Witness Credibility (Impeachment) Flashcards

1
Q

How may a party use a witness’s prior inconsistent statement?

A

A party may examine a witness about a prior inconsistent statement without showing the statement but, if asked, must show the opposing party’s attorney, with the statement admissible only if the witness has a chance to explain or deny it and the adverse party can examine the witness on it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When may a party use a witness’s bias or interest to impeach?

A

Any party, including the party calling the witness, may at any time show the bias or interest of a witness to impeach the witness’s credibility and veracity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When may a party use a criminal conviction to impeach?

A

Criminal convictions are admissible only to attack the witness’s character for truthfulness if

  1. the conviction was punishable by imprisonment for more than one year or
  2. involved dishonest statement or act except if the witness is a criminal defendant, then the court may admit the conviction only if its probative value outweighs its prejudicial effect.

If the conviction and release are more than ten years old, then the court may admit the conviction only if its probative value substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What about appealed convictions and juvenile adjudications?

A

A conviction is admissible if still on appeal, unless the witness received a pardon or equivalent rehabilitation, while juvenile adjudications are admissible only in criminal cases to attack a witness other than the defendant and if the adjudication would have been admissible if an adult offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When may a party impeach using extrinsic evidence to prove specific instances of conduct?

A

A party may not use extrinsic evidence to prove specific instances of conduct to attack or support a witness’s character for truthfulness, but the court may allow a party to cross-examine on specific instances probative of the character for truthfulness or untruthfulness of the witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When may a party attack or support a witness’s ability to observe and recall?

A

Any party, including the party calling the witness, may at any time attack or support a witness’s ability to observe, remember, or relate accurately, including through the witness who testifies to the recollection or through other witnesses who have personal knowledge of the first witness’s ability to observe, remember, and relate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

May a party impeach a hearsay declarant?

A

When the court admits an out-of-court statement either as outside the hearsay definition or within a hearsay exception, the party opposing the statement may attack the absent declarant’s credibility as if the declarant were testifying and may call the declarant as a witness and examine the declarant as if on cross-examination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When may parties contradict or rehabilitate witnesses?

A

Parties may freely contradict witnesses, including witnesses whom they call, with other evidence, but a party may bolster and rehabilitate a witness’s credibility only after an attack on the witness’s credibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A party may examine a witness about a prior inconsistent statement without showing the statement but, if asked, ______________, with the statement admissible only if ___________________.

A

must show the opposing party’s attorney

the witness has a chance to explain or deny it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Any party, including the party calling the witness, may at any time show the ______ or interest of a witness to impeach the witness’s _________.

A

bias

veracity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Criminal convictions are admissible only to attack the witness’s character for truthfulness if the conviction was punishable by imprisonment ____________ or involved ________. If the witness is a criminal defendant, then the court may admit the conviction only if _________ outweighs its __________. _______________, then the court may admit the conviction only if _______________ outweighs its _______________.

A

for more than one year

dishonesty

its probative value

prejudicial effect

If the conviction and release are more than ten years old

its probative value substantially

prejudicial effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A conviction is admissible if still on appeal ______________________.

A

unless the witness received a pardon or equivalent rehabilitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Juvenile adjudications are admissible _________ to attack a witness other than the defendant and only if the adjudication _________________.

A

only in criminal cases

would have been admissible if an adult offense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A party may not use extrinsic evidence to prove specific instances of conduct to attack or support witness character for truthfulness, but the court may allow a party to ___________ on____________ probative of _________________.

A

cross-examine

specific instances

the character for truthfulness or untruthfulness of the witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Any party, including the party calling the witness, may at any time attack or support a witness’s ability to observe, remember, or relate accurately, including through the witness who testifies to the recollection or through___________ who have personal knowledge of ______________.

A

other witnesses

the first witness’s ability to observe, remember, and relate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When the court admits an out-of-court statement either as outside the hearsay definition or within a hearsay exception, the party opposing the statement may ________________ as if the declarant were testifying.

A

attack the absent declarant’s credibility

17
Q

Parties may freely contradict witnesses, ___________, but a party may only rehabilitate a witness’s credibility after an ________________________.

A

including witnesses whom they call, with other evidence

attack on the witness’s credibility.