What caused the 1905 revolution? Flashcards
What were the 4 fundamental causes of the 1905 revolution
- Russo Japanese war 1904-05
- Bloody Sunday (January 1905)
- Economic hardship
- Political oppression
Why did the Russo Japanese war occur
- The Russian government prior to 1904 had led an
expansionist policy into the Far East, to make up for
what it saw as its relative decline in Europe - in 1904 when talks broke down between Russia and
Japan, war appeared imminent - However it could have been avoided and it was largely
of Russia’s own making
What was the Russian governments three reasons for wanting war with Japan
- Divert attention away from the troubles at home by rallying the nation into a patriotic struggle
- To obtain ice free ports
- To continue expansionist policy into the far East
Why did Russia lose the Russo-Japanese war
- Russia greatly underestimated the strength of Japans
forces - It was not the backward state Russia had imagined and
had modernised greatly - The Japanese army were far better prepared and
equipped for the Russian forces and won a series of
major battles - Port Arthur fell in January 1905 and the following month
the Japanese seized Mukden - The final humiliation came at sea, the entire Russian
Baltic fleet that took 8 months to reach Japan was
entirely destroyed by the Japanese fleet - Russia was forced into withdrawing forces and making
peace - The war was not lost because Russian troops fought
badly, but because their military commanders had not
prepared effectively - They understood neither the enemy they were fighting
nor the territory in which the struggle took place
How did the defeat from the Russo-Japanese war contribute to the 1905 revolution
- The loss from a smaller, inferior nation was a
humiliation for Russia - Within Russia, the incompetence of the government
which the war glaringly revealed, exited the social
unrest which it had been specifically designed to
dampen - Soldiers came home in anger and frustration at the
incompetence at the government and military generals - Many began to feel like the government was working
directly against them
Economic hardship
- Over three-quarters of the Russian population were
unhappy with their position in the Empire. - Peasants and workers alike suffered horrendous
living and working conditions - Famine was a common occurrence at the turn of
the century. There was widespread famine in 1901.
Even though they did not have enough to feed
themselves, peasants were expected to produce
surplus grain for export. - Protests and strikes were on the increase in the
early 1900s. By 1905 they were severe and
widespread. - With industrialisation, under the guidance of Tsarist
advisers Vyshnegradsky and Witte, came increased
urbanisation. The population of Russia’s towns and
cities multiplied by four. - Working conditions were terrible and trade
unionism was banned. There was little to protect
the pay or safety of workers
Bloody Sunday
- 22nd January 1905, Father Gapon, an orthodox priest
attempted to lead a peaceful march in St Petersburg of
workers and their families to present a petition to the
tsar, begging him to use his loyal authority to relieve the
desperate working conditions - The marchers were then fired on and charged by
cavalry - 200 killed
- Fundamental as it gravely damaged the tsars traditional
image as the ‘Little Father’, the guardian of the Russian
people - Immediate reaction was widespread panic and disorder
in the aftermath - Strikes occurred in all the major cities and towns.
- Terrorism against government officials and landlords,
much of it organised by Social Revolutionaries,
spread into the countryside - public buildings and private estates attacked and
burned - you could argue that this was the last chance for the tsar
to get back on the peoples side and his refusal to co-
operate was what resulted in the 1905 revolution
Political oppression
- Many were unhappy with the political conditions of
Russia in 1905 - Prisons were overflowing with convicts of any real
crime, the city streets were full of soldiers ready to
shoot people on the spot - Power stretched everywhere, denying freedom of
religious and political expression - Ethnic minorities were greatly oppressed by the policies
of Russification - Jewish people were persecuted by
state-sanctioned programmes - There was no such thing as political freedom, any
political groups were struck down by the Ohkrana
What were the Reformers made up of
Made up of the Octobrists and the Kadets
Octobrists
- Dated from the issuing of the tsar’s manifesto of October
1905, which created the duma. - The Octobrists were moderates who were loyal to the
tsar and his government - They believed in the maintenance of the Russian Empire
the regarded the manifesto and the establishment of the
duma as major constitutional advances - In the dumas, the Octobrists frequently voiced serious
criticisms of the short-sightedness or incompetence of
the tsarist governmentKadets
- The Kadets, the largest of the liberal parties, wanted
Russia to develop as a constitutional monarchy in which
the powers of the tsar would be restricted by a
democratically elected constituent - They believed that such a body, representative of the
whole of Russia, would be able to settle the nation’s
outstanding social, political and economic problems/
What were the revolutionaries made up of
Made up of the Social Revolutionaries and the Social Democrats
Social Revolutionaries (SRs)
- The Socialist Revolutionaries adopted a combination of
Marxist and Populist beliefs. - They wanted to overthrow the government in favour of
giving power to the peasants. - Although they were greatly uncoordinated in their
efforts, they carried out approximately 2,000 political
assassinations in the years leading up to the 1905
Revolution. - This included Vyacheslav Plehve, the interior minister
Social Democrats (SDs)
- Social Democrat beliefs were based on Marxism.
- They believed that critical determinant of human
behaviour was class struggle, a process that operated
throughout history - The group split in 1903 after an ideological
disagreement. The Mensheviks, led by Martov, wanted
revolution by the workers to occur naturally. The
Bolsheviks led by Lenin, believed the revolution should
be driven by human influence - Lacked significance in the 1905 revolution compared to
the SRs
What were the two main groups opposed to tsardom in Nicholas II reign
- revolutionaries
- reformers
How did the Government respond to the 1905 incident
- Tsar was unable to make decisive decision and turned to
Witte in June 1905 - who promoted his to chairman of the
Council of Ministers - Witte was frustrated by the inability of the tsar and his
ministers to understand the crisis that Russia was in - He negotiated peace terms with the Japanese
- By October, the tsar was faced by the most united
opposition in Romanov history and concessions were
unavoidable - On Wittes advice, the tsar issued the October Manifesto which led to the created of
1. A legislative duma 2. freedom of speech, assembly and worship 3. the right for political parties to exist 4. the legalising of trade unions
- This satisfied the liberals who saw these concessions as
a remarkable success - Witte then appeased the peasants by an announcement
in November that the mortgage repayment scheme be
reduced and eventually abolished - this reduced land
seizures and general lawlessness in the countryside - The industrial workers were less appeased - here the
policy was one not of concessions but of suppression.
The government felt strong enough to crush the soviets.
The returning soldiers, proved useful at quell the
rebellious strikers
What was the significance of the 1905 revolution
- The 1905 revolution showed that as long as the tsarist
government kept its nerve and the army remained loyal, the
forces of protest would find it very difficult to mount a genuine
or serious challenge - Although the tsar appeared to grant significant concessions
in the October Manifesto, these were expedients rather than
real reforms - The duma was not intended to be, nor did it become, a
limitation of the tsars autocratic powers - The 1905 revolution had failed because of the disunity and
inexperienced protestors and the loyalty of the army
What was the Potemkin mutiny
- summer of 1905 saw multiple mutinies in the army and navy -
many of whom were furious at the outcome of the Russo-
Japanese war - The serving soldiers and sailors who were conscripted
peasants were naturally reluctant to attack their own kind,
workers or peasants: There were several instances of troops
disobeying orders to shoot unarmed strikers - In June, the crew of the Potemkin black sea naval squadron
mutinied while at sea - the crew attacked the officers, killed
several men, and then took over the ship - signified the lack of control in government that their own
battleships were being taken over and used against them