The Bluffer's Guide to: The Media Landscape Flashcards
Annabel Patterson on the relationship between print and government
Annabel Patterson argues that a delicate balance existed
between writers and those who held power; she claims that ‘what we are considering here was essentially a joint project, a cultural bargain between writers and political leaders’
A very brief overview of print censorship across the century
WOODFORD
PRE 1641
- In the sixteenth century, the Stationers’ Company was responsible for monitoring the book trade.
- Also a licensing system established by the Star Chamber and overseen by six individuals
POST 1641
- After the Star Chamber was abolished in 1641, the licensing system ceased to exist, leaving
no effective controls on the press
- the Long Parliament attempted to restrict the expanding print industry by passing its own printing regulations in 1643 and 1647
- In 1649, the Rump Parliament passed its own print act, which empowered the Masters and the Wardens of the Company to ‘make diligent search in all places where they shall think meet, for all unallowed Printing-presses, and all Presses any way imployed in the printing
CROMWELL
- Licencsing act 1655
- Printing the Instrument of Government only permitted by one printer
- Effective control of the press in the Cromwellian Protectorate often relied on soldiers and other state officials spotting hawkers selling pamphlets in the street, and then following up these leads.
- Supression of ‘Killing No Murder’, published in Holland, advocated assassination of Cromwell
Evidence of classism in supression of libeling
FOX
There were, for example, 154 people so charged from the five counties which comprised the Home circuit assizes in the period 1558–1625, and 228 people arraigned in a sample taken from the seventeen counties making up the Home, Northern, Norfolk, and Oxford circuits during the years 1660–85.
——-> In both cases, 86 per cent of the individuals were described as being of‘yeoman’ status or below
Gossiping… who and where?
FOX
It was hardly surprising, therefore, that as political tension began to mount again in 1638, there should be particular concern about beggars and the unemployed who, it was believed, ‘in tymes of suspition or trouble, may by tales and false rumors distracte the peoples mindes’
Around the Royal Exchange, along Cheapside to St Paul’s churchyard and walk, in the taverns and inns which lined Fleet Street and the Strand on the way towards Westminster Hall, the latest news could be found on everyone’s Lips.
The independence of gossipping: Fox
rumours not dependent on the written word
Fox: The Growth of Written News
The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries witnessed a huge growth in the production and accessibility of written news. The progressive increase in literacy levels, the continued expansion of a thriving scribal culture, and the steady growth of printed news in various forms all contributed to this process.
Fox, the changing significance of newsbooks in the English Civil War§
- the role of printed works as vehicles for the dissemination of news was relatively limited pre-civil war
BUT
- With the abolition of the Star Chamber and High Commission at the Civil War, however, the major courts with jurisdiction in such matters were removed and thereafter newsbooks began to flood London.
- In September 1649 the Rump Parliament introduced stringent measures to try to control such publications which Cromwell enforced with particular rigour between August 1655 and his death in 1658.
- After the Restoration, the Licensing Act of 1662 provided an even tighter framework for control of the press until its lapse for the final time in 1695
Fox: The quantity of newsbooks across the period
- Single-sheet corantos, dealing only with foreign affairs, were first published in London in 1621, to be followed by quarto newsbooks which ran from 1632 until their suppression six years later.
- The lapse of control over the press during the Civil War gave rise to an explosion of journalism.
- In all there were no less than 350 separate news tides to appear between 1641 and 1659
AFTER THE WAR
With (p.395) the return of licensing, the government-authorized London Gazette, which began in 1666 and was also confined largely to foreign reports, became the main official source of news.
- In practice, however, the tradition of open and partisan journalism which the mid-century upheavals had spawned could never be suppressed effectively and by the late 1670s factions of all political stripes were again publishing their own weekly and periodical bulletins under the nose of government regulation
Britain’s first newsbooks
RAYMOND
First newsbook appears in November 1641
Weekly
8 pages long
Domestic news
—> ‘There rapidly developed a culture of the pamphlet, of which the newsbook was a central, driving feature.’
Changing style of news
no longer just narrative, but ‘a bitter and aggressive instrument of literary and political faction.
George Thomason begins to collect print in 1640s, which helps
Mercurius Politicus, which would be Britain’s main political publication for next two years, founded in 1650
Key arguments: RAYMOND
‘Newsbooks were, and newspapers continue to be, a central constituent of culture, the network of meanings which operate within a society and regulate communication within it
How were newsbooks disseminated?
Carriers
The Post
Chapmen (travelling seller)
Armies (incidentally)
Distribution of literature, volumes of literature, literacy rates
DISTRIBUTION
- South East better read
High literacy in London
Far reaching: Scotland, ‘the dark corners of Wales’
VOLUMES
- Very hard to say - has been estimated 200 (absolute min), 500 as average minimum
- Methodologies vary: measure length by cost, time taken to print
Literacy rates
- People of all literate classes read newsbooks
- Higher in cities (approx 30%)
Some examples of newsbooks
Aulicus
Mercurius Politicus
How critical were news readers?
RAYMOND
Some readers of newsbooks were far from the gullible, passive victims guided by their appetites described by some of their proud contemporaries and a few later historians. The involvement of persistent readers must change the way we perceive not only these readers but the newsbooks themselves.
Cogswell on the significance of Libels
‘…everything was not tranquil and consensual in early Stuart England. Once we expand our enquiries to include all forms of information, it becomes apparent that the safety of the underground manuscripts allowed contemporaries to conduct a steady, often violent, political debate.’