General matters under FRE Flashcards
E - Applicable Law + exceptions (3)
Federal rules of E - Exceptions (3): 1) preliminary question of fact to determine admissibility 2) Grand jury proceeds 3) Miscellaneous proceeding : i.e. extradition, inmigration, etc
E- Gral Approach for Courts
Discretion - FRE as guidelines / apply common sense
E- Types of notices (3) - as knowledge of a fact
- Judicial
- Discretionary
- Mandatory
E- Types of notices - Judicial / 2 types of facts permitted at any time of procedure
- Grlly known bu public at large and non-reasonable to dispute them (“Seattle is in WA”)
- Capable of accurate and ready determination with review of source (look for word in dictionary)
E- Types of notices - Judicial / Effects on civ/criminal
- Civil: fact is established as conclusive for jury
- Criminal: prosecutor deemed to have satisfied burden of proof (still has burden to persuade
E- Types of notices - Discretionary / subjects (4) (by request or sua ponte)
- Foregin Law
- Regs of private agencie
- Municipal Ordinances
- Local geographic matter
E- Types of notices - Mandatory / when, what (2)
- Only by request
- For:
1) federal/state law
2) Indisputable facts and scientific provisions
E- Evidentiary Rulings - Requirements for Objections (3) (party must prove that)
- Substantial right was affected
- Objection/motion to strike timely submitted (before E admitted or soon thereafter) and w/specific details UNLESS is obvious facts or plain error
- Objection presented to preserve issue for later challenge/appeal
E- Evidentiary Rulings - Grounds for appeal (2)
- Would create difference in outcome
- Constitutional violation involved
E - General rule on burden of proof and standards
- Proponents with burden
- “Preponderance of E” aka “more probabel than not” (execeptionally “clear and convicing” and “reasonable doubt for criminal”)
E- Court/Jury roles regarding E
- Court: decides on admisibility of facts
- Jury: decides on weight and credibility of E
E- Rule on D testifying on criminal preliminary matter
No 5th ammendment waiver presummed / no “self incrimination”
E - Cross Examination Limitation
When in criminal case prohibtion to cross examin on other matters
E - “Limited Admissibility” Rule
- Court allowed to give “limiting instruction” to jury to consider E only for the stated permissible purpose
- WHen court allows E againt one party for 1 purpose it can allow or limit to another for a different purpose
E - Types of Burden of proof (2)
- Of production
- Of persuassion