Whig Political Theory (2) Flashcards
Locke - Biography
- Locke, John (1632–1704)
- Born to family of marginal gentry who sided with Parliament in the Civil War
- 14th November, 1675, anonymous pamphlet attacking Earl of Danby (King’s chief policy maker) is published. Has been attributed to Locke, and definitely came from within Shaftesbury’s circle –> Locke in France 1675-79
- Wrote the Treatises in 1680
- 7th September 1683, Locke is in Rotterdam following the discovery of the Rye House Plot
Locke - the key texts
- Two treatise on government
First Treatise:
- Belonged to the debate of 1680-81, concerned with the succession (and exclusion crisis)
- Part of Shaftesbury’s political campaign to get the exclusion bill passed in the parliamentary sessions of 1680-81
Second Treatise:
- An attack on Robert Filmers Patriarcha
- A justification for resistance to tyranny under Charles the II, and James II.
- Letter concerning Toleration?
Locke - why is absolute monarchy not a form of civil gvt?
- Absolute monarchy is not a form of civil government, because there is no neutral authority to decide disputes between the monarch and a subject; in fact the monarch, in relation to his subjects, is still in a state of nature.
- Absolute monarchy is as if men protected themselves against polecats and foxes, “but are content,
nay think it safety, to be devoured by lions.” - Locke defines tyranny as “the exercise of power beyond right.” A just leader is bound by the laws of the legislative and works for the people, whereas a tyrant breaks the laws and acts on his own behalf - any executive body that ceases to function for the people is tyranny
Locke’s system of government?
The State of Nature and the Social Contract
Advocate of Civil Government under a commonwealth
- The State of Nature: Men obey reason, and have ‘no superior, on earth. Men can punish attacks on themselves or property in the state of nature. Men surrender the right to do this when they enter into the Social Contract.
- The Social Contract: The people and the government are parties in a contract. Government must defend the rights of the people, as the people have surrendered the right to defend them themselves.
- Legislative was a single, hereditary figure. Locke did not advocate a new kind of constitution
Locke - the importance of property
- Property is extremely important to Locke: ‘The great and chief end of men uniting into commonwealths, and putting themselves under government, is the preservation of their property’
- ‘nobody has an absolute arbitrary power over himself, or over any other, to destroy his own life, or take away the life or property of another’
- If property is not protected, it may warrant resistance.
- FJ: property to Locke = life, liberty and estate (from Latin etymology)
FJ: For Locke, commerce (and accumulation of property) is a principal means by which man escapes the privation that unimproved state of nature condemns him to.
Locke - the relationship between property and government
- Locke presumes people will understand that, in order to best protect themselves and their property, they must come together into some sort of body politic and agree to adhere to certain standards of behavior. Thus, they relinquish some of their natural rights to enter into a social compact.
Locke - the right to resistance
- Locke advocated Social Contract Theory. If either party, Government or People, violated the contact, resistance was justified.
–> - If a monarch prevents the Legislative power from operating, they are ‘exercising force without authority’
—–> ‘when [the legislative power] are hindered by any force from what is so necessary to the society…the people have a right to remove it by force.’
———–> The use of force without authority, always puts him that uses it into a state of war, as the aggressor, and renders him liable to be treated accordingly. i.e. tyrants = beheaded
FJ: The people could instigate a revolution against the government when it acted against the interests of citizens, to replace the government with one that served the interests of citizens.
Locke - the rights of the citizen
- Citizenry had surrendered certain rights to the government, but that does not mean that the government is a supreme or absolute power because the citizenry are sovereign, and the government’s power is predicated on them.
- ‘nobody can transfer to another more power than he has in himself; and nobody has an absolute arbitrary power over himself, or over any other, to destroy his own life, or take away the life or property of another’
Locke - which citizens should participate in government?
- believed that reasonable beings (though born free and equal) would allow the most intelligent and competent to direct affairs. Women, children, and inferior males would all willingly accept the guidance of the strong, able, intelligent property owners who sat in Parliament; or, if they would not in fact accept it, they ought rationally to do so - and that was what counted.
‘some one good and excellent man having got a pre-eminency amongst the rest…’
Locke on Liberty
- Attacked Filmer’s Patriarcha and the idea that people are not at liberty to choose their government as government is divinely ordained
- ‘lives, liberty, property and religion’ are rights afforded to all citizens
- these rights are protected when people enter into civil society
Locke’s immediate significance
Locke’s Long-term significance
SHORT TERM
- Not published until 1690, so no immediate impact
- We can assume it was very significance in Shaftesbury’s inner circle and reflects their ideology. The ideas were significant, rather than the publication of those ideas.
- Toleration: A Letter Concerning Toleration (1689), in favour of toleration because sees government and religion as separate, therefore should be treated separately. The government was for external interests (life, liberty, welfare) whereas religion was for internal interests (e.g. salvation). He argued that civil unrest is caused by religious groups reaction to being told by magistrates what they can practice, so should practice toleration.
- Didn’t include atheists because they could not perform public oaths or uphold other bonds of human society
- Didn’t include Catholics because they swear their allegiance to another Prince, the Pope and one cannot have protection under two princes.
LONG TERM
- Important long-term impact. Important statement on liberty and freedom from tyranny.
- Formative ideas for the American Revolution
Algernon Sidney - biography
- Sidney, Algernon (1623-1683)
- a younger son of the Earl of Leicester
- Algernon fought for Parliament during the English Civil War
- He refused to take part in the trial and execution of Charles I, but did serve in the Rump Parliament until Cromwell’s seizure of power.
- After the Restoration of Charles II in 1660, Sidney lived on the Continent until 1677, when he returned to England and soon became involved with the Whig opposition.
- Algernon Sidney was executed on the evidence of informers and the manuscript of a a work written against Sir Robert Filmer’s theory of the divine right of kings.
- Sidney’s manuscript was eventually published as Discourses concerning government in 1698.
Algernon Sidney - key texts
- Discourses concerning government written between 1681 and 1683
- a refutation of Sir Robert Filmer’s Patriarcha (1680)
- self-defence of protestants, against persecution and popery, in which his ancestors had long been involved, and which had once again become necessary in England following the loyalist reaction.
- 3 (untitled) chapters responding to Filmer’s 3
- I. Paternal power is entirely different from political power.
- II. The people choose their governors by virtue of their natural right to liberty, and that government with a strong popular element is the best.
- III. Kings are entirely subject to the law, which in England means the Parliament.
- Court Maxims 1665–1666
Why does Blair Worden say Algernon Sidney was influenced by Primogeniture?
- Worden argues that Sidney is influenced by primogeniture because of his older brother receiving the family title and of his economic dependence and duty of obedience to his father who only died when he was 54
Algernon Sidney’s form of government
- Absolute monarchy is a ‘political evil’, advocate of social contract, free choice> birthright of rulers
- broadly the Court Maxims is a systematic assault upon monarchy - ‘as death is the greatest evil that can befall a person, monarchy is the worst evil that can befall a nation’
- As monarchy is private interest government and republicanism government in the public interest each is ‘irreconcileably contrary’ to the other.
- Not birth but free choice determines men’s rightful rulers
- The purpose of government goes beyond the protection of mere liberty; it must reward excellence and punish vice
- Sidney proceeds that partly or wholly democratic governments are his preference - most consistent with the liberty we are born to and provide the greatest opportunity for merit to receive its due reward
- to Sidney a healthy constitution was one that secured the rule of the virtuous
Algernon Sidney - Property
- Praises commerce, wealth, and property in so far that it is an end of statesmanship. However, this is only because it can contribute to a nation’s fighting strength.
- Moneymaking is corrupting.
- Government must protect the people’s rights to their “lands, goods, lives, and liberties”
Algernon Sidney - Right of Resistance
- In Court Maxims and Discourses he argues for rebellion against the restored monarchy
- it anticipates key features of Locke’s aswell as Sidney’s later classic justifications of resistance
- (Discourses) Just government being instituted by the consent of the governed and for ends limited by the natural law and by the original contract, it follows that the people have a right to overthrow their government when it violates these limits.
- Sidney argues that the people have not merely a right but also an obligation to disobey bad laws and to depose or kill a tyrant
Algernon Sidney - Citizenship and participation
- Sidney believes that freedom and manhood are attained only by men who study the constitutions under which they live and who participate fully in politics as citizens.
- Sidney’s citizenry, like Machiavelli’s, is to be “armed and generous,” its hearts “filled with love to their country,” whose interests are identical to its own. Sidney has Machiavelli’s liking for “frugality” and “honest poverty” and a corresponding distaste for “luxury” and “effeminacy.” He agrees with Machiavelli that a healthy commonwealth will be a “commonwealth for expansion,” its citizens trained primarily for war rather than for trade.
- For Sidney, the goal of a true nobility is to lead a community toward moral and political fulfilment.
Algernon Sidney - Liberty
- it appeals to the godly to resist the restoration of religious persecution.
- it defends the principles (liberty, reason, and virtue) informing that classical moral philosophy which established the necessity of republican political architecture.
- “men are naturally free,” equal liberty being “the gift of God and nature.”
- “Liberty without restraint,” however, is undesirable, “being inconsistent with any government, and the good which man naturally desires”
- liberty is acting in accord with reason, not passion.
- Sidney, on toleration, maintained since belief is not the act of the will its not in anyone’s power to believe what they please. Every man has a rational and natural right to dispute what is uncertain until convinced it is true. To mix church and state is to pollute the purity of the spirit with the filth of the world
Sidney’s significance, short term and long term
Short Term
- Sidney’s argument might seem to have been vindicated five years after his death by the Glorious Revolution of 1688. The forced abdication of King James II broke up the last attempt to impose absolute monarchy on England. (although long opponent of the oranges)
- his posthumous admirers have divided between Whig dissenters and Whig deists, both of whom have claimed Algernon for their faiths
- Whig leadership were embarrassed by him. He was very much rooted in the ‘country’ and championed by the radicals
- while radicals might hope to make Sidney’s contract theory respectable, his republicanism and his views on resistance were more problematical. The radicals played them down and concentrated in- stead on Sidney’s antipathy to courtly corruption.
Long Term
- Among those who cited Sidney prominently in their writings, besides Jefferson and Adams, were Jonathan Mayhew, the spirited patriot preacher of Massachusetts, and Arthur Lee, a leading revolutionary politician of Virginia.
- Many prisoners in France during the Revolution likewise found that the image of Algernon Sidney came into their minds. French revolutionaries carried busts of Sidney on demonstrations.
- declaration of independence
- Celebrated and respected by Romantics e.g. Byron, Shelley and Southey
BUT
- Declining influence down the centuries
- Reputation shattered in 1773 when Dalrymple published documents from the French archives that showed that Sidney, whom the eighteenth century had come to know as a patriot inflexibly opposed to bribery and corruption, had taken money from the French ambassador Barillon
- The intellectual body blow to Sidney’s reputation was dealt by the leading Whig historians of the earlier nineteenth century, who, al- though of course enamoured of 1688, were careful to distance themselves due to his inflexibility on abstract ideas
James Harrington - Biography
- Harrington, James (1611–1677)
- Family of parliamentarians
- Very close with Henry Neville
- Gentleman of the bedchamber to Charles I (1647)
- Wrote ‘Oceana’ in 1856, two years before Cromwell’s death
- Radical works to the end of Cromwell’s reign, and with the restoration of the Rump Parliament
James Harrington - The Text
- Oceana was published in 1656
- First published in September, but censored by Cromwell
- Republished, successfully, in November.
- Dedicated to Oliver Cromwell, yet printed at a time of frustration with the republican regime
- The purpose of Harrington’s book was to demonstrate that England was ripe for republican government and to provide a blueprint for the type of republic that ought to be adopted - Hammersley
The Text
- ‘Model of the Commonwealth of Oceana’, a draft constitution consisting of thirty ‘Orders’.
- This constitution is prefaced by three sections:
- ‘The Introduction or Order of the Work’, in which the scene is set;
- ‘The Preliminaries, showing the Principles of Government’, which sets out the political theory and history behind the model constitution
- ‘The Council of Legislators’, which explores the context in which the ‘Model of the Commonwealth’ was supposedly drawn up.
- The work then closes with ‘The Corollary’ in which the consequences of the introduction of this type of government are set out.
James Harrington’s Theory of Government
- Ancient jurisprudence: ‘preserved upon the foundation of common right or interest’, ‘it is the empire of laws and not of men’
- ‘the commonwealth consisteth of the senate proposing, the people resolving, and the magistracy executing, whereby partaking of the aristocracy as in the senate, of the democracy as in the people, and of monarchy as in the magistracy’
- rotation of office and the adoption of a special ballot to minimise corruption
James Harrington - Property
- for Harrington the relationship between land and political power was crucial.
- Distribution of property changed the form of government that was appropriate: land owned by one man was suited to a monarchy; by many, to a commonwealth
- rule founded on Agrarian Law: maintance of the balance of property
- The Second Part of the Preliminaries’: Argues that Henry VII and VIII dispensed property to the people, so that by the time the Stuarts reigned the power was with the people
James Harrington - Resistance and Revolution
- Revolutionary in the sense of moving away from monarchy and trying to change the course of events after the interregnum
- However, important that Harrington did NOT articulate a position on Resistance