Why was the NEP controversial Flashcards
1
Q
What was the NEP
A
- Was intended by Lenin primarily to meet Russia's urgent need for food - War communism had clearly failed to provide its intention - If the peasants could not be forced then they must be persuaded - Spring 1921 - Peasants allowed to keep their food surpluses and sell them for a profit - Money to be re-introduced as a means of trading - Public markets to be restored
2
Q
Why was the NEP controversial to many Bolsheviks
A
- Lenin demanded that
political theory take second
place to economic necessity - This troubled many members such as
Trotsky who argued that war communism
was a proper revolutionary strategy - To many Bolsheviks, treating the peasants
harshly was exactly what they had done for
years and there was little reason not to
continue - It disturbed them that the peasants were
being given into and capitalist ways were
being tolerated
3
Q
Was the NEP a success
A
- One of the main controversies came from the
fact that the NEP turned out a success - By 1924, the Soviet economy had begun to make
a marked recovery - This created huge controversy, especially after
Lenins death, the capitalist policy that
supposedly represented everything the
Bolsheviks despised had been a greater
success than Communist ideologically driven
policies
4
Q
What was War Communism
A
- Aeries of harshly restrictive economic measures
which were introduced in June 1918 and collectively
known as war communism - In three parts
- Centralising of the industry
- ending of private ownership
- The squeezing of the peasants
- For Lenin, the major purpose of War Communism was to
tighten government control over agriculture and force
the peasants to provide more food - Heavily under the control of the Cheka, whom ensured
quotas were met for the soldiers fighting in the civil
war despite the dire food shortages it created for
ordinary people
5
Q
How did the Kronstadt Rising 1921 contribute to the formation of the NEP
A
- There was growing opposition to war communism within
the Bolshevik political sphere - In 1921, two prominent Bolsheviks, the labour commissar
and the outstanding women in the party
led an opposition movement with thousands of
Petrograd workers - They linked up with sailors and
dockyard workers - A manifesto was produced which included New
elections to the Soviets, freedom of speech and of the
press and freedom of assembly - this was significant -
the fact that the workers and sailors of Kronstadt had
written this manifesto - they had been the great
supporters and inspirers of the Bolsheviks in 1917 - 60,000 Red troops stormed the Kronstadt base
- Thousands of workers and Red army troops killed
- Despite its crushing Lenin realised that War
Communism was slowly tearing the country apart:
quoted ‘lit up reality like a lightening flash’
6
Q
Why did War Communism fail
A
- Did nothing to increase industrial or agricultural
production - it was imposed at a time of severe
industrial disruption. - Military needs were given priority, thus denying
recourses to those industries not considered essential - Farmers and the Government could not agree on a fair
price for their produce - led to a breakdown in relations, the government
condemned them as anti-revolutionaries and sent
Cheka requisitioning units to the countryside - They systematically terrorised the peasants and forced
them to give up their food - However all it did was lead to a decrease in production
and less food available - Resulted in mass famine in the countryside
- influenced the formation of the NEP
- 5 million starved to death of the 10 million casualties in
the civil war
7
Q
What were the main reasons for the formation of the NEP
A
- Failure of the policy of War Communism
- Russia’s dire need for food
- Kronstadt Rising 1921
8
Q
When was the NEP installed as a policy
A
Spring 1921
9
Q
Evaluate Lenin’s strengths and weaknesses as the Bolshevik leader between 1917 - 1924
A
Strengths
In general, Lenin’s strengths far outweighed his weaknesses.
- Total ruthlessness in his pursuit of his revolutionary
objectives - A remarkable sense of political opportunism, which
enabled him to lead his minority party into power in 1917
and then establish a Communist state - A driving sense of self-belief that allowed him to
overcome opposition within to overcome - A refusal to be deterred by reversal and failure which
saw him survive in exile, civil war, economic collapse,
famine and foreign invasion
However, one cannot be sympathetic to the methods of Lenin
- Conviction and commitment led him to disregard the
human the human cost of his methods - His ruthless approach led to unnecessary suffering and
created a set of grim precedents - While he was occasionally willing to adjust economic
policy for expediency’s sake, Lenin’s basic hostility to
capitalism denied Soviet Russia the opportunity to
achieve sustained growth.