Wills Flashcards

1
Q

Revocation by Divorce

A

If a testator is divorced after making a will, all gifts to the former spouse are revoked, and the will takes effect as though the former spouse predeceased the testator.

In most states, a bequest to former spouse’s relatives remains in full force regardless of the relationship of the parties. Under the Uniform Probate Code, however, a divorce revokes bequests not only to the former spouse but also to the relatives of former spouses.

ExamTip: This is a revocation by operation of law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ademption

A

Under the common law identity theory, a specific gift is adeemed if it cannot be identified at the time of the testator’s death or the testator does not own it at the time of death. This can occur when the testator makes a specific gift, but the property is later destroyed or sold before their death. The ademption doctrine is an objective test that does not take into account the testator’s probable intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Intestacy: Rules of Distribution of Shares

A
  1. Strict Per Stirpes: Under the common law strict per stirpes approach, the estate is divided by the number of members in the first generation of children who are either alive or survived by descendants. Each member who is alive takes their share, and the shares of the deceased members drop to the next generation. This process is repeated for the next generations until every share is taken.
  2. Per Capita With Representation (majority): The estate is divided equally among the living and deceased at the first generation that has a living taker.
  3. Per Capita at Each Generation: Under the UPC per capita at each generation approach, the estate is divided at the closest generation to the decedent in which one or more of the descendants are alive (similar to modern per stirpes). However, shares of the deceased descendants on each level are added together and divided equally among all representatives of the deceased descendants in the next generation level (shares are dropped by “pooling” method).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Requirements for a Valid Will

A

(1) Legal Capacity (i.e.,18 years, and of sound mind)
(2) Testamentary Capacity
(3) Testamentary Intent (i.e., present intent to create a will)
(4) Compliance with Formalities of Will Execution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Testamentary Capacity

A

A testator must have the capacity to understand: (1) the nature of their act of executing a will; (2) the nature and extent of their property; (3) the persons who are the natural object of their bounty (family members); and (4) ability to formulate an orderly scheme of disposition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Will Execution Formalities

A

To be valid, a will must (1) be in writing; (2) signed by the testator; and (3) attested to in the testator’s presence by two disinterested witnesses (or notarized).

ExamTip: A will with an interested witness is VALID, but the witness’ share will be ‘purged’. However, if two disinterested witnesses were present, the gift will be valid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Meaning of “Signed in Testator’s Presence”

A

Under the “conscious presence test” (majority rule), a will signed within the range of the testator’s senses is valid.

Under the minority view, a will must be signed within the testator’s line of sight.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Doctrine of Integration

A

A document will be integrated into a will if the testator (1) intended it to be part of the will AND (2) the document was physically present at the will’s execution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Codicils

A

A codicil is an instrument made after a will is executed that modifies, amends, or revokes a will. Codicils must satisfy the same formalities.

A valid codicil republishes the will and can cure any interested witness issues if disinterested witnesses are used.

ExamTip: A codicil CANNOT republish an invalid will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Holographic Wills

A

A holographic will is a handwritten will that is NOT witnessed. In states that recognize holographic wills, some require that the will be “subscribed to by the testator”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Incorporation by Reference

A

A document or writing may be incorporated into a will by reference if (1) it was in existence at the time of execution of the will;
(2) it is sufficiently described in the will; AND
(3) the testator intended to incorporate it into the will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Acts of Independent Significance

A

A court may use an act of independent significance to fill in any gaps of a will. Acts of independent significance are those with significance outside of the will-making process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Revocation by Physical Act

A

A will is revoked by physical act if: (1) the testator intended to revoke the will; AND (2) the will is burned, torn, destroyed, or cancelled by the testator (or someone at his direction and in his presence).

ExamTip: Cancellation by crossing out is OK, but Testator CANNOT pencil in substitutes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Revocation by Subsequent Will or Codicil

A

A testator may revoke a will by executing a subsequent valid will or codicil. Execution of a new will revokes a previous will only to the extent that the previous will conflicts with the new will UNLESS the new will expressly revokes the previous will in its entirety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dependent Relative Revocation

A

The Dependent Relevant Revocation Doctrine (DRR) cancels a previous revocation that was made under a mistaken belief of law or fact by the testator. The doctrine applies when the testator would not have revoked his original will or bequest but for the mistaken belief that another will he prepared would be valid.

ExamTip: DRR ONLY applies when the court can determine that the testator would have preferred the disposition in the revoked will over the disposition resulting from a finding that the testator died intestate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Revival of a Revoked Will

A

Under the UPC and in many states, if a will that wholly revoked a previous will is thereafter revoked, the previous will remains revoked unless it is evident from the circumstances or the testator’s statements that the testator intended to revive the previous will.

ExamTip: A partially revoked will is automatically revived UNLESS it is evident that the testator did not intend to revive it.

17
Q

Meaning of a Will’s Terms

A

Patent and latent ambiguities can be clarified by the introduction of extrinsic evidence.

A will that is clear on its face and does not present an ambiguity cannot be reformed by the court. The Plain meaning of the will’s terms govern its construction.

18
Q

Advancements

A

At common law, gifts to heirs during a testator’s lifetime were considered advancements on the heir’s intestate share of the estate, and were automatically deducted from the heir’s share of the estate.

Under modern law, gifts to heirs during a testator’s lifetime are NOT considered advancements on the heir’s intestate share of the estate UNLESS:

(1) The decedent declared his intent to make the gift an advancement in a contemporaneous writing; OR

(2) The heir acknowledged the gift to be an advancement in writing.

19
Q

Satisfaction

A

A testamentary gift may be satisfied in whole or in part by an inter vivos transfer from the testator to the beneficiary after the execution of the will, if the testator intends the transfer to have that effect.

20
Q

Lapsed Gifts

A

Under the common law rule of lapse, all gifts in a will were HIGH conditioned on the beneficiary surviving the testator. Any gifts to beneficiaries who did not survive the testator failed and passed to the residuary estate or under intestacy.

21
Q

Anti-lapse Statutes

A

A gift will not lapse if an anti-lapse statute applies. The anti-lapse statute provides that, where a beneficiary under a will predeceases the testator, the gift will vest in the issue of that predeceased beneficiary if: (1) the predeceased beneficiary is a specified descendant of the testator (specified by statute); AND (2) the beneficiary leaves issue who survive the testator.

ExamTip: Testator’s express terms will override the default rule above.

22
Q

Abatement

A

Creditors of the estate always have priority to assets of the estate over beneficiaries. If there are more creditor’s claims against an estate than there are assets to cover all of the gifts made under the will, the gifts under the will abate (be reduced).

Order of abatement: 1. Property passing by intestacy; 2. Residuary gifts; 3. General gifts; 4. Specific gifts

23
Q

Slayer Statutes

A

An individual who feloniously and intentionally kills the decedent forfeits all benefits and entitlements to the decedent’s estate. If the decedent dies intestate, the estate passes as if the killer disclaimed her intestate share.

24
Q

Disclaimer

A

A disclaimer is when a person renounces their legal right to inheritance. An effective disclaimer must: (1) be declared in writing; (2) describe the interest or power disclaimed; (3) be signed by the person making the disclaimer; AND (4) be delivered or filed.

A disclaiming person is treated as if they predeceased the testator. The gift will lapse, unless an anti-lapse statute applies.

25
Q

Class Gifts

A

Under the Rule of Convenience, the class of takers closes at the time of grantor’s death.

If a class is specifically named, the gift will lapse unless otherwise provided (or an anti-lapse statute applies).

E.g., My children A, B, and C. B is dead and his share lapses.

If a class is generally named, the gift will be apportioned between living class members.

E.g., My children. B is dead. A and C split B’s share.

26
Q

Elective Share

A

The elective share is calculated by first reducing the gross estate by the exempt personal property set-asides. Next, expenses (but not taxes) are paid to arrive at the net probate estate. In some states, testamentary substitutes (i.e. lifetime transfers or certain non-probate assets) are brought back into the estate to calculate the net estate. Once the net estate is calculated, the surviving spouse is entitled to the statutory percentage (usually one-third), reduced by the value of the assets that would pass absolutely to the spouse under the decedent’s will. The surviving spouse is NOT entitled to the elective share if that amount is less than the amount the spouse would take under the will.

27
Q

Pretermitted Children

A

A pretermitted child is one who was unintentionally left out of a will. If the child was born or adopted after the execution of a will, the child is entitled to an intestate share of the decedent’s estate UNLESS the child was intentionally omitted from the will.

28
Q

Insane Delusion Rule

A

An insane delusion is a belief of supposed facts that do not exist AND that which no rational person would believe.

The delusion must affect testamentary capacity and materially affect a disposition of property by will.

29
Q

Undue Influence

A

A prima facie case of undue influence is established if: (1) the testator had a weakness (physical, mental, or financial) that made him susceptible to influence; (2) the wrongdoer had access to the testator and an opportunity to exert influence; (3) the wrongdoer actively participated in drafting the will; AND (4) there is an unnatural (unexpected) result.

ExamTip: Undue influence is presumed if confidential relationship existed between the testator and the wrongdoer.

30
Q

Fraud

A

A will may be contested on the grounds of fraud when: (1) an individual knowingly makes a material misrepresentation of fact; (2) with the intent to induce reliance by the testator; AND (3) the misrepresentation actually induces reliance to the testator’s detriment.

31
Q

No-Contest Clausese

A

In most states, a provision (known as a no-contest clause) in a will purporting to penalize an interested person for contesting the will or instituting other proceedings relating to the estate is valid.

32
Q

Modification of a Will Due to Mistake

A

Most courts will permit modification of a will to conform to the testator’s intent if there is clear and convincing evidence of a mistake.

33
Q

Durable Healthcare Power of Attorney

A

A durable health-care power of attorney gives a designated agent the power to make healthcare decisions for the principal in the event of the principal’s incapacity. Unless otherwise provided, an agent’s power is NOT limited to a particular event, illness, or time-period.

ExamTip: A living will specifies a patient’s preferences for healthcare treatment.