked by parties, or judge

20
Q

What is an argumentative objection?

A

Attorney is drawing inferences or making conclusions

21
Q

Asked and Answered

A

Self Explanatory

22
Q

Assumes Facts not in evidence

A

factual assertion not yet in evidence

23
Q

Beyond the scope

A

of cross or redirect

24
Q

Narative

A

Long answers, telling a story

25
Q

Speculation

A

Asks witness to infer what others are thinking/mindset, beyond witness perceptions

26
Q

Compound

A

Illicits multiple facts

27
Q

Harrassment/Badgering the witness

A

Same question, different ways; arguing with the witness; insulting the witness

28
Q

Improper characterization

A

Attorney alters the testimony when posing the question to the witness

29
Q

Leading

A

If direct, or suggests a specific answer

30
Q

Non-responsive

A

Dodgy hostile witnesses

31
Q

Vague

A

Too broad for witness to answer

32
Q

612 title

A

writing used to refresh a witness’s memory

33
Q

Summarize 612:

A

An adverse party may use a writing before ro while testifying to refresh memory, it can ve produced, inspected, CX-ed over, introduced (as it relates to witness testimony)

The adverse party may introduce it into evidence even if not otherwise admissible; refreshing party may only introduce if already admissible

34
Q

607 Title

A

Who may impeach a witness

35
Q

Offensive 607 techniques

A

rebut the evidence, complete the story, clarify the ambiguous, expert testimony

36
Q

Defensive 607 Techniques

A

Impairment of perception or recollection, demonstrate inconsistencies, bias, truthfulness

37
Q

Who may impeach a witness 607

A

Any party

38
Q

613 Title?

A

Witness’s prior statement

39
Q

Summarize 613

A

A witness may be impeached by PIS, for CREDIBILITY (not truthfulness) if requested, they must disclose to attorney.
Extrinsic evidence is only permitted if justice requires, or witness given opp. to explain.
If the issue is collateral, extrinsic evidence is prejudice, delay or confusion outweigh probative value

40
Q

Summarize the 613 extrinsic/non-extrinsic evidence rules

A

Extrinsic evidence of non-collateral matter, non-extrinsic evidence on collateral or non-collateral matter admissible
Nonadmissible: Extrinsic evidence of a collateral matter