Hearsay Exclusions Flashcards

1
Q

When may one cross-examine on a prior inconsistent statement?

A

When a declarant testifies under cross-examination about a prior inconsistent statement made under oath in a proceeding, then the prior inconsistent statement is not hearsay and is admissible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When may one use a prior consistent statement?

A

A party may use a prior consistent statement to rebut an allegation of a witness’s recent fabrication from improper influence or motive, while under examination to rehabilitate the impeached witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When may one use a prior statement of a party opponent?

A

A party may use a prior out-of-court statement of a party opponent, against the party, when the party made the statement, adopted the statement as true, or authorized another to make it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When may one use a prior statement against a corporate party opponent?

A

A party may use a prior out-of-court statement against a corporate party opponent, when other evidence establishes that the corporate party’s agent or employee made the statement within the scope of agency or employment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When may one use a prior statement of a coconspirator?

A

Coconspirator statements furthering the conspiracy qualify as statements of a party opponent, when other evidence establishes the conspiracy, and so a party may use a prior coconspirator statement against the conspirator.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When a declarant testifies under cross-examination about a prior inconsistent statement ________________, then the prior inconsistent statement is not hearsay and is admissible. The statement would have to be in a deposition, for instance.

A

made under oath in a proceeding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A party may use a prior consistent statement to rebut an allegation of a witness’s recent _______________.

A

fabrication or action from improper influence or motive in testifying.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A party may use a prior out-of-court statement against a party opponent when the party made the statement in an_________ capacity, later manifested that it ____________, or had previously _____________.

A

individual

adopted or believed it to be true

authorized another to make a statement on the subject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A party may use a prior out-of-court statement against a corporate party opponent, _____________________.

A

when the corporate party’s agent or employee made the statement within the scope of agency or employment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Coconspirator statements qualify as statements of a party opponent, _____________________.

A

when they further the conspiracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly