Wills Flashcards
Conditions for a testator to be able to make a will
Age: Over 18, unless a privileged will for soldiers and marines (in service), may also be written or oral
Mentally capable: The test follow from common law Banks v Goodfellow: The testator must have understood
(i) the nature of his act and its broad effects, (ii) the extent of his property, and
(iii) the moral claims to which he ought to give effect.
Parker v Felgate/Perrins v Holland: the testator will be presumed to have mental capacity if
(i) the testator had such capacity at the time of giving instructions to the solicitor for preparing the will,
(ii) the will was prepared according to the instructions, and (iii) the testator understood that he was executing the will for which he gave instructions, although he did not have full capacity at the time of the execution.
An individual can have testamentary capacity despite suffering from mild to moderate dementia. In Hardwood v Barker, the testamentation of the whole estate to a man’s wife was found invalid, as he was not sufficiently aware of the existence of his own family.
Capacity will NOT be presumed if the testator had long-time serious mental illness.
Capacity is not tried unless challenged and presumed to be in place if the will is duly executed. Burden of proof is on the challenger.
The ‘Golden rule’: not legally binding, but advised to obtain a medical report from a medical practitioner if in doubt.
Testator knows and approves content of the will at the time of execution (or when the solicitor was instructed c.f. Exception above)
Closely connected with mental capacity. If the testator possesses mental capacity he is presumed to have knowledge and approval as well.
Lack of knowledge must relate to the preparation and execution of the will e.g. the testator was under undue influence, blind, the will is signed by another without an attestation clause, suspicious circumstances, or a mistake during preparation of the will.
Undue influence conditions
To impose unlawful pressure on the testator so that the will does not reflect the testator’s true wishes, but rather the one of the influencer. The challenger must prove actual undue influence and the threshold is higher than for a contract or lifetime gift (for these, equitable undue influence is available, where undue influence is presumed based on relationship between giver and receiver). It is legitimate to seek to persuade the testator.
Undue influence may be applied by a third party, in order to benefit someone else (Schomberg v Taylor)
No presumption of undue influence and claims are typically confined to coercion/duress (forced or threatened)
Effect: the will is void and has no effect
Presumption of due execution
Presumption of due execution: if the will includes a correctly drafted attestation clause, there is a presumption that the will has been correctly executed. Presumption still exists if the will does not contain attestation clause, as long as there is no evidence that the will has not been duly executed. Rebuttable if e.g. circumstances vary from what was recorded in the attestation clause, a weaker presumption where the clause is irregular.
Will - formal requirements
- The will must be in writing. Where both pen and pencil is used: pen is presumed written at the time of the will, but pencil is presumed as drafts and not valid unless evidence to the contrary. No requirement to date the will.
- Signed by testator: any mark is ok, but photocopy is not a signature. A photo of the will can be an application for a grant of probate, including an affidavit. The will can be signed by someone on the testator’s behalf and there are no restrictions regarding who this third party can be (can be a witness, sole beneficiary etc) as long as the testator is both physically and mentally present. Attestation clause must be adapted and explain what happened. The signature can be anywhere on the will, but an affidavit might be required if at the beginning.
- Intention: the estator intended to sign the will, as a will. All pages must be connected e.g. in the same room or controlled by the testator during execution. Unexecuted can be part of will (hence admitted to probate with the will) if (i) clearly identified in the will, (ii) already exists at the date of execution or later codicil, (iii) is referred to in the will.
- The testator has capacity (see above)
- Two witnesses: no formal requirement regarding who can witness. An example question where one was minor and one alcoholic. Will is still valid (not void) but not correctly executed due to the alcoholic.
Witnes requirement if testator is signing the will (not just acknowledgning
If the testator is signing the will and not just acknowledging: the witnesses must be aware that the testator is writing (do not have to see what), and each witness must sign the will in presence of the testator, but not necessarily in the presence of the other witness.
Witness requirement if testator is just acknowledging signature
If the testator or witnesses is acknowledging (a small nodd or explanation by a witness who saw the actual signature is e.g. enough): the testator must acknowledge his previously written signature to the witnesses. The witnesses must be able to see the signature, if they wish (not met if signatures are covered by a page which could be uncovered if asked for it). The testator and both witnesses must be present when the testator signs and acknowledges the will, but the witnesses do not have to sign or acknowledge their signature in the presence of each other. No attestation is necessary. Witnesses do not need to know that they are signing a will.
Who can witness wills
anyone. can be under 18 and under influence of alcohol and the will is still valid.
A beneficiary/married partner of any beneficiary can witness, but beneficiaries and their married partners will then lose their benefit under the will. The will is still valid.
Gift is likely saved if there are two other witnesses.
Statutory will def
Statutory will: made by the court for people who lack capacity. Must be sealed by the court. Likely to be made if the testator’s circumstances were altered in a major way, property a deems, changes in relationships to beneficiaries, doubts about validity, high value assets.
Foreign will def
Foreign wills: valid if it conforms to the law of the jurisdictions where it was executed, the testator has domiciled or habitually resident or which the testator was a national.
Mutual will def
Mutual wills: (i) two or more people executes pursuant to an agreement, (ii) parties agree that the surviving party shall not alter their will, (iii) first party dies. Agreement can be oral or in writing, but must be written for disposition of land
FOrmalities changing wills
If you make any changes to your will you must follow the same signing and witnessing process. UK GOV: If you cannot meet with your witnesses in person, you can watch each other sign your will remotely (for example by video conferencing). You can only sign remotely in England or Wales.
Letter of wish def
Letter of wishes: not legally binding but may accompany will to e.g. explain. No witnesses required.
Alterations before the will is executed
Alterations before the will is executed: if signed, it has the presumption that it was made prior to execution. Rebuttable by external evidence, such as affidavit from drafter or witnesses.
If unsigned, the presumption is that it was made after execution and therefore invalid. Pen superseeds pencil.
Codicil - formal requirements
Same formal requirements as wills. If codicil amends will, the date of the codicil and not will will apply. E.g. youngest son will be at the time of the codicil and not the will.
Post death changes to will
Post death changes:
Disclaimer: a beneficiary can disclaim their inheritance either orally or in writing to a personal representative. The estate mistreated as if the beneficiary predeceased the deceased.
Variation: beneficiary can choose who gets their share or part of it
Doctrine of conditional revocation/dependent relative revocation of wills
Doctrine of conditional revocation/dependent relative revocation: alterations to will made directly or indirectly conditional of the original gift failing.
Re Itter: a woman amended sums in will with paper strips with new numbers. The court found that the paper strips did not revoke the original wording (was not crossed out) but intended to make the amendment of the old number conditional on the new number being valid. The amendment was not duly executed and the original numbers were admitted to probate
Effect of unattested alterations made after execution
Alternation after the will is executed: void unless either (i) signed by testator and at least two witnesses or (ii) the entire will, including the alterations is re-executed or confirmed by codicil (referring to the alterations)
Effect of unattested alterations made after execution where the original wording is apparent: the alteration is ignored and the original wording is admitted to probate.
Effect of unattested alterations made after execution where the original wording is no longer apparent: the wording is revoked and will be admitted to probate with a blank space where the obliteration was. Evidence (such as copy of will) is allowed to show that the testator did not intend to revoke the original wording or simply revoke it conditionally (often by substituting a figure with a higher figure). The court could allow substituted wording if the new gift is successful, if not the original wording will stand
What happen if a revoked will is not replaced
Revoked wills could be replaced by a copy of the revoked will, if a new will has not been made and original the will was revoked conditional on a new will.
Methods for revokation of will
methods of revocation
Testator must have capacity and no mutual will is in the way of revocation. A will is never revoked based on an assumption that the testator’s circumstances have changed. A revoked will can be revived by the same formalities as a regular will (made at the time of re-execution).
Revocation by destruction
Revocation by destruction
Act of destruction: Burned, torn or destroyed, or otherwise destroying the will. Requires that the entirety of the essence of the will, not just part of it, is revoked. Crossing out parts and writing “these are revoked” is not enough. If only an essential part is destroyed e.g. all signatures are cut out or scratched by pen, the court could rule that the will is revoked. +
Intent to revoke: Requires intent to destroy by the testator and that the destruction is in the presence by the testator AND by his direction, or at the hand of the testator. The testator must complete all he intends to destroy e.g. a will is note revoked if the testator intends to burn the whole will, but solely burns a section. Intent will not be fulfilled if the testator lacked capacity when the will was destroyed. Not revoked if the testator mistakenly thought it was replaced by a new will (doctrine of dependent relative revocation). E.g. a testator burnt his will thinking how wolfe would inherit all under intestacy, the court found that the revocation was conditional and held the will to be valid. OBS an intent to make a new will is not enough.
If only a less significant part of the will is destroyed, the court will likely just find the will partially revoked.
A will that was last known to be in the testator’s possessions but that cannot be found, is presumed destroyed with intent and revoked. A copy found in the deceased possessions was in Re Webb enough to prove to probate when the original could not be found.
Revocation by later will or codicil
Revocation by later will or codicil:
express or implied, in whole or in part.
Express revocation is clearer and could be limited to certain clauses. “This is the last will and testament of x” is not clear enough to revoke a previous will.
Revocation can be implied where a later will is inconsistent with provisions of the earlier document.
Revocation takes effect on execution - hence the earlier will is revoked even if the later one is lost, destroyed etc.
If subsequent will is void, e.g. drawn under undue influence, the previous will is not revoked.
Revocation by written intention to revoke
Revocation by written intention to revoke
A person with capacity expressed in writing that a will is to be revoked + complies with formalities (written doc is signed and witnesses x2) and not made under undue influence, the will is revoked.
Presumption when a gift is made - wills
Gifts are regarded as taking effect immediately before the testator’s death, rather than the date of the will, unless otherwise follows from the will or the gift is to a specific beneficiary. A gift of real property is presumed to include all interests of the testator, both equitable and legal.
Specific gift: specific property e.g. land. Subject to ademption and fails if the property is no longer part of the estate on the date of the testator’s death
How does marriage and divorce affect wills?
Marriage and civil partnerships revokes any will made prior to marriage. Presentable by making a will in contemplation of the marriage, but must be specific and preferably naming the spouse (general statement is not enough) + must be due in the foreseeable future.
Separation does not affect the will
Divorce partially revokes the will, so that all parts appointing the spouse as executor/trustee are deemed as revoked. Legacy to the spouse will laps and fall into residue. Where the gift is of the residue it will fail and pass under rules of intestacy
Remarriage: automatically revokes will
Voidable marriage revokes the will, but a void marriage does not affect it.
General gift
General Gift: provided out of the testator’s general estate. Not subject to ademption and if the estate does not hold it (e.g. 300 shares in British gas), the executors have to obtain it
If an absolute gift is given to a spouse with an interest to an issue, it is presumed that the gift is absolute notwithstanding the interest to the issue.
Demonstrative legacies
Demonstrative legacies: a general gift, but with a specified designated fund (e.g. 100 to Arne from the BND account). Not subject to ademption, and the executors will have to resort to the rest of the estate for the gift to be made.