Dispute Resolution Flashcards
- METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
1.1a What are the 4 primary processes for resolving disputes
- Litigation
- Negotiation
- Mediation
- Arbitration
- METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
1.1a
Explain the characteristics of LITIGATION which make it an appropriate mechanism to resolve a dispute.
LITIGATION
Governed by the Civil Procedure Rules
o expensive
o time consuming
o should be a last resort
1. involuntary
2. legally binding judgement which can be enforced against other party
3. Decision maker may not have subject matter expertise
4. Formal procedure
5. Strict rules of evidence
(ws / experts)
6. Outcome imposed
7. Public
.
- METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
1.1b
Explain the characteristics of NEGOTIATION which make it an appropriate mechanism to resolve a dispute.
NEGOTIATION
o Correspondence, meetings or telephone calls to try to negotiate a settlement
o can happen at any time pre or post litigation
o Can be WP = they cannot be relied on by the other party / referred to in court
o Enables parties to explore opportunities to resolve without concern it will be used against them.
- METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
1.1C
Explain the characteristics of MEDIATION which make it an appropriate mechanism to resolve a dispute.
MEDIATION
o most common form of ADR
1. Voluntary process
2. Agreement enforceable by contract
3. Chosen 3rd party with subject matter expertise
4. Informal procedure
5. Unbounded presentation of evidence
(can bring up hurt feelings, distrust etc.)
6. Mediator does not impose a solution, but helps the parties find their own solution
7. Private
Advantages:
Cost, speed, privacy, preserve business relationship, commercial reality
Disadvantages:
Limited disclosure, enforcement not automatic
- METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
1.1d
Explain the characteristics of ARBITRATION which make it an appropriate mechanism to resolve a dispute.
ARBITRATION
o In arbitration the arbitrator resolves the dispute
1. Often contractual requirement
2. Final award binding
3. Specialist arbiter
4. Formal procedure
5. Strict rules of evidence
(statements of case, written submissions, docs)
6. Outcome imposed
7. Private
Advantages:
Cost, speed, privacy, preserve business relationship, commercial reality
Disadvantages:
Limited disclosure, some remedies not available.
- METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
1.2 What is Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Broad label given to methods of resolving disputes other than through litigation
o Negotiation
o Mediation
o Arbitration
Parties must consider ADR at all stages.
- METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
1.4 PAP requires the parties to consider a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) to assist with settlement
o Litigation should be a last resort.
o the parties may be required by the court to provide evidence that ADR has been considered
- METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
1.5 Failure to engage in ADR
- A solicitor should discuss with the client the availability of ADR.
- A party’s silence or a refusal to participate in ADR:
o might be considered unreasonable by the court and
o could lead to the court ordering that party to pay costs sanctions UNLESS THEY CAN JUSTIFY TO THE COURT.
2.0 SRA
1. OVERVIEW OF CIVIL LITIGATION
- Preliminary Considerations
- Commencement of Action
- Interim Matters
- Trial
- Post-Trial
2.0 SRA
2. Preliminary considerations:
i. Can a claim be brought at all?
ii. Who are the parties?
iii. Does D have means to pay?
iv. merits of the case?
v. Causes of Action
vi. What steps must be taken before proceedings issued?
- PRE-ACTION CONSIDERATIONS
2.1-2
What is a Limitation Period?
o Limitation Act 1980 sets the strict time limits for bringing actions of the various classes.
o if these are missed the claim will be statute barred
= D will have a technical defence to the claim.
- PRE-ACTION CONSIDERATIONS
2.3-4
Limitation Period in Contract & Tort
o CONTRACT = 6 YEARS
from date of breach of contract
NB. A shorter limitation in a construction contract to ‘make good defects’ does not prevent simple contract action in statutory 6-year period
o GENERAL TORT = 6 YEARS
from date damage occurred
o PI TORT = 3 YEARS
from date harm occurred
o LATENT DEFECTS / DAMAGE
Tort of Negligence
For faults in design, materials, or workmanship existing but not apparent when work completed on the later of:
o 6 YEARS
from accrual of the action and
o 3 YEARS
from date claimant knew / reasonably ought to have known
o 15 YEARS LONGSTOP
o MINORS = From 18 years of age
If C is a minor = limitation period commences on 18th birthday
o FRAUD OR CONCEALMENT
Limitation periods do not commence until date of knowledge.
o EXTENSION
Court has discretion to extend limitation period but will only do so in exceptional cirucmstances.
- PRE-ACTION CONSIDERATIONS
2.4B
* 4 Fundamentals of Limitation Periods in Contract and Tort
1. Primary Limitation
o CONTRACT = 6 YEARS
from date of breach of contract
o GENERAL TORT = 6 YEARS
from date damage occurred
2. Secondary Limitation
o TORT based on negligence =
3-years from date of knowledge
o LONGSTOP - up to 15 years
3. Personal Injury
3 years from date of harm
4. Postponement
Limitation periods for fraud or concealment do not commence until date of knowledge.
- PRE-ACTION CONSIDERATIONS
- 2.5 - Time stops running for limitation period purposes when…
the claimant delivers the properly completed claim form to the court with a request to issue proceedings, together with the correct fee.
- PRE-ACTION CONSIDERATIONS
- 2.6 - If a claim is issued before expiry of the limitation period…
o it may be possible to alter the name of the defendant if D correctly identified but mistakenly named.
o If a new defendant is named after expiry of limitation period + D raises the limitation defence = C can ask the court to disapply the limitation period (which is at the court’s discretion).
2.0 SRA
2. Preliminary considerations:
ii. Who are the parties?
iii. Does D have means to pay?
i. Who is the defendant?
ii. Where is the defendant?
iii. In what capacity should D be sued?
individual, sole trader, partnership, LLP, LTD
iv. Is D worth suing?
conduct company search, bankruptcy search
2.0 SRA
2. Preliminary considerations:
iv. Merits of the case
i. Consider merits of the case
= can client achieve satisfactory solution at a reasonable cost?
2.0 SRA
2. Preliminary considerations:
v. Causes of Action
1. summary
= Legal basis of the claim i.e.:
1. CONTRACT
i. Existence of contract
ii. Express Terms
iii. Implied Terms
SGA, SGSA, CRA
iv. Breach of Terms
v. Consequence of breach
vi. Damage and Loss
Resulting in recoverable loss
in the alternative consider:
2. TORT
i. Negligence
ii. Statute
iii. Nuisance
2.0 SRA
2. Preliminary considerations:
v. Causes of Action
2. Contract
= Legal basis of the claim i.e.:
1. CONTRACT
i. EXPRESS TERMS - in the contract, or
ii. IMPLIED TERMS
Sale of Goods Act = B2B
- satisfactory quality
- fit for purpose
Sale of Goods & Services = B2B
- right to goods
- free from charge / encumbrance
- correspond with descriptions / samples
- satisfactory quality
- fit for purpose
- carry out service with reasonable care and skill.
Consumer Rights Act = B2C
- as above
To put C in position they would have been if contract had been properly performed:
2.0 SRA
2. Preliminary considerations:
v. Causes of Action
3. Tort
2. TORT
in the alternative consider:
i. Negligence / Statute
- (statutory) DOC
- Breach of DOC
- Breach caused damage/loss
iii. Nuisance
- Use of land
- is unreasonably interfered with
- by other landowner
e.g. noise, tree roots, water flooding
To put C in position they would have been had negligent act not occurred.
- PRE-ACTION CONSIDERATIONS
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOLS AND PRE-ACTION APPLICATIONS
3.1-3
Explain the Pre-action protocols
3.1 - Pre-action protocols set out the steps that each party should take before commencing legal proceedings
3.2 - There are a number of dispute-specific protocols.
3.3. If no specific protocol applies, courts expect litigants to follow the guidelines set out in the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols
(the ‘Practice Direction’)
- PRE-ACTION CONSIDERATIONS
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOLS AND PRE-ACTION APPLICATIONS
3.3
Explain the Practice Direction
* purpose of pre-action protocols
* principles
* key steps
Purpose
o encourage exchange of information so that the parties may be able to settle cases without need for litigation.
o to enable proceedings to run to the court’s timetable if litigation does become necessary.
Principles
o Litigation should be a last resort
Key steps
1. C sends Letter Before Claim including:
o concise details of the claim
o include key documents
2. D sends Letter of Response:
o within 14 days for straightforward claim
o up to 3 months for a complex claim
o indicate if they accept, or not, reasons, or counterclaim
o include key documents
3. **Claimant replies **+ parties should consider:
o ADR
o using a single joint expert
4. Stocktake
o consider whether litigation can be avoided
o narrow issues in dispute
- PRE-ACTION CONSIDERATIONS
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOLS AND PRE-ACTION APPLICATIONS
3.4
Explain the Personal Injury Protocol:
The claimant’s letter of claim should include:
o Summary of the facts
o Impact of C’s injuries on daily life
o Hospital attended + ref number, and
o Indication of financial losses
The defendant must respond within 21 days
o The response may indicate that the D wishes to investigate, in which case they have 3-months to admit or deny the claim
o If the defendant does not respond within 21 days the claimant can issue proceedings
- PRE-ACTION CONSIDERATIONS
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOLS AND PRE-ACTION APPLICATIONS
3.5
What are the consequences if a party fails to follow the relevant protocol or the Practice Direction?
o Stay of proceedings to allow the Practice Direction to be complied with
o Ordering non-compliant party to pay the costs (or part of the costs) of the other party
o If non-compliant party is the claimant, restricting interest on the claim.
o if a party doesn’t follow the applicable pre-action protocol in whole or in part:
- they may be penalised in the costs that they are ordered to pay / can recover
- if they are ordered to pay damages, they may have to pay interest at a higher rate.