Wills Flashcards
1.1.1 EXECUTION OF WILLS
- To make a valid will:
- To make a valid will:
i. the testator must have mental capacity
ii. intention to make a will
iii. The will must also be duly executed in accordance with s9 Wills Act 1837.
1.1.2 EXECUTION OF WILLS
iv. A testator is presumed to have the necessary mental capacity to make a will…
…unless someone challenging the validity of the will can point to a lack of capacity.
1.1.3 EXECUTION OF WILLS
v. A testator must have understood…
a) The nature of their act
(That they were making a will)
b) The extent of their property
c) Who a testator would normally give gifts to
NB. A court may deem a testator to have acted with capacity if the testator did not have adequate mental capacity at the date of executing the will, but had sufficient capacity when giving instructions to the drafter.
1.1.4 EXECUTION OF WILLS
vi. Suspicious circumstances…
If there were suspicious circumstances*:
the gift will fail
unless evidence of the testator’s knowledge and approval of the gift is offered by the person putting forward the will:
*e.g. where the drafter benefits from the will.
1.1.5 EXECUTION OF WILLS
vi. If a testator wants to give the solicitor a substantial gift in their will…
…the solicitor should refuse to draft the will including the legacy unless the testator has taken independent advice.
1.2.1 EXECUTION OF WILLS
If a will is made as a consequence of force, fear, fraud or undue influence:
It is
i. not regarded as the act of the testator
and
ii. not admitted to probate.
1.2.2 EXECUTION OF WILLS
ii. A will issued as a result of force or fear of injury
a) Is issued under duress
1.2.3 EXECUTION OF WILLS
iii. Undue influence
a) Arises when something:
overpowers the testator’s volition;
it must be:
beyond mere persuasion.
1.3.1 EXECUTION OF WILLS
iii. The will must also be duly executed in accordance with s9 Wills Act 1837.
a) in writing, and signed by the testator, or by some other person in his presence and by his direction; and
b) it appears that the testator intended by his signature to give effect to the will; and
c) the signature is made in the presence of 2 or more witnesses present at the same time; and
d) each witness
1. either attests and signs the will;
2. or acknowledges his signature,
e) in the presence of the testator
(but not necessarily in the presence of any other witness),
1.3.2 EXECUTION OF WILLS
i. Signed by the testator:
a) A mark intended as a signature may be sufficient e.g. an unfinished signature, thumbprint, or signature stamp.
b) Signatures are usually at the end of the will but may be included in the body of the will.
c) A witness may sign for the testator if directed by the testator to do so
1.3.3 EXECUTION OF WILLS
ii. Signed by the testator in the presence of two or more witnesses
a) The witnesses do not need to see the contents of the will or even be told that they are witnessing a will
1.3.4 EXECUTION OF WILLS
iii. Signed by each witness in the presence of the testator
(but not necessarily in the presence of the other witness)
How do you prove?
a) An attestation clause should be included to confirm the above requirements i.e.
1. “signed by the testator in our presence and then by us in his”
b) If an attestation clause is not included, proof must be offered that these requirements were met.
= affidavit of due execution?
1.4.1 EXECUTION OF WILLS
A will may identify another document that effectively becomes part of the will.
i. Such a document must exist at the date of the will and be referred to in the will as so existing, otherwise it cannot be incorporated.
ii. A future intention to make a list, schedule or memorandum does not suffice.
2.1.1 ALTERATION, AMENDMENT AND REVOCATION OF WILLS
- A will can only be amended after it’s executed if:
i. The change is signed and witnessed in the same manner in which the entire will is witnessed.
ii. Generally unattested alterations are presumed to have been made after execution unless the the ‘alteration’ was just filling in a blank e.g. “I, Terry Testator, being of sound mind…”
iii. A will can be amended or partially revoked by codicil
i. A separate document which refers to the will and is executed like a will
ii. (more popular when wills were long handwritten documents).
2.2.1 ALTERATION, AMENDMENT AND REVOCATION OF WILLS
- When can a will be revoked?
at any time before the testator’s death.
2.2.2 ALTERATION, AMENDMENT AND REVOCATION OF WILLS
i. If a testator marries after executing a will…
the will is automatically revoked
unless it appears from the will that, when it was made, the testator was expecting to marry a particular person
2.2.3 ALTERATION, AMENDMENT AND REVOCATION OF WILLS
ii. If a testator divorces their spouse after executing a will…
…the law treats the former spouse as having died on the date of the divorce
iii. Gifts to the former spouse are revoked, but the remainder of the will is valid
2.2.4 ALTERATION, AMENDMENT AND REVOCATION OF WILLS
iv. Destruction of a will by burning, tearing, or otherwise destroying the document…
revokes the will
i. The destruction must be by the testator or someone acting at the testator’s direction and in their presence
ii. The testator must have the intention to revoke at the time of destruction
2.2.5 ALTERATION, AMENDMENT AND REVOCATION OF WILLS
v. If a will is found mutilated after the testator’s death…
i. It will be presumed to have been mutilated by the testator
ii. with the intention to revoke,
iii. unless there is evidence to the contrary.
2.2.6 ALTERATION, AMENDMENT AND REVOCATION OF WILLS
vi. A destroyed will might be given effect if it’s proved that its destruction was contingent on a future event that didn’t occur
e.g. testator destroyed the old will intending to write a new one, but didn’t get around to it).
= the doctrine of dependent relative revocation…
= its revocation was dependent on related event which didn’t happen.
2.2.7 ALTERATION, AMENDMENT AND REVOCATION OF WILLS
vii. A new will revokes an earlier will:
i. To the extent that it is inconsistent with the earlier will.
2.3.1 ALTERATION, AMENDMENT AND REVOCATION OF WILLS
3. If a testator has written a mutual will
(wills written by 2 people with clauses conferring reciprocal benefits):
i. The second to die can technically revoke their will.
ii. However, a constructive trust will be placed upon the estate in favour of any beneficiaries harmed by the changes to order a transfer to that person.
3.1.1 INTERPRETATION OF WILLS
- General Rule of when gifts in wills are given…
i. Gifts given in wills are treated as if they were given at the moment of death.
(unless the will shows a contrary intention).
ii. Collective gifts passes what is in the collection at the date of death
e.g. all of the jewellery owned at the date of death.
iii. The word ’my’ in an individual object, can indicate an intention only to give the specific object owned at the date of the will.
e.g. my car = my BMW at the date of the will, not my Mercedes at date of death.
3.2.1 INTERPRETATION OF WILLS
- 4 categories of gift:
i. A specific legacy
= specific item.
ii. A general legacy
= a BMW 3-series (even if not in the estate)
iii. A pecuniary legacy
= cash
iv. A residuary legacy
= A gift of everything that’s left in the deceased’s estate after giving the specific, general and pecuniary legacies, and paying all expenses of administering the estate.
3.3.1 INTERPRETATION OF WILLS
- If a beneficiary dies before the testator dies…
…the gift will fail (lapse)
and fall in to the residue
(Unless the testator included a substitution clause to name an alternative beneficiary)
3.3.3 INTERPRETATION OF WILLS
ii. If the residuary gift lapses…
e.g. “I leave the residue of my estate to my good friend Edna” but Edna dies before the testator
…the residuary will pass through the laws of intestacy
3.3.4 INTERPRETATION OF WILLS
iii. If 2 people (such as the testator and the beneficiary) die at the same time and it’s impossible to tell who dies first…
The older is deemed to have died first / the younger person is deemed to have survived the elder
the law of commorientes
3.3.5 INTERPRETATION OF WILLS
iv. If the gift was made to issue of the testator and that beneficiary dies before the testator but leaves living issue…
the gift DOES NOT LAPSE and will go to the living issue:
3.4.1 INTERPRETATION OF WILLS
- If a will leaves a gift for a witness…
i. the will is valid
but the gift to the witness fails
ii. unless there are 2 other witnesses who are not beneficiaries:
3.5.1 INTERPRETATION OF WILLS
- A gift in a will to someone’s children:
(Who is / isn’t included within “children”?)
i. INCLUDES the person’s legitimate, illegitimate and adopted children
ii. DOES NOT INCLUDE stepchildren i.e. children of testator’s spouse who were not adopted by testator.
Intestacy Order
1. Spouse + No issue
= Spouse entitled to all decadent’s property
2. Spouse + Issue
= spouse entitled to tangibles + £270k + 50% of decadents remaining property, children split the rest
3. No spouse + Issue
= to decandent’s children
decedent’s parents
4. Decadent’s brothers / sisters of half blood
5. Decadent’s brothers / sisters of full blood
6. Grandparents
7. Uncles & aunts
8. Crown