Witnesses Flashcards
in an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may only testify about
extraneous prejudicial imporperly brought to jur’s attention
- improper outside influence on any juror
- mistake in entering the verdict on the verdict sheet
dead man’s statutes
common law (abandoned by FRE) any financially interested Ws are disqualified from testifying in civil suits abt any conversations or transactions w the decedent
a W’s credibility may be attacked or supported by
reputation for truthfulness or untruthfulness
and ONLY after reputation ev has been offered:
opinions about character trait of truthfulness or untruthfulness
ev of spec acts going to W’s character for truthfulness or untruthfulness are/ arent allowed
are allowed on cross if the ct thinks they’re probative
collateral matter doctrine
if W lies about the credibility issue on xexam, counsel can’t prove the lie with extrinsic ev and must accept the answer.
-ex: W says she graduated from yale. if on cross, counsel can’t get her to say she didn’t, counsel can’t offer ev from yale that she never went there
FRE: impeachment by prior convictions
felony
if over 10y old, must be substantially more probative than prejudicial
if under 10yo, requires R 403 balancing
FRE: impeachment by prior convictions
crime of dishonesty
if over 10yo, must be substantially more probative than prejudicial
if under 10yo, admissible as a matter of right
juvenile adjudications only admissible to impeach where
crim case
it’s of a W not D
would be admissible if it was and adult thing
it’s necessary to fairly determine guilt or innocence
random: standard on appeal
in the light most favorable to the non-appealing party
writing used to refresh a W’s memory is allowed when
W has some knowledge of the purported testimony, memory is incomplete
- proper foundation has been laid
- W may refresh memory, then must testify without having the ev present
extrinsic ev of a W’s prior inconsistent statement is admissible when
W is given an opp to explain or deny the statement and adverse party is given opp to examine W about it, if justice so requires