Wills Flashcards
Valid will
Testator’s intent
For a will to be valid, the testator must intend that the instrument operate as his will. The testator must be of sound mind and reach the age of 18 years of age.
Sound mind factors: testator knows the nature and extent of his property, and understands natural objects of his bounty, i.e., T understands who will get the property, and understands the disposition he is making.
NOTE: Codicils must be executed with the same formalities.
Validi will
writing/witness requirements
- will must be in writing
- signed by the testator and signed by two disinterested attesting witnesses.
- The testator must sign or acknowledge the will in the presence of each witness.
- The attesting witnesses must sign in the testator’s presence.
- Some states - witnesses must sign in each other’s presence.
- (Majority rule→ conscious presence Minority Rule →line of sight).
Attestation Clause
Most wills contain an attestation clause and is prima facie evidence of what was recited in the will. But it is not a substitute for the testimony of the witnesses as to the facts (helps w/faulty or no memory).
Compare Self-proving affidavit - allowed in many states → proves the validity of will and it can be admitted to probate.
Interested Witness Rule
Majority rule → gifts are voided and treated as though the interested witness predeceased the testator (purging statues). UPC abolished this rule.
Exceptions (1) This rule does not apply if there are at least 2 other disinterested Ws or→ the interested W establishes that the bequest was not inserted and that the will was not signed as result of fraud or undue influence. (2) if W-Beneficiary would have taken had the will not been admitted to probate.
Harmless Error Rule
Minority Rule - Ignore harmless errors if there is clear and convincing evidence that the testator intended the document to be their will. This rule only applies if the jurisdiction has a statute that permits it. Example: if a will only has one witness instead of two
Lack of Capacity
Testator must know the nature of his act, the objects of his bounty (children, spouse), the nature and extent of his property, and the scope and meaning of his disposition/will.
Insane Delusion
A false conception about reality that produced a particular
testamentary disposition. Look for a causal connection between the insane
delusion and the result in the wil
Undeue Influence
The following elements must be present: (1) existence and exercise of influence over testator; (2) the effect was to overpower will and mind of testator; and (3) the will is a product of the influence (will/gift would not have been made but for the influence).
Undue Influence is likely easier to prove when you have a confidential relationship (i.e., family relationship). Also, look to see if there is a fiduciary relationship between the T and the influencer!
Mistake
A will cannot be modified or reformed because of a mistake. Under the UPC the will can be reformed if the testator’s intent is proven by clear and convincing evidence.
Mistake in Execution: Where the testator does not know they are a signing a will and thus a lacks testamentary intent. Extrinsic evidence is allowed to show that the testator did not know they were signing a will.
Mistake in Inducement: Where the testator writes a will based on inaccurate or a misunderstanding of fact or law, leading them to make a bequest they would not have made if they knew the truth (usually not grounds for modification, but some jurisdictions allow it).
Holographic Wills
valid in a majority of states (soldier/sailor act also apply).
Mostly handwritten Signed Will by T.
T can handwrite a will and then later have it signed and witnessed → this is not a holographic will at all.
Incorporation by reference
if the will refers to a separate document → the document must be in existence at the time of execution of will and be sufficiently described so that it can be identified in the will, and the will manifests and intent to incorporate the document into the will. → It cannot be subsequently revised unless the will formalities are followed.
Two exceptions where document does not have to be in existence at time will is created
* if a pour over trust is amended after the will
* Tangible Personal Property Memorandum (must be signed, describe with certainty)
Abatement
A gift abates where the estate has insufficient. assets to satisfy all the gifts, debts, and expenses of the estate.
order of abatement:
1. property passing by intestacy
2. residuary estate
3. General legacies
4. demonstrative legacies
5. specific bequests and devises
Within a class gifts will abate pro rata according to will terms
Types of Gifts
Specific - particular item
General - amount of money (unless specified source)
Demonstrative - amount of money from specified source (bank account)
Residuary - the rest of the estate after distributing the above.
Ademption
If specific devise is gone it is adeemed by extinction. Most states follow “identity” approach whcih does not provide a substitute gift for the beneficiary. Other states they can prove the testators intent.
General or demonstrative devises are no adeemed by lack of cash or asset. They will be satisfied by selling other assets.
Property can be adeemed by satisfaction which happens via inter vivos transfer if testator intends it.
Omitted Child Statute
“pretermintted child”
the omitted child must have been born or adopted after the execution of the will
the omttied child will take intestate share “forced share” or same share as other children
Omitted Spouse
majority: If T marries after executing a will, the marriage has no effecct on the prior will and new spouse can take under elective share statute.
UPC or minority: If a person marries after will, and the spouse survives, the new spouse takes an intestate share.
The Statute does not apply if the:
1. Will was made in contemplation of marriage; or 2. Will states that it should survive subsequent marriage; or 3. T provided for new spouse by transfer outside of the will (e.g. revocable trust)
Anti-Lapse
When bene dies before T a lapsed gift is saved by statute if predeceasing bene is within specified degree of relationship to the T and left surviving descendants
UPC: saves gift if bene is stepchild, grandparent, or a descendant of grandparent
UPC: applies statute to trusts too
UPC: words of survivorship are not enought to negate the application of anti-lapse statute
Most states: words of survivorship constitute contrary provision