will contsruction -- class gifts and ademption Flashcards

1
Q

what is a class gift

A

A class gift arises if the testator was GROUP MINDED
Ie rather than naming the beneficiaries individually, he uses a common label to describe the beneficiaries as a class

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how are class gifts treated differently under lapse

A

If a class member predeceases the testator, the surviving members of the class divide the total gift, including the deceased member’s share, unless an Antilapse statue applies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

dawson v yucus

The testator wrote a will, the second clause of her will providing the following (see full lang on page 378)

One half of my interest therein to Setwart Wilson, a nephew, now living in Birmingham, Michigan and one half of my interest to Gene Burtle, a nephew, now living in Mission, Kansas

The testator devised the residue of her estate to Ina Mae Yucus and Hazel Degelow

Gene, one of the nephews to whom the testator devised her interest to the farm, died before her

Whether the gift to the nephews was a class gift so that the surviving nephews would take Gene’s share, or if Gene’s share would lapse and pass to Yucus and Degelow as part of the residue

There is a class label (nephew) BUT is it describing a class or just describing who the beneficiaries are?

A

The court below correctly held that upon the death of gene the devise to him lapsed and passed under the residuary clause of the will

There is nothing in in the lang of the will that indicates the testator intended to create a class or survivorship gift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

in dawson, what are arguments against a class gift

A

Not as a description of the class but the individual named
Maybe using it to clear up any potential latent ambiguities
She also specifies how much they are to get WHICH IS NOT HOW CLASS GIFTS WORK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

why would it be an argument that a class gift was not made if the testator specifes how much a person is going to get

A

Class gifts specifically are flexible in how much a class member may receive; how much you get depends on if people join via birth or leave via death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the best way to create a class gift

A

No magic words but you must make it a general term/label that we can figure out

Shares fluctuate as time goes on so any indication of specificity of how much they will get may point away from class gift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Can extrinsic evidence come in to help define classes?

A

Yes if its a latent ambiguity as long as you can figure it out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

do lapse flow chart – check slide 9 of class 18

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the presumption behind anti lapse applying to class gifts

A

courts reason that the Anti lapse statues are designed to carry out the typical testator’s intent, and that the typical testator would prefer for a dead class member’s share to go to that member’s descendants rather than to the surviving member of the class

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is scenario does ademption come up in?

A

t’s will gives away a specfic gift, and by the time t dies the gift is no longer in the estate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what kind of devise does ademption apply to?

A

Ademption only applies to specific devises
Does not apply to general, demonstrative, or residuary devises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does the traditional identity theory of ademption say

A

if a specifically devised item is not in the testator’s estate, the gift is EXTINGUISHED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what does the new intent theory of ademption say aka the upc version

A

if the specifically devised item is not in the testator’s estate, the beneficiary may nonetheless be entitled to the replacement or cash value of the original item, if the beneficiary can show that this is what the testator would have wanted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

anton

Hestor Mary Lewis Anton (Mary) left a half interest in her duplex to her stepdaughter, Gretchen Coy, and the other half to her son, Robert Lewis.

After a car accident, Mary moved to a nursing home, and her daughter Nancy, acting under a power of attorney, sold the duplex without Mary’s knowledge to pay for her care.

Gretchen sought to recover the sale proceeds, and the case was appealed to the Iowa Supreme Court.

Whether the sale of certain property by an attorney in fact prior to the death of the testator resulted in the ademption of a specific property bequest

A

The court adopts alternative intent theory of ademption
They allow gretchen to claim a portion of the sales proceeds

Where a specific devise is removed from an estate by the act of an attorney-in-fact that was not known or assented to by the testator, the devise is not adeemed, i.e., canceled, to the extent that identifiable proceeds remain in the possession of the estate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

under the intent theory of ademption aka the upc’s version, what does the specific devisee have a right to in the event the gift does not exist at the time of the testator’s death

A

1.any balance of the purchase price
3.any proceeds unpaid at death on fire or casualty insurance . . . to the property;
5.any . . . property owned by the testator at death which the testator acquired as a replacement for specifically devised . . . property

if not covered by paragraphs (1) through (5), a pecuniary devise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

the upc intnet theory of ademption says that an option for a devisee to get is a replacement – what does that mean?

A

gives you room to argue as UPC does not define what replacement property is

Really depends on if you can connect the use of the OG and replacement

What you need for proper replacement
Use
Tracing proceeds from sale
Time

17
Q

bequest of stocks - look up in e and e

A

acquiring stocks passively - specific = beneficiary gets the OG amount and the ones acquired passively

if general - only get the OG amount in will

18
Q

satisfaction upc 2-609 look up in e and e

A

If a person (the decedent) makes a gift to a beneficiary during their lifetime, that gift may count toward the beneficiary’s share of the decedent’s estate (i.e., it may “satisfy” a bequest in the will)

19
Q

exoneration of leins look up

A

Common law
an heir or devisee is generally entitled to have encumbrances upon real estate paid by the estate’s personalty unless, in the devisee’s case, the will directs otherwise

UPC
A specific devise passes subject to any mortgage interest existing at the date of death, without right of exoneration, regardless of a general directive in the will to pay debts

20
Q

what is the issue of abatment

A

if an estate lacks enough assests to pay the decdent’s debts as wll as all devises

if this happens, some devises must be abated or reduced

21
Q

in the absece of an indication of how the devises should be abated in the scenario of insuffenct funds to pay the debt, what is the order in which they payment should come out of?

A
  1. residuary devises are reduced first
  2. general devises are reduced second
  3. specific and demonstrative devises are the last to abate and are reduced pro rata (ie proportionally)