trusts: revocable trusts as will substitute Flashcards
if the trust is serving as the substitute for the will, is it revocable or irrevocable
revocable
are non probate will substitutes testamentary in nature?
no
fulp v gilliard
We have a trust that’s revocable
The property is the farm
Ruth is primary beneficiary of trust and the trustee
She has all the control
Kids are beneficiaries when she dies
But she decides to sell the property
When ruth sells the property the kids complain – harold as the beneficiary in particular
Argue that she made a below market sale
Trustees can sell trust property, the proceeds would just become the new trust property
But kids argue it wasn’t a fair market sale and that as trustee she breached a fiduciary duty to the remainder beneficiaries by selling the farm that low
Does the trustee of a revocable trust owe a duty to remainder beneficiaries?
While the trust is revocable, the settlor has all the control, and where the trust serves as a will sub, the settlor and trustee are usually the same person
how would the outcome be diffrent in the fulp case if it were a will (ie the one where she sold the farm at below market value and the kids argued she breached a fiduciary duty to them as beneficiaries)
If this were a will this wouldn’t really be an issue
Kids might argue its their inheritance and it would be an issue of ademption if this were a will
what does the upc say about duties owed to the settlor in revocable trust
To the extent a trust is revocable [and the settlor has capacity to revoke the trust], the rights of the beneficiaries are subject to the control of, and the duties of the trustee are owed exclusively to, the settlor
how do we know that a trust is revokable
UTC – the code PRESUMES REVOCABILTY unless otherwise stated – the lang must expressly relinquish the ablity to revoke
Based on presumption that most people want to retain the right to revoke
how can a revokable trust be created via a deed of trust
by a deed of trust where the settlor transfers to the trustee the property to be held in trust
at the settlor’s death the trust property is distributed or held in further trust in accordance with the terms of the trust
the settlor is free to revoke the trust and take back the trust property
how is a revokable trust created by a declration of trust
where the settlor declares himself to be trustee of certian propety for his own benefit during his life, with the remainder to pass at his death in accordance with the terms of his declaration
why would anyone want an irrevocable trust
Tax reasons, creditor protection reasons
what does a settlor have to do to exercise the right to revoke/amended
a revocable trust can be amended or revoked in any manner that clearly manifests the settlor’s intent to do so, unless the trust instrument specifies a particular method of amended or revocation and makes that method EXCLUSIVE
patterson
In 1999, Darlene Patterson created the Darlene Patterson Family Protection Trust, reserving the right to amend or revoke it by written instrument delivered to the trustee. In 2006, she amended the trust to remove her son, Ron Patterson, as a beneficiary. Ron sued to invalidate the amendment, and the district court granted him partial summary judgment
Argues that she did not do what she needed to do to effectuate her intent to revoke his interest in the trust and wants to apply banks
Banks Held that strict compliance to process settlor disturbed in trust document
Under the Utah Uniform Trust Code, a settlor need not comply with the amendment requirements of a trust unless such terms are deemed the exclusive means for amendment.
Is what her trust doc says an exclusive method or permissible?
Not exclusive but that’s ok, we have two other ways – will/codicil or clear and convincing evidence
In the absence of a method of revocation in the trust document, most jurisdictions just look for clear and convincing evince
draw out the utc method of revocation of trusts
check
pena
the settlor of a revokable trust that requires amendments to be made by written instrument signed by the settlor makes handwritten changes to the trust instrument, affixes an explanatory stick note with a signature
are the handwritten changes plus the signed sticky notes enough to have amended the trust?
Sticky note not enough given that what trust document said about method of revocation
Example of a stricter court