Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Evidence > Witness > Flashcards

Witness Flashcards

1
Q

W - Competency - Gral Rule + exceptions

A

Everyone with:

1) Personal knowledge
2) W/present recollection
3) Ability to communicate

EXCEPT for young children or those prohibtied by state law or court rule

  • state law controls matter
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

W - Competency - Basis for W testimony

A

Under oath on basis of PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE (“fisrt hand”) on the fact.

  • even if “equivocating” - i.e. “I think”, “I recall”
  • Jury qualifies and weights it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

W - Competency - Disqualification Causes (4)

A
  1. Untruthfulness
  2. Lack of observation/perception
  3. Lack of memory/recollection of the events
  4. Uncommunicative or lacks ability to communicate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

W - Competency - Insanity rule

A

Gral Rule: Doesnt per-se disqualify as a W

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

W - Competency - Judge and Juror as W

A
  • Judge: not on trial he is presiding
  • Juror: not on trial he is sitting in
    • Post publication of verdict, juror is allow to testify about extraneous prejudicial info, outside influece, verdict from mistake
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

W - Competency vs Credibility

A
  • Competency: admissibility by JUDGE
  • Credibility: impeachment decided by JURY
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

W - Impeachment - Gral / purpose + standing

A
  • Introduction of E to cast doubt upon W credibility/reliability
  • NOT for the merits of the case itself
  • By either party
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

W - Impeachment - Admissible when…

A
  • IF character of the W has been previously attacked by the other party
  • MP + balance test rule applies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

W - Impeachment - Elements to be showed by E for Impeachment (6)

A
  1. Bias: actual/implied, i.e. personal relation W w/ party, attorney
  2. Mental/sensory perception problem: affecting recitation of event. i.e. hearing loss, bad eyesight
  3. Contradiction of testimony: has to be material
  4. Character and Prior Conduct: if relevant (See rules before)
  5. Prior Convictions: for crimes involving untruthfulness
  6. Inconsistent Statements: w/prior statement to oilice or in preliminary procedure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

W - Impeachment - Collateral Facts Rule

A

Extrinsic E NON-ADMISSIBLE to attack credibility of W’s testimony

  • ADM only if relevant to substantive issue on case
    i. e. W1: “I saw X kill Y. I was wearing red”.
  • W2 could say “X didnt kill Y” bc it contradcits substantive factual issue stated by W1, BUT could not say “W1 was wearing blue”, bc only purpose is to create doubts on W2 credibility and not relate to issue
  • Videotape of murder and it show W1 wearing blue, it can be used bc is relevant to substantive issue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

W - Impeachment - use of E for impeachment for as substantive E

A
  • OK if not excluded
  • If permitted usually jury will give limited instructions to jury to consider for impeachment purposes only
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

W - Impeachment - Evidence on W to attack/support his credibility (3) FRE 608

A
  1. Testimony about reputation in community about his truthfulness or untruthfulness
  2. Opinion as to his character
  3. Showing of Specific Instances of conduct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

W - Impeachment - Evidence on W to attack/support his credibility - Reputation /by whom, when

A
  • Of neutral/generalzied ocmmunity
  • Only as rebutal of previous claim of untruthfulness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

W - Impeachment - Evidence on W to attack/support his credibility - Showing of specific instances of conduct / when, content

A
  • Not of previous convicition of crime (special rules)
  • Only by cross-examination of W - NOT by extrinsic E such as calling W to to testify on unrelated issue.
  • Potentially about other W’s actions (also by cross-exam)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

W - Impeachment - Evidence on W to attack/support his credibility - Showing of CONVICTION OF CRIME / Grounds for ADM (2)

A
  1. Felony w/punishment of death or more than 1 year in prison
  2. Crime involving dishonesty (fraud, theft, etc) or false statement regardless of punishment.

NOT for misdemeanors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

W - Impeachment - E of PRIOR CONVICTION- Rule for Accused as W

A

Use of this E only if MP + balance test where probative value outweights prejudice

17
Q

W - Impeachment - E of PRIOR CONVICTION- Time Limit Rule / gral rule, eception

A

Conviction of felony/dishonest crime if conviction or priosn release over 10 years ago (the latest of both)

  • EXCEPT: on interest of justice + courts believe prboative value outweights prejudicial effects
18
Q

W - Impeachment - E of PRIOR CONVICTION- Rules on Pardon, annulment, certificate of rehabilitation

A

Bars admission of prior conviction E IF:

  • no subsequent felony
  • Pardon is based on findings of innocence
19
Q

W - Impeachment - E of PRIOR CONVICTION- Rule for Juvenile Adjudications / rule for civil-criminal

A
  • Criminal case NOT ADMISSIBLE against D
  • Civil and criminal case ADMISSIBLE admisible against W IF similar condiction to adult convicition + necessary to determine issue of guit or innocence
20
Q

W - Impeachment - E of RELIGIOUS BELIEFS- Rule

A

INADMISSIBLE for impeachment

  • ok for other narrower purposes (i.e. bias, personal interest)
21
Q

W - Impeachment - E of PRIOR W’s STATEMENTS- Rule

A

ADMISSIBLE if it is incosnitentor creates doubt regarding current testimony

  • not for other purposes - Collateral Fact Rule applies
22
Q

W - Testimony - Gral Rule of admission / opinion on hwta nd on what not, purpose

A
  • As opinion of issue of fact
  • Provides help to jury to decide on issue that is beyond their normal knowledge
  • Can not be opinion on legal conclusion
23
Q

W- Interrogation - Formal Procedure Gral

A
  • Manner and order is discretional of court
  • 1 Q at the time
24
Q

W- Interrogation - Leading Questions Rules

A

Gral Rule: Not in direct examination unless necessary to develop testimony (very limited), OK in cross examination

EXCEPTION: Ok in direct examination when:

  1. Hostile W
  2. W of the adverse party
  3. Adverse party

(assumption these W will not want to be led)

25
Q

W- Interrogation - Writing (or other) to refresh memory /when and how

A
  • For friendly W pre or during testimony
  • Not read from document but testify from memory
  • If photo/doc no admission necessary but needs to be available for adversay and allow for cross examination on it.
  • Can later be introduced into E (normal admissible reqs)
  • Any privilege in the doc is waived
26
Q

W - Interrogation - Use of Prior Statement by W / Admissibility Rule

A

1) If introduced to show inconsistency with testimony it must:
- Give chance to W to deny or explain
- Opposing councel to cross examin W
2) If not for inconsistency purposes need only to show to other counsel upon request

27
Q

W- Interrogation - By Court sua ponte or bc of request

A

Judge cannot show any bias or partiallity

28
Q

W- Interrogation - Exclusion of W

A
  • By request from party
  • Removed from proceeding
  • To avoid him from hearing other W and framing his testimony in something different from his own personal knowledge
  • doesnt usually proceed for parties as W
29
Q

W - Types of testimony (2)

A
  1. Opinion testimony by lay witness
  2. Expert testimony
30
Q

W - Opinion testimony - Gral /by whom, court involvement

A
  • By law witness
  • Court discretion to admit, if it meets criteria
31
Q

W - Opinion testimony - Admissibility Criteria (3)

A
  1. Rationally based on personal knowledge
  2. Helpful for the jury to understand fact in issue
  3. Not within expert W testimony scope
32
Q

W - Expert Testimony - Gral / when, objection,

A
  • When issue requires scientifc/technical/specifci knowledge help for the jury to understand E or issue at fact
  • Court by request tor sua ponte can enter order to show necessity of expert
  • Party objecting willusually present motion in limine to exclude prior to trial
  • Judge with great discretion
33
Q

W - Expert Testimony - Expert Qualifications SKEET

A
  • Judge to assess discretionally and justification to compensation of expert
  • Skills
  • Knowledge
  • Experienec
  • Education
  • Training

NO LICENSE OR DEGREE NECESSARY

34
Q

W - Expert Testimony - Reliability - Gral

A
  • judge as “gate keeper” under FRE
  • Can exclude testimony that could ptentially affect jury’s even/fair consideration of fact
  • Application to SRA Daubert Reliability Conditions
35
Q

W - Expert Testimony - Reliability - Daubert Reliable Conditions SRA

A
  1. Sufficient facts to base testimony must exist and be presented
  2. Reliable pples and technichs are applied - scientifically sound that are “generally accepted” in the community (not majority per se, but more than educated guess)
  3. Applied reliably and reasonably to the facts at issue.
36
Q

W - Expert Testimony - Basis for opinion (3) / charactersitics and sources

A
  • Based on personal perception and provided facts
  • Reasonable and more than speculation
  1. On facts known, as data or facts provided at or before hearing
  2. Facts dont need to be admissible E AS LONG as they the type an expert would reasoanbly rely
  3. If based on inadmissible facts, they cannot be disclosed to jury
37
Q

W - Expert Testimony - Basis of testimony - Disclosure / gral rule

A

Gral Rule: NO DISCLOSURE

UNLESS:

  • required by judge
  • required in cross examination
38
Q

W - Expert Testimony - Basis of testimony - Disclosure / Rule for Hearsay

A

If facts/data to be disclosed and is hearsay,

  • Judge can give limiting instruction or exclude the E

Evidence (9 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions