When cultures meet Flashcards
Modernisation
Economic development/industrialisation Changes in eco-cultural framework -> Expect cultures to adapt to new context -> Prediction: cultural beliefs and values will become more secular and more rational.
Post-modernisation
In context of economic prosperity/security -> Shift from manufacturing to service economy -> Prediction: cultural beliefs and values will become post-materialistic -> Less focus on survival -> Greater focus on self-expression.
Testing cultural change
World values survey -> 7 waves from 1981 to present -> Representative national samples in >75 countries -> Traditional secular-rational values -> God less important, lower respect for authority, lower national pride, abortion more accepted, childrearing more focused on independence and less focused on obedience and religion -> Survival self-expression values -> Self-expression and quality of life more important, economic and physical security less important, people report being happier, more people have signed or would sign a petition, homosexuality more accepted, people are seen as more trustworthy
Intercultural contact
Plural societies -> migrants, sojourners, refugees, tourists, indigenous people. Why there? -> voluntary – forced, sedentary – mobile, permanent – temporary. Global communications.
Acculturation
Classic definition:“Acculturation comprehends those phenomena which result when groups of individuals having different cultures come into continuous first-hand contact with subsequent changes in the original culture patterns of either or both groups” Redfield, Linton, & Herskovits, 1936, cited in Berry, 1997, p. 7) In practice, one group usually changes more. ‘Acculturating group’ vs. ‘receiving society’. Minority vs. majority (numerical or power/influence)
Effects of intercultural contact
Adaptation processes -> Affective -> Behavioural -> Cognitive -> Acculturation strategies -> Changes (or not) in practices, values and identifications. Intergroup relations -> Power differentials -> Peaceful/hostile -> Cultural changes -> Both groups -> Can lead to emergence of new cultures.
Adaption (ABCs)
ABCs of coping with “culture shock” Affective -> (a.k.a. “psychological adaptation”) -> Psychological well-being vs. anxiety, stress, depression). Behavioural (a.k.a. “sociocultural adaptation”) Learning effective social skills for new cultural environment
vs. social difficulties in everyday functioning -> Cognitive, Beliefs, values, and cultural identity.
Outdated view of acculturation
Separation vs assimilation (cultural maintenance vs relationship with dominant group). Key question (for minority members) Is it considered to be of value to maintain cultural identity and characteristics, or to maintain relationships with dominant group?
Acculturation strategies
Berry’s (1990, 1997) theoretical model distinguishes TWO key questions:
1. Is it considered to be of value to maintain cultural identity and characteristics?
2. Is it considered to be of value to maintain relationships with other groups?
Assimilation
relationships with dominant group, cultural maintenance. Integration -> relationships with dominant group. Marginalisation -> relationships with dominant group, cultural maintenance. Separation -> relationships with dominant group, cultural maintenance.
Individual’s strategies measured in terms of:
Preferences for contact, Preferences for cultural maintenance, Cultural identities, Language use and proficiency, Cultural practices (food, clothing, media, etc.) Family and peer relationships, Largest study to date: 4000 young immigrants, 30 ethnic groups, 13 nations, Cluster analysis shows four predicted groupings (Berry, Phinney, Sam & Vedder, 2006).
Findings of individual strategies
In most samples surveyed, Participants tended to prefer integration to the other acculturation strategies, Participants who adopted integration showed the best psychological adaptation / least stress, Marginalisation is least adaptive, Assimilation and separation show intermediate and more variable outcomes, depending on context
What do we mean by integration
Living with multiple cultural identities -> (cf. frame-switching studies) -> Bicultural identity integration -> Perceptions: harmony or conflict? Strategies: blending or compartmentalising? Integration predicts well-being -> Especially harmony.
Settler vs non-settler societies
Berry et al. (2006) distinguished between “settler societies” (e.g. Australia, Canada, USA) “non-settler societies” (e.g., France, Germany, Sweden, UK) Some key results: Integration more common in settler societies. Separation predicts psychological adaptation better in non-settler societies -> Also varies with culture of origin.
Strategies of dominant group
Multiculturalism -> integration, needs policy and values. Melting pot -> assimilation, also pressure cooker, segregation -> separation, also rejection. Exclusion -> marginalisation -> extreme = ethnocide.